Mrko
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20


July 10, 2013, 09:18:51 AM 

Has it been confirmed that these are valid prime chains? If I'm not mistaken (please correct me if I am), primecoin only checks for probable primality.
Indeed. Nevertheless, great results for only 3 days of mining!







Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.

8bitPunk


July 10, 2013, 09:38:58 AM 

Has it been confirmed that these are valid prime chains? If I'm not mistaken (please correct me if I am), primecoin only checks for probable primality.
I used Primeform to test these primes  results below 15746436948707162347681191092622506406480521554672382866529113365451686336191616303820985251295842020684640523576306336183730859560  Evaluator failed 65004063504559525007738276505391185322137155270201199057971076511954045665048965173722209501026611156768988779138868408914387452650147975793533060274322762630 is composite: [27F4F267A7BEF21D] (0.0014s+0.0004s)

BTC 18bPunkuginRBm1Xz9mcgj8mWJnHDAW5Th  Ł LTCgXEdyBdoQ9WdF6JHi7Pa2EWtzbDjG76  Ψ ATEBiTLkLpAYeW5hQknUfSvnb7Abbgegku



rethaw


July 10, 2013, 09:41:00 AM 

Has it been confirmed that these are valid prime chains? If I'm not mistaken (please correct me if I am), primecoin only checks for probable primality.
I used Primeform to test these primes  results below 15746436948707162347681191092622506406480521554672382866529113365451686336191616303820985251295842020684640523576306336183730859560  Evaluator failed 65004063504559525007738276505391185322137155270201199057971076511954045665048965173722209501026611156768988779138868408914387452650147975793533060274322762630 is composite: [27F4F267A7BEF21D] (0.0014s+0.0004s) You tested the centers, you need to test the chain results. In Sunny's paper it describes how to get them, or here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cunningham_chain




8bitPunk


July 10, 2013, 10:09:25 AM 

You are quite right. However, the first probable prime still fails. The positive result is: Primality testing 65004063504559525007738276505391185322137155270201199057971076511954045665048965173722209501026611156768988779138868408914387452650147975793533060274322762631 [N1/N+1, BrillhartLehmerSelfridge] Running N1 test using base 3 Running N1 test using base 7 Running N+1 test using discriminant 19, base 1+sqrt(19) Calling N1 BLS with factored part 49.24% and helper 2.29% (150.19% proof) 65004063504559525007738276505391185322137155270201199057971076511954045665048965173722209501026611156768988779138868408914387452650147975793533060274322762631 is prime! (0.0250s+0.0033s)

BTC 18bPunkuginRBm1Xz9mcgj8mWJnHDAW5Th  Ł LTCgXEdyBdoQ9WdF6JHi7Pa2EWtzbDjG76  Ψ ATEBiTLkLpAYeW5hQknUfSvnb7Abbgegku




ManBearPig


July 10, 2013, 11:55:10 AM 

This is great!




BazkieBumpercar


July 10, 2013, 12:05:17 PM 

Woot! Not sure it's me, I sent some stuff I mined on windows to my linux wallet and then destroyed the windows wallet Anyway, very cool




Tjopper


July 10, 2013, 12:10:15 PM 

Impressive! But not mine :S




Kiaya
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 33


July 10, 2013, 12:21:40 PM 

Amazing result. I was close  but no cigar.




n4ru


July 10, 2013, 01:25:17 PM 

You are quite right. However, the first probable prime still fails. The positive result is: Primality testing 65004063504559525007738276505391185322137155270201199057971076511954045665048965173722209501026611156768988779138868408914387452650147975793533060274322762631 [N1/N+1, BrillhartLehmerSelfridge] Running N1 test using base 3 Running N1 test using base 7 Running N+1 test using discriminant 19, base 1+sqrt(19) Calling N1 BLS with factored part 49.24% and helper 2.29% (150.19% proof) 65004063504559525007738276505391185322137155270201199057971076511954045665048965173722209501026611156768988779138868408914387452650147975793533060274322762631 is prime! (0.0250s+0.0033s)
does this mean it's not actually generating valid primes?




Petr1fied


July 10, 2013, 02:39:41 PM 

Both fail on #9 in my Block Crawler: Block 2044Block 5355Of course that is dependent of my code for generating the chain being correct.




Sunny King


July 10, 2013, 02:47:04 PM 

Both fail on #9 in my Block Crawler: Block 2044Block 5355Of course that is dependent of my code for generating the chain being correct. You miss the first prime. The first prime is origin+1 for 2CC.




Petr1fied


July 10, 2013, 02:57:18 PM 

Both fail on #9 in my Block Crawler: Block 2044Block 5355Of course that is dependent of my code for generating the chain being correct. You miss the first prime. The first prime is origin+1 for 2CC. Fixed.




Vorksholk


July 10, 2013, 03:01:27 PM 

Awesome! Not mine either, unfortunately.




Sunny King


July 10, 2013, 03:01:56 PM 

Good job Petrified! What primality test you are testing on your crawler?




Petr1fied


July 10, 2013, 03:13:35 PM 

It's a php function gmp_prob_prime which is part of the GMP (GNU Multiple Precision) extension. It uses MillerRabin's probabilistic test to check if a number is a prime.




TheSeven


July 10, 2013, 07:54:05 PM 

Hm, none of those are mine so far.

My tip jar: 13kwqR7B4WcSAJCYJH1eXQcxG5vVUwKAqY



8bitPunk


July 11, 2013, 03:51:31 AM 

Is block 2616's TWN8 chain with origin length of 111 digits interesting? edit: Realized that no it wouldn't sit in the top 20 of 'BiTwin Records two links' Bitwin chain records only count even lengths. So we are waiting for the first TWN10 block (which is the bitwin of 4 links)

BTC 18bPunkuginRBm1Xz9mcgj8mWJnHDAW5Th  Ł LTCgXEdyBdoQ9WdF6JHi7Pa2EWtzbDjG76  Ψ ATEBiTLkLpAYeW5hQknUfSvnb7Abbgegku



shakezula


July 11, 2013, 04:08:42 AM 

This is AWESOME! Nice work Sunny, glad to have something new and substantial to mine. I love CPU only and hope it stays that way for awhile.




maco


July 11, 2013, 04:10:35 AM 

Congrats!




