Bitcoin Forum
December 13, 2024, 11:24:14 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: strange account?  (Read 357 times)
Makingsure (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 10

Judge a Man not by his postcount,but by activity


View Profile
December 11, 2017, 04:53:16 AM
 #1

hi, i noticed a strange account and just wondering if anyone sees the same.
starts with a scammer:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=231646   --   this user has an interesting history

check out their only SENT positive feedback, (risked amount 120BTC?!?)  it goes to this guy, who is this guy...
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=128900  "This user's password was reset recently.  This user's email address was changed recently.  "
 
hacked sold account? (btcdigger2013)
 Sad

p.s: i used an old alt i never knew i controlled anymore to post this, cool haha
KWH
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960
Merit: 1052

In Collateral I Trust.


View Profile
December 11, 2017, 11:07:35 AM
 #2

hi, i noticed a strange account and just wondering if anyone sees the same.
starts with a scammer:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=231646   --   this user has an interesting history

check out their only SENT positive feedback, (risked amount 120BTC?!?)  it goes to this guy, who is this guy...
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=128900  "This user's password was reset recently.  This user's email address was changed recently.  "
 
hacked sold account? (btcdigger2013)
 Sad

p.s: i used an old alt i never knew i controlled anymore to post this, cool haha


General rule of thumb I use is: No Reference, I treat most as a Neutral or I overlook it.
User looks like a troll.

When the subject of buying BTC with Paypal comes up, I often remember this: 

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

Albert Einstein
Timelord2067
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3892
Merit: 2254


💲🏎️💨🚓


View Profile
December 11, 2017, 03:42:08 PM
 #3

SXC is the symbol for SexCoin while CanaryInTheMine (who recently recovered their account after it was hacked) is a supporter in the wider SexCoin community.

There's some mining rigs being set up to ensure stability in the SXC network, perhaps that relates to the purchase of those rigs?

I'll flag this in the SXC forum and see if anyone recognises the UID SXC.

One of the original Dev's of SexCoin was LittleDigger (who's account I suspect has been hacked as it came back to life a few weeks ago after a two plus year absence) perhaps the third UID you mention bitdigger2013 is an earlier incarnation of LittleDigger?

lavajumper
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 876
Merit: 1037


Sexcoin Core Dev Team Member


View Profile
December 11, 2017, 05:07:13 PM
Last edit: December 11, 2017, 05:23:45 PM by lavajumper
 #4

I believe this account ( SxC ) was created shortly after the 2013 SXC pump. Judging by the posts, I'm pretty sure this account was hacked/sold off/transferred.
He DID post on the old sexcoin threads back around 2014... but tbh, I don't think he was ever really active nor gained any trust from the sexcoin community at that time.

Take a look at his post history and notice the gaps, and also the change in tone of the posts.

EDIT: for pronoun clarity

SXC: S7NgcaY5qtjsBpNqdJsYbeTjacwuCUhC2Z | LTC: LVmkQd2T5nffVf1Bum9GzbNTaEQBXxURo9 | BTC: 17H4ut7WeaUkVkNh3UfvQArvsawabmrvg4 | http://sexcoinforum.com | Bitrated user: Lavajumper.
onnz423
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 508


Make winning bets on sports with Sportsbet.io!


View Profile
December 11, 2017, 07:47:25 PM
 #5

The user has alot of negative feedback (without any real positive feedback), so i guess that they are not really that trustworthy at all.
However i think that, that 120 BTC feedback might be very fake as well, because i don't see a way that a Sr. Member wouldn't run with that amount, because that's alot of money

   ▄▄██████▄▄
  ████████████
███▄▄
 ██████████████▀▀▀██▄
████████████████   ▀██▄
████████████████     ▀██
██████████████       ██▌
██████████████        ▐██
██▌▀▀██████▀▀         ▐██
▐██                   ██▌
 ██▄                 ▄██
  ▀██▄             ▄██▀
    ▀██▄▄▄     ▄▄▄██▀
      ▀▀█████████▀▀





███████████████████████████
████████▀▀       ▀▀████████
█████▀   ▄ ▀███▀ ▄   ▀█████
████  ▄████▄ ▀ ▄████▄  ████
███  ▄ ▀███▀ ▄ ▀███▀ ▄  ███
██  ▄██ ▀▀ ▄███▄ ▀▀ ██▄  ██
██  █▀ ▄█ ███████ █▄ ▀█  ██
██   ▄███▄ █████ ▄███▄   ██
███  ████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄ ▀████  ███
████  ▀ ▄ ▀█████▀ ▄ ▀  ████
█████▄  ▀▀▄ ███ ▄▀▀  ▄█████
████████▄▄       ▄▄████████
███████████████████████████





█▀▀











█▄▄
▀▀█











▄▄█
█▀▀











█▄▄
▀▀█











▄▄█
eddie13
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 2271


BTC or BUST


View Profile
December 11, 2017, 08:14:15 PM
 #6

i don't see a way that a Sr. Member wouldn't run with that amount, because that's alot of money

So not trust you with more than your account is worth check..

Chancellor on Brink of Second Bailout for Banks
Timelord2067
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3892
Merit: 2254


💲🏎️💨🚓


View Profile
December 11, 2017, 11:42:57 PM
 #7

The user has alot of negative feedback (without any real positive feedback), so i guess that they are not really that trustworthy at all.
However i think that, that 120 BTC feedback might be very fake as well, because i don't see a way that a Sr. Member wouldn't run with that amount, because that's alot of money

Since theymos removed part of the Trust Wall feature which showed the level of trust of the one posting it's becoming a little grey as to the validity of posts on the trust wall.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!