Devil worshipers cult Illuminati (Bilderberg Group) teaching little kids sex

[ijphlrnxewho]

Devil worshipers cult Illuminati (Bilderberg Group) teaching little kids in school oral sex at age 5 to 8 years old.
Documents provided prove all over America.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gij9Vf_Fxcs

[OverallGreatGuy]

Devil worshipers cult Illuminati (Bilderberg Group) teaching little kids in school oral sex at age 5 to 8 years old.
Documents provided prove all over America.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gij9Vf_Fxcs&list=UUvsye7V9psc-APX6wV1twLg

Yeah yeah.. We know.. They're controlling the weather too right?

[jnagyjr]

Well considering the age range of girls in the Girl Scouts of the USA (I know, not a school organization, but bear with me for a moment) and their pro-promiscuity and pro-abortion literature they put into the hands of these impressionable girls, it isn't a far cry to what the OP is claiming (I didn't bother with the youtube video as the OP apparently doesn't have the first clue in proper grammar, if s/he made the video it's probably even worse).

Also consider that Planned Parenthood has managed, in the north-eastern U.S. to get schools to allow it to provide talks and distribute materials teaching kids about oral sex and fisting.

Oh yeah, parents didn't know about it until after the fact.

So yeah, the OP probably isn't that far off base, given the true existence of the Council on Foreign Relations (and the fact the U.S. government has thanked them publicly for 'telling us what to think') and the Trilateral Commission and their level of influence worldwide.

[OverallGreatGuy]

Well considering the age range of girls in the Girl Scouts of the USA (I know, not a school organization, but bear with me for a moment) and their pro-promiscuity and pro-abortion literature they put into the hands of these impressionable girls, it isn't a far cry to what the OP is claiming (I didn't bother with the youtube video as the OP apparently doesn't have the first clue in proper grammar, if s/he made the video it's probably even worse).

Also consider that Planned Parenthood has managed, in the north-eastern U.S. to get schools to allow it to provide talks and distribute materials teaching kids about oral sex and fisting.

Oh yeah, parents didn't know about it until after the fact.

So yeah, the OP probably isn't that far off base, given the true existence of the Council on Foreign Relations (and the fact the U.S. government has thanked them publicly for 'telling us what to think') and the Trilateral Commission and their level of influence worldwide.

I get that there is probably plenty of stuff being taught to young kids that many would consider wildly inappropriate, and for good reason.  A lot of which is being promoted by groups like Planned Parenthood and others.  I don't see a connection between the CFR or Bilderburg to Girl Scout or elementary school curriculum though... that's a pretty big stretch.  The majority of what's taught in  both of those forums is handled locally.  It's a bit ridiculous to think that the people in the CFR or Bilderburg have the scope, time, or even desire to influence people to that degree.  An even bigger stretch is trying to put some sinister devil worshiping Illuminati motive behind it all.  That's a bit over the top...

I assume you're talking about the Hillary Clinton speech at the CFR when she said something along those lines.  I found it pretty telling as well.  The CFR is composed of some very influential people that probably hold much more sway over federal government policy, and business collusion than anyone would like.  That said, I have serious doubts that what is being taught in some outlier elementry schools, or girlscout meetings is very high on their priority lists...

And you did good to ignore his video.  His link goes to an Adam Kokesh video that has absolutely nothing to do with what he was posting about.

[jnagyjr]

I used to be of a mind that the Bilderburgs, CFR, or TLC (none of which I thought actually existed, I thought they were the fictional organizations from a conspiracy theorist's rantings) had no interest in such affairs, but why do you think even at the local level things seem to head in whatever direction they wish? They may not take direct action but they sure do set the stage for it.

[Rassah]

Better to teach how to do it properly, before the kids start biting and shoving fists into places and causing lacerations and tears.

[jnagyjr]

Better to teach how to do it properly, before the kids start biting and shoving fists into places and causing lacerations and tears.

Better to teach them abstinence and model monogamy instead. Such perverse sexual practices have no place being taught in schools to children.

[Rassah]

Better to teach how to do it properly, before the kids start biting and shoving fists into places and causing lacerations and tears.

Better to teach them abstinence and model monogamy instead. Such perverse sexual practices have no place being taught in schools to children.

Except that "teaching" abstinence literally consists of just, "Kids, don't have sex. End of lesson," and turns out that it doesn't even work.

[Vandroiy]

Okay, something tells me it's forbidden to ask this question because magic brainwash, but: why should we prevent children from having knowledge about sex?

The advantage of civilization is that we can teach our children not to behave like uncivilized animals and save them from learning everything the hard way. Explicitly not teaching them something seems absurd to me.

I can't remember when I was not aware of sex as a concept. It would have been an absurd idea to have unprotected sex while I was underage, since I was obviously not old enough to raise children or whatnot. Save wording I would have given this exact reasoning on the topic back then. It's not a very difficult conclusion.

When I hear about weirdness like pregnant schoolgirls, it's often in the context of religious schools or American culture (or lack of civilization, but that's self-explanatory). Could it be that people are making things worse with this anti-sex-knowledge stance? I could imagine that it's hard to discuss the topic when necessary if the child is not supposed to know about it, let alone mention it.

[niko]

Better to teach how to do it properly, before the kids start biting and shoving fists into places and causing lacerations and tears.

Better to teach them abstinence and model monogamy instead. Such perverse sexual practices have no place being taught in schools to children.

Abstinence and model monogamy, the way they are thought, are perverse sexual practices. I raise my kids so that know themselves, learn to judge consequences of their actions, and claim freedom and responsibility for their own actions.
Between your "abstinence" and the underlying ideology, and sex education, I gladly choose the latter, thank you. I grew up in  a country where sex education was taught in elementary school, and where - at the time - I was perfectly free to buy porn magazines in press kiosks as a teenager, and where public TV used to broadcast artistic movies with sometime strong sexual content. Most of my peers and I grew up perfectly happy, responsible individuals.
I then moved to the U.S., and was shocked with all the sex-fear, extremes on both ends of the dispute, and even the existence of this whole dispute. Sure enough, I discovered that many sex-oppressed kids in the U.S. grew into immature, sex-obsessed, confused, disoriented teenagers. Same with alcohol. Same with drugs.
A friendly, but futile advice to my American friends: relax. It's okay. Teach yourselves and your kids about life, world, sex, love, personal responsibility, and freedom. Enjoy life, sex included. Be reasonable. 

[jnagyjr]

Who said anything about not teaching them about sex? Abstinence education is more than "just don't have sex." If that is all you are teaching, then its no wonder it's failed. On the flip side of that, though, fisting has no place and is the real perversion. I'm not sure how anyone sees monogamy as being perverse, but whatever. Continue to drink the kool-aid and all will be well.

[Rassah]

What's the difference between abstinence education and regular sex Ed, if, as you suggest, they both teach how the reproductive system works, and how to have safe sex with contraceptives? And, honestly, what's wrong with fisting?

[OverallGreatGuy]

I think parents should be free to teach their children whatever they think is best at whatever age they think is best.  There is never going to be a consensus about issues like this among everyone.  The problem comes when we have a one-size-fits-all public school system where regardless of when or if they decide to teach kids about sex, someone is not going to be happy about it.  If education was completely privatized, parents would have a choice to send their kid to whatever school most aligns with their desired curriculum.

[BitcoinBarrel]

Why don't they let the parents teach the children or wait till high school at least?

[Rassah]

I don't understand what is wrong with teaching kids, or anyone else for that matter, about anything. If you are just giving them facts, what's the harm?

[jnagyjr]

The difference between abstinence education and "regular" sex ed should be that in abstinence education the CHILDREN are encouraged to wait until marriage. Teaching how the reproductive system works, though, could and should wait until a biology class or the parents teach the children.

There's nothing wrong with fisting if you think your fist was designed to fit into whatever orifice you are trying to shove it. However, since human sexual organs were made to compliment each other (and not random objects and body parts) there is quite a bit wrong with it.

If parents want to teach their kids anything at all, that is up to the parents. The government has no business teaching kids these things, especially without the consent of the parents. If you as a parent want to teach your kids to be perverts, that's your business.

[Rassah]

The difference between abstinence education and "regular" sex ed should be that in abstinence education the CHILDREN are encouraged to wait until marriage. Teaching how the reproductive system works, though, could and should wait until a biology class or the parents teach the children.

But, thanks to the over a decade of trials, we now know this doesn't work, and only leads to more teen pregnancies :p

[jnagyjr]

Cite your sources.

[Rassah]

Cite your sources.

Claims, findings, and sources.
http://advocatesforyouth.org/publications/409

[hawkeye]

The difference between abstinence education and "regular" sex ed should be that in abstinence education the CHILDREN are encouraged to wait until marriage. 

Do people still do that?   Wait until marriage?  I thought that went out last century.  Maybe we should bring back chastity belts and such.

There's nothing wrong with fisting if you think your fist was designed to fit into whatever orifice you are trying to shove it. However, since human sexual organs were made to compliment each other (and not random objects and body parts) there is quite a bit wrong with it.

Not the "X wasn't supposed to do that and so therefore it's wrong" argument.      

I suppose you think there's something wrong with homosexuality too?   
 
Do you own a bible?