You guys complaining about GPU mining not being profitable apparently don't live in Alaska
Up here, GPU mining is a godsend. I'll explain why:
1 gallon of #1 heating fuel weighs ~3.100kg and where I live costs roughly $5.85.
The higher heating value of #1 HHF is around 4.64x10^7 J/kg.
So, that gallon of #1 HHF can ideally yield 143840000 Joules of energy, equivalent to 39.96 kWh.
Power here costs $0.195 / kWh. So that $5.85 gallon of fuel has the same amount of heat as you could produce with about $7.79 of electricity.
You can see where I'm going with this.
Say I have a 1600W mining rig that pulls ~ 3.6Mh/s mining LTC: this rig draws about $7.80 worth of power per 24 hours, producing about the same amount of heat in the process as a gallon of fuel. This puts my adjusted power cost for the rig at $1.95 per 24h.
So, given a conservative LTC price of $1.95/ea, this 3.6Mh rig only needs to be able to produce slightly over 1 LTC per day to be profitable.
That should be about the time the difficulty hits ~4000.
And I sincerely doubt that most other LTC miners will keep mining at that point unless the price of an LTC goes up.
In a given winter (6 months) a single family home up here will use 600 gallons of heating fuel, or $3500. This can be almost entirely replaced by around 5.5kW of GPUs (12.5 Mh or so). In 6 months at a median difficulty of 2000 that will cost me around $4600 and net me 1100LTC. Even at $2/LTC, that's almost $1000 savings over heating fuel.
Thoughts?