AllahCoin

[ahmed_bodi]

meh, i could agree with that. IMHO the basics of it all is. Todays Rich countries e.g. US, UK, Russia. etc always have and always will use their money to control the world. Just as in the past they invaded the majority of todays poor countries and left them worthless. Im pretty sure These Rich Countries arent called terrorist states tho, They use their loopholes to hide their crimes.

EDIT: yeah i know my above post wasnt to do with religion it was just to do with getting the land and making croatia better

[lucazane]

meh, i could agree with that. IMHO the basics of it all is. Todays Rich countries e.g. US, UK, Russia. etc always have and always will use their money to control the world. Just as in the past they invaded the majority of todays poor countries and left them worthless. Im pretty sure These Rich Countries arent called terrorist states tho, They use their loopholes to hide their crimes.

EDIT: yeah i know my above post wasnt to do with religion it was just to do with getting the land and making croatia better

What about all the arabian and muslim country who exploited and enslaved africa during 2000 Years ?. It's a bit easy to put everything on the back of US EU & Russia.

[jackjack]

**4. NOT related to any specific religion. But nearly always related to some religion, whatever it is

ha ha you didn't answer my first response : D

nope sorry wrong , Communism is a great example , early pure Communism .

Nazis {as fashionable as they were and still apparently are} were completely Secular "in a fashion" but {the Propaganda aside}  it was the low IQ guards , common criminals that perpetuated a lot of the crimes..

where else lets think ....

there are so many in history - help me out guys .... lets see , the USA dropped two Nuclear Weapons on at that time Defenseless Japan,{civilian areas}  many would say the people that chose to do this were of particularly low IQ.

although the pilot was fairly educated as he apparently killed himself. {not being able to live with the mass murder} -

hmmm who else........

** in fact the President was saying just the other day that - he didn't think that even Stalin would have dropped a Nuclear Weapon on say Berlin in 1945  , perhaps in 41 or early 42 maybe, but {of course its conjecture} but he was pretty confident that Stalin wouldn't have dropped it when the war was over.   yet Japan got double whammy, when the war was over.  {after continuous fire bombing of wooden houses in civilian areas }

you see so Terrorism is not defined by Religion ... don't believe me...

ask the UN , all the countries of the world {not the looser countries ...jokes}  tried to Define "Terrorism" and managed to figure out they were all "Terrorists" , so we have no UN definition. : (

dam you know,  it would have been really good to be able to pin that one down.  

Wow
Are you the alt of Vlad2vlad??


To respond:
USSR:

The Soviet Union was the first state to have, as an ideological objective, the elimination of religion and its replacement with universal atheism

And this is a kind of religion. (Religion is an organized collection of beliefs, cultural systems, and world views that relate humanity to the supernatural, and to spirituality)

Oh wait, "pure Communism"?
Well, pure communism doesn't condone anything like murders.

Nazies:

The Nazi Party Programme of 1920 endorsed Positive Christianity to combat “the Jewish-materialist spirit”. It was a modified version of Christianity which emphasized racial purity and nationalism.

[ahmed_bodi]

erm your contradicting yourself, the NAZI party promoted killing because they were combatting jewish materialistic spirit. and they did this by killing them and working them to death treating them like animals

[pheaonix]

the difference between the crusades and islamic terrorists is that one group is active /right now/ using tactics from the /dark ages/.

i encourage everyone to watch these videos on the subject.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JskqoQLlATs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ib9rofXQl6w

[ahmed_bodi]

right because those videos arent biased right

[digitalindustry]

meh, i could agree with that. IMHO the basics of it all is. Todays Rich countries e.g. US, UK, Russia. etc always have and always will use their money to control the world. Just as in the past they invaded the majority of todays poor countries and left them worthless. Im pretty sure These Rich Countries arent called terrorist states tho, They use their loopholes to hide their crimes.

EDIT: yeah i know my above post wasnt to do with religion it was just to do with getting the land and making croatia better

What about all the arabian and muslim country who exploited and enslaved africa during 2000 Years ?. It's a bit easy to put everything on the back of US EU & Russia.

Also I don't really see the world as "Rich" Countries and "Poor" counties , there are "innovative nations" and then there are "not so innovative nations" , sometimes the Low IQ people that get into government,  for what ever reason {yes sometimes sponsored by others} - well they write very bad policy, bad policy = bad law and , low incentive for innovation.

yes is was defining  "Pure communism" as against say Stalinist ideology , which was more dictatorial , closer to i guess, Germany under Nazis or say The USA presently.

I just meant the start of communism when they were pretty much murdering everyone .

no sorry there was no specific Nazi Religious laws or any specific Communist Laws that were a part of the legal structure of the state or very pushed by the government  , there were laws of Racial purity of the NAZI party which was law , such as the modern Israeli laws/implications. .

[nawazish1]

right because those videos arent biased right

It seems that the debate is on it's last stages. But the problem is the coin is as it is.

[digitalindustry]

right because those videos arent biased right

It seems that the debate is on it's last stages. But the problem is the coin is as it is.

nope the "coin" is no problem at all - they could make a coin with literally anything on it - if anyone gets excited about a picture or a word or a coin, and finds it offensive then , don't look , listen or talk to it.

unless said entity is inhibiting your personal "freedom or human rights" then in an = manner you or i should not inhibit some other entity(s) rights , and we may disagree and voice our opinion and that opinion should have equal standing in all other opinion and not be censored and be treated in reasonable circumstances.

[nawazish1]

right because those videos arent biased right

It seems that the debate is on it's last stages. But the problem is the coin is as it is.

nope the "coin" is no problem at all - they could make a coin with literally anything on it - if anyone gets excited about a picture or a word or a coin, and finds it offensive then , don't look , listen or talk to it.

unless said entity is inhibiting your personal "freedom or human rights" then in an = manner you or i should not inhibit some other entity(s) rights , and we may disagree and voice our opinion and that opinion should have equal standing in all other opinion and not be censored and be treated in reasonable circumstances.

Well if I talk about my opinion then I don't like the picture on it and the name. It is just my opinion and I am not imposing it on anyone else. And I think almost all Muslims will hate this kind of thing.

[ahmed_bodi]

agreed bhai!

[digitalindustry]

right because those videos arent biased right

It seems that the debate is on it's last stages. But the problem is the coin is as it is.

nope the "coin" is no problem at all - they could make a coin with literally anything on it - if anyone gets excited about a picture or a word or a coin, and finds it offensive then , don't look , listen or talk to it.

unless said entity is inhibiting your personal "freedom or human rights" then in an = manner you or i should not inhibit some other entity(s) rights , and we may disagree and voice our opinion and that opinion should have equal standing in all other opinion and not be censored and be treated in reasonable circumstances.

Well if I talk about my opinion then I don't like the picture on it and the name. It is just my opinion and I am not imposing it on anyone else. And I think almost all Muslims will hate this kind of thing.

Honestly i didn't even look at it , i generally don't waste my time with such things.

i will now. I'm sure it will be very shocking for me .

{only because this discussion was useful}

I believe it was the wise words of the Stone Temple Pilots  {formally "Shirley Temple's Pussy"}

"One time a thing occurred to me , what's real and what's for sale." - Vasoline

[BobMarley]

cant download

[jackjack]

cant download

Are you Muslim?

[Snail2]

I guess the dev of this coin is very well entertained now . Step 1 is well done.

Step 2.
Start a coin-crusade/jihad as one party trying to 51, the other party trying to put enough hash to balance the "crusaders". Therefore the two parties together will provide a good stable high network hash-rate. (Todo for the dev: borrow some hash and/or recruit more crusaders/jihadists for the loosing side to maintain status quo)

Step 3.
Provide an exchange where defenders of the faith (from both sides) can attack/defend the value of the coin. You can manipulate the exchange rate with your premined coins if necessary.

Step 4.
When there are enough people on your exchange, dump all your coins to them. -> Cash-out, sunshine, happiness .

[seleme]

Talibans are legends. May Allah swt give them a victory soon.

I haven't visited this thread for few days but all those that commented what I showed with my comments - well, you can still suck my balls you twats, I don't give a flying one what you think about me and what image I leave for islam in your eyes - you're bloody irrelevant.

Islam lived with your hatred for 1500 years, it will live and prosper till Sun shines. You never liked us and you never will until we deny our faith, that's what Allah ALmighty said in His Book, that's what we see on daily basis. So why the hell would I give a flying one what you think about me and my religion? I don't need your love and I'd rather die than be loved by you as being loved by you means being muslim only by name and being your bitch. I'll never be your bitch, you piece of shits, I'd rather die. I enjoy being hated by you as that's great sign I'm doing things good.

Suck it suckers, that's what I think about any islam hater.

[ahmed_bodi]

seleme i can agree you're right in a sense, its proven time and time again. But no taliban aren't legends. After Mohammed S.A.W and muslims ruled the majority of the world. islam was a peaceful religion you and i know that, The Quran itself says not to kill and murder so how can the taliban be right? Yes Things are taken to the extremes because islam has 2 sides, arguments to fit all types of people. But what is right? i think personally the taliban isn't right when killing and murdering people;

[seleme]

Yes, talibans are legends.

I don't buy Taliban image being thrown at me by west media. They are my brothers, making huge sacrifice to live free and to live as islamic as it is possible. We all make mistakes, they do too.

They never attacked anyone, they are defending themselves and have all rights to kill. I am Bosnian and I know few things about that.

Just as Allah swt ordered Muslims to be peaceful He ordered Muslims to fight till they are able to breath if they are attacked.

So, yes - Islam is religion of peace.

So no, if you attack us, we'll stop being religion of piece. We'll fight you as long as we can move our fingers.

[ahmed_bodi]

i agree they are, but yes everyone makes mistakes. all are guilty parties imo

EDIT: definitly agreed there, Its not just quran tho its standard logic if youre getting attacked then obvs your going to fight back

[LosingAlpha]

Talibans are legends. May Allah swt give them a victory soon.

"Legends" don't shoot little girls and burn down schools.