TECSHARE
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 04, 2011, 04:03:34 PM Last edit: August 04, 2011, 04:23:21 PM by tecshare |
|
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/07/18/cern_cosmic_ray_gag/Also finding it hilarious that the warmistas cant seem to provide any sources even after repeated requests from several posters, yet have no problem playing grand inquisitor demanding sources then ignoring them, and playing Miss Cleo divining poster's belief systems.
|
|
|
|
Mageant
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1145
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 04, 2011, 05:02:54 PM |
|
Simply by ignoring all "truths" put out by institutions that are under centralist control and therefore serve their masters and not the objective search for truth.
|
cjgames.com
|
|
|
FirstAscent
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 02, 2011, 02:55:16 AM |
|
Geez, there's a lot of individuals in this thread who are heavily bought into the drivel spewed forth from the brownlash community. To sum up their conclusions: "Yes, my source of information is from Environment & Climate News, clearly the most trusted source in science reporting, even though it's edited by a guy who has no degree in science, and does not ever practice science, but instead is an advocate of property rights."
I'm sure they'll trot out the Oregon Institute petition next.
|
|
|
|
stevendobbs
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 06, 2011, 02:58:14 PM |
|
"Seriously, though, how would a libertarian society address global warming?"
lol - pretty easily -
just deny that it exists at all. slur the science and run a deception campaign.
|
|
|
|
FirstAscent
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 06, 2011, 03:05:18 PM |
|
"Seriously, though, how would a libertarian society address global warming?"
lol - pretty easily -
just deny that it exists at all. slur the science and run a deception campaign.
You are exactly correct. See this thread for examples of how they deceive: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=40283.0
|
|
|
|
JoelKatz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1012
Democracy is vulnerable to a 51% attack.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 06, 2011, 05:22:56 PM |
|
There's a huge incentive to distort the science when universal acceptance of global warming means a coercive government will place onerous restrictions on people. There is no incentive to distort the science when universal acceptance of global warming does not mean widespread economy-killing coercion.
So, on the "head in the sand" front, a Libertarian society would have huge advantages over ones like ours.
|
I am an employee of Ripple. Follow me on Twitter @JoelKatz 1Joe1Katzci1rFcsr9HH7SLuHVnDy2aihZ BM-NBM3FRExVJSJJamV9ccgyWvQfratUHgN
|
|
|
JeffK
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
I never hashed for this...
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 06, 2011, 07:05:39 PM |
|
There's a huge incentive to distort the science when universal acceptance of global warming means a coercive government will place onerous restrictions on people. There is no incentive to distort the science when universal acceptance of global warming does not mean widespread economy-killing coercion.
So, on the "head in the sand" front, a Libertarian society would have huge advantages over ones like ours.
Thanks for your completely theoretical speculation
|
|
|
|
JoelKatz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1012
Democracy is vulnerable to a 51% attack.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 06, 2011, 09:31:06 PM |
|
Thanks for your completely theoretical speculation. If you think there's something wrong with it, please feel free to say so. But "That's what you think" just isn't constructive.
|
I am an employee of Ripple. Follow me on Twitter @JoelKatz 1Joe1Katzci1rFcsr9HH7SLuHVnDy2aihZ BM-NBM3FRExVJSJJamV9ccgyWvQfratUHgN
|
|
|
stevendobbs
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 06, 2011, 09:38:34 PM |
|
There's a huge incentive to distort the science when universal acceptance of global warming means a coercive government will place onerous restrictions on people. There is no incentive to distort the science when universal acceptance of global warming does not mean widespread economy-killing coercion.
So, on the "head in the sand" front, a Libertarian society would have huge advantages over ones like ours.
There is a huge incentive for those who have invested massive emotional capital in libertarianism - to subvert the science as widespread acceptance of the science tends to destroy libertarianism - why? because the libertarians have nailed their ideas to the mast of denialism. Ecological Services are worth a huge component of the total global economy - yet to value ecological services, you require intervention in the market. libertarian political economy represents economy killing ideas.
|
|
|
|
bitconformist
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 06, 2011, 09:41:50 PM |
|
There's a huge incentive to distort the science when universal acceptance of global warming means a coercive government will place onerous restrictions on people. There is no incentive to distort the science when universal acceptance of global warming does not mean widespread economy-killing coercion.
So, on the "head in the sand" front, a Libertarian society would have huge advantages over ones like ours.
The problem with this is that a more libertarian society would have the denial crowd spreading bigger lies: there's nothing to prevent a polluting industry from paying people for fabrications. There is an incentive to lie because even in an environment without class action lawsuits, industries would still need to maintain a public image. Besides, simple facts of human nature like negative externalities and the tragedy of the commons mean that while this evil "coercion" would not exist, nor would any other force to prevent global catastrophe.
|
|
|
|
FirstAscent
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 06, 2011, 09:46:53 PM |
|
There's a huge incentive to distort the science when universal acceptance of global warming means a coercive government will place onerous restrictions on people. There is no incentive to distort the science when universal acceptance of global warming does not mean widespread economy-killing coercion.
So, on the "head in the sand" front, a Libertarian society would have huge advantages over ones like ours.
The problem with this is that a more libertarian society would have the denial crowd spreading bigger lies: there's nothing to prevent a polluting industry from paying people for fabrications. This already happens on a regular basis, by the libertarian 'think tanks'. See this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=40283.0
|
|
|
|
JoelKatz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1012
Democracy is vulnerable to a 51% attack.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 06, 2011, 10:43:58 PM |
|
There's a huge incentive to distort the science when universal acceptance of global warming means a coercive government will place onerous restrictions on people. There is no incentive to distort the science when universal acceptance of global warming does not mean widespread economy-killing coercion.
So, on the "head in the sand" front, a Libertarian society would have huge advantages over ones like ours.
The problem with this is that a more libertarian society would have the denial crowd spreading bigger lies: there's nothing to prevent a polluting industry from paying people for fabrications. There is an incentive to lie because even in an environment without class action lawsuits, industries would still need to maintain a public image. Besides, simple facts of human nature like negative externalities and the tragedy of the commons mean that while this evil "coercion" would not exist, nor would any other force to prevent global catastrophe. I don't follow the argument. Yes, I agree that some of the motivations would exist even in a Libertarian society. But certainly some of the biggest motivations (the fear of a massive, coercive, economy-killing government response) would not. So I don't see why you think it would be "bigger lies".
|
I am an employee of Ripple. Follow me on Twitter @JoelKatz 1Joe1Katzci1rFcsr9HH7SLuHVnDy2aihZ BM-NBM3FRExVJSJJamV9ccgyWvQfratUHgN
|
|
|
JoelKatz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1012
Democracy is vulnerable to a 51% attack.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 06, 2011, 10:45:27 PM |
|
There is a huge incentive for those who have invested massive emotional capital in libertarianism - to subvert the science as widespread acceptance of the science tends to destroy libertarianism - why? because the libertarians have nailed their ideas to the mast of denialism. But that's because they see denialism as a way to prevent massive increases in government power. If there was no threat of a coercive government response to global warming, why would Libertarians particularly care one way or the other?
|
I am an employee of Ripple. Follow me on Twitter @JoelKatz 1Joe1Katzci1rFcsr9HH7SLuHVnDy2aihZ BM-NBM3FRExVJSJJamV9ccgyWvQfratUHgN
|
|
|
FirstAscent
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 06, 2011, 10:49:33 PM |
|
There is a huge incentive for those who have invested massive emotional capital in libertarianism - to subvert the science as widespread acceptance of the science tends to destroy libertarianism - why? because the libertarians have nailed their ideas to the mast of denialism. But that's because they see denialism as a way to prevent massive increases in government power. If there was no threat of a coercive government response to global warming, why would Libertarians particularly care one way or the other? Perhaps you should rethink your insistent use of the term 'coercive government'. There are other possibilities, such as 'collective action', or 'majority defined regulations'. Whatever the case, consistent and widespread proactively organized action is necessary to address environmental issues.
|
|
|
|
The Script
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 06, 2011, 10:57:52 PM |
|
There is a huge incentive for those who have invested massive emotional capital in libertarianism - to subvert the science as widespread acceptance of the science tends to destroy libertarianism - why? because the libertarians have nailed their ideas to the mast of denialism. But that's because they see denialism as a way to prevent massive increases in government power. If there was no threat of a coercive government response to global warming, why would Libertarians particularly care one way or the other? Perhaps you should rethink your insistent use of the term 'coercive government'. There are other possibilities, such as 'collective action', or 'majority defined regulations'. Whatever the case, consistent and widespread proactively organized action is necessary to address environmental issues. These are all coercive by definition. Your philosophy is a philosophy of might makes right and mob rule.
|
|
|
|
FirstAscent
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 06, 2011, 11:03:37 PM |
|
These are all coercive by definition. Your philosophy is a philosophy of might makes right and mob rule.
So what? Call it what you want. What needs to be done needs to be done.
|
|
|
|
Explodicle
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 06, 2011, 11:21:30 PM |
|
These are all coercive by definition. Your philosophy is a philosophy of might makes right and mob rule.
So what? Call it what you want. What needs to be done needs to be done. In theory a free market should be able to acknowledge anthropogenic global warming and self-regulate. It's only high transaction costs preventing that from happening already. Imagine a whole bunch of Anarchist groups mutually agreeing to the Kyoto protocol, or something similar. Yeah something should be done, but who and how are very important details. Any solution that doesn't work with both states and anarchist communities is not a realistic one.
|
|
|
|
FirstAscent
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 06, 2011, 11:59:03 PM |
|
These are all coercive by definition. Your philosophy is a philosophy of might makes right and mob rule.
So what? Call it what you want. What needs to be done needs to be done. In theory a free market should be able to acknowledge anthropogenic global warming and self-regulate. It's only high transaction costs preventing that from happening already. Imagine a whole bunch of Anarchist groups mutually agreeing to the Kyoto protocol, or something similar. Well, gee, imagine them not agreeing. For example, those libertarian think tank members over at Heartland Institute. I use the term 'think tank' lightly here - that's what they call themselves.
|
|
|
|
bitrebel
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 07, 2011, 12:21:54 AM |
|
You don't honestly believe in this, do you? Quack science!
|
Why does Bitrebel have 65+ Ignores? Because Bitrebel says things that some people do not want YOU to hear.
|
|
|
FirstAscent
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 07, 2011, 12:24:39 AM |
|
You don't honestly believe in this, do you? Quack science!
What exactly is quack science? Clarify.
|
|
|
|
|