Mrko
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
July 10, 2013, 09:18:51 AM |
|
Has it been confirmed that these are valid prime chains? If I'm not mistaken (please correct me if I am), primecoin only checks for probable primality.
Indeed. Nevertheless, great results for only 3 days of mining!
|
|
|
|
8bitPunk
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
July 10, 2013, 09:38:58 AM |
|
Has it been confirmed that these are valid prime chains? If I'm not mistaken (please correct me if I am), primecoin only checks for probable primality.
I used Primeform to test these primes - results below 15746436948707162347681191092622506406480521554672382866529113365451686336191616303820985251295842020684640523576306336183730859560 - Evaluator failed 65004063504559525007738276505391185322137155270201199057971076511954045665048965173722209501026611156768988779138868408914387452650147975793533060274322762630 is composite: [27F4F267A7BEF21D] (0.0014s+0.0004s)
|
BTC 18bPunkuginRBm1Xz9mcgj8mWJnHDAW5Th | Ł LTCgXEdyBdoQ9WdF6JHi7Pa2EWtzbDjG76 | Ψ ATEBiTLkLpAYeW5hQknUfSvnb7Abbgegku
|
|
|
rethaw
|
|
July 10, 2013, 09:41:00 AM |
|
Has it been confirmed that these are valid prime chains? If I'm not mistaken (please correct me if I am), primecoin only checks for probable primality.
I used Primeform to test these primes - results below 15746436948707162347681191092622506406480521554672382866529113365451686336191616303820985251295842020684640523576306336183730859560 - Evaluator failed 65004063504559525007738276505391185322137155270201199057971076511954045665048965173722209501026611156768988779138868408914387452650147975793533060274322762630 is composite: [27F4F267A7BEF21D] (0.0014s+0.0004s) You tested the centers, you need to test the chain results. In Sunny's paper it describes how to get them, or here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cunningham_chain
|
|
|
|
8bitPunk
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
July 10, 2013, 10:09:25 AM |
|
You are quite right. However, the first probable prime still fails. The positive result is: Primality testing 65004063504559525007738276505391185322137155270201199057971076511954045665048965173722209501026611156768988779138868408914387452650147975793533060274322762631 [N-1/N+1, Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge] Running N-1 test using base 3 Running N-1 test using base 7 Running N+1 test using discriminant 19, base 1+sqrt(19) Calling N-1 BLS with factored part 49.24% and helper 2.29% (150.19% proof) 65004063504559525007738276505391185322137155270201199057971076511954045665048965173722209501026611156768988779138868408914387452650147975793533060274322762631 is prime! (0.0250s+0.0033s)
|
BTC 18bPunkuginRBm1Xz9mcgj8mWJnHDAW5Th | Ł LTCgXEdyBdoQ9WdF6JHi7Pa2EWtzbDjG76 | Ψ ATEBiTLkLpAYeW5hQknUfSvnb7Abbgegku
|
|
|
|
ManBearPig
|
|
July 10, 2013, 11:55:10 AM |
|
This is great!
|
|
|
|
BazkieBumpercar
|
|
July 10, 2013, 12:05:17 PM |
|
Woot! Not sure it's me, I sent some stuff I mined on windows to my linux wallet and then destroyed the windows wallet Anyway, very cool
|
|
|
|
Tjopper
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 146
Merit: 100
Co-Founder @ Blocktrail
|
|
July 10, 2013, 12:10:15 PM |
|
Impressive! But not mine :S
|
|
|
|
Kiaya
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
July 10, 2013, 12:21:40 PM |
|
Amazing result. I was close - but no cigar.
|
|
|
|
n4ru
|
|
July 10, 2013, 01:25:17 PM |
|
You are quite right. However, the first probable prime still fails. The positive result is: Primality testing 65004063504559525007738276505391185322137155270201199057971076511954045665048965173722209501026611156768988779138868408914387452650147975793533060274322762631 [N-1/N+1, Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge] Running N-1 test using base 3 Running N-1 test using base 7 Running N+1 test using discriminant 19, base 1+sqrt(19) Calling N-1 BLS with factored part 49.24% and helper 2.29% (150.19% proof) 65004063504559525007738276505391185322137155270201199057971076511954045665048965173722209501026611156768988779138868408914387452650147975793533060274322762631 is prime! (0.0250s+0.0033s)
does this mean it's not actually generating valid primes?
|
|
|
|
Petr1fied
|
|
July 10, 2013, 02:39:41 PM |
|
Both fail on #9 in my Block Crawler: Block 2044Block 5355Of course that is dependent of my code for generating the chain being correct.
|
|
|
|
Sunny King (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1205
Merit: 1010
|
|
July 10, 2013, 02:47:04 PM |
|
Both fail on #9 in my Block Crawler: Block 2044Block 5355Of course that is dependent of my code for generating the chain being correct. You miss the first prime. The first prime is origin+1 for 2CC.
|
|
|
|
Petr1fied
|
|
July 10, 2013, 02:57:18 PM |
|
Both fail on #9 in my Block Crawler: Block 2044Block 5355Of course that is dependent of my code for generating the chain being correct. You miss the first prime. The first prime is origin+1 for 2CC. Fixed.
|
|
|
|
Vorksholk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1713
Merit: 1029
|
|
July 10, 2013, 03:01:27 PM |
|
Awesome! Not mine either, unfortunately.
|
|
|
|
Sunny King (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1205
Merit: 1010
|
|
July 10, 2013, 03:01:56 PM |
|
Good job Petrified! What primality test you are testing on your crawler?
|
|
|
|
Petr1fied
|
|
July 10, 2013, 03:13:35 PM |
|
It's a php function gmp_prob_prime which is part of the GMP (GNU Multiple Precision) extension. It uses Miller-Rabin's probabilistic test to check if a number is a prime.
|
|
|
|
TheSeven
|
|
July 10, 2013, 07:54:05 PM |
|
Hm, none of those are mine so far.
|
My tip jar: 13kwqR7B4WcSAJCYJH1eXQcxG5vVUwKAqY
|
|
|
8bitPunk
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
July 11, 2013, 03:51:31 AM Last edit: July 11, 2013, 08:01:38 AM by 8bitPunk |
|
Is block 2616's TWN8 chain with origin length of 111 digits interesting? edit: Realized that no it wouldn't sit in the top 20 of 'BiTwin Records two links' Bi-twin chain records only count even lengths. So we are waiting for the first TWN10 block (which is the bi-twin of 4 links)
|
BTC 18bPunkuginRBm1Xz9mcgj8mWJnHDAW5Th | Ł LTCgXEdyBdoQ9WdF6JHi7Pa2EWtzbDjG76 | Ψ ATEBiTLkLpAYeW5hQknUfSvnb7Abbgegku
|
|
|
shakezula
|
|
July 11, 2013, 04:08:42 AM |
|
This is AWESOME! Nice work Sunny, glad to have something new and substantial to mine. I love CPU only and hope it stays that way for awhile.
|
|
|
|
maco
|
|
July 11, 2013, 04:10:35 AM |
|
Congrats!
|
|
|
|
|