SMART CASH NVIDIA MINERS *USE ccminer-x64-2.2.3-cuda9 and up the intensity*

[aginghippy]

I was able to increase my hash rate with my single 1080ti @ +70/+570 from and avg of 1250MH/s to almost 3000MH/s from switching to ccminer-x64-2.2.3-cuda9 version and increasing the intensity until it was no longer stable (it'll just shut off your command prompt most likely) and then set it just below that.  

My sweet spot seems to be -i 31, 32 and it crashes, and I have to set the difficulty to 0.5 to avoid repeat shares (added -f 0.5 at the end of the .bat file)

Heed my advice and profit my friends!

if you appreciate my advice feel free to donate  

ShUcF643LRqnwSETZkEVsc1P5YYxUQ9vFg

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1VrzwRz2dAV5N_EcvU3gOlhmU9wt502YJ

^I uploaded the .zip because of the first reply

[damniatx]

Is that even a thing?

edit: NOPE.

[aginghippy]

Is that even a thing?

edit: NOPE.

check link in OP

[cryptowizze]

hmmmm can we get a virus check on the file  Very curious, but not curious enough to download a random file. Sounds amazing if its true though!

[damniatx]

can someone else try please .

edit: NOPE.  NOPE. NOPE. NOPE. NOPE. NOPE. NOPE. NOPE. NOPE. NOPE.

[nsummy]

File that OP is talking about can be found here:  https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases/tag/2.2.3-tpruvot

[wacko]

Is that even a thing?

It's definitely not a thing considering how the OP doesn't even know that high memory clock isn't needed for keccak (he's running +570 where -502 would do just the same). Most likely he's just "multiplying" his reported hashrate with the "-f 0.5" parameter, hence his "almost 3000".

[aginghippy]

Is that even a thing?

It's definitely not a thing considering how the OP doesn't even know that high memory clock isn't needed for keccak (he's running +570 where -502 would do just the same). Most likely he's just "multiplying" his reported hashrate with the "-f 0.5" parameter, hence his "almost 3000".

my .bat "ccminer-x64 -a keccak -o stratum+tcp://pool-us.smartcash.cc:3333 -u tkellgren.SmartPanda -p x -i 27 -f 1.0"

had to lower it because I was getting already sent nonce errors, but now I've gone from (with the same exact batch file) 1220MH/s to 1450MH/s with no changes but switching to the new miner.

as for my memory clock, I also play computer games and mine other algorithms, mainly equihash at the moment.