[ANN][ARG] Argentum || Secure. Rare. Fast. || Randomized reward system commodity

[xredirector]

Hey guys, have a question for you.

Please notice two blockheights: 454501 and 428209

After I "fix" EXCEPTION: 11DbException Db::put: Cannot allocate memory Argentum in ProcessMessages()

I am getting into REORGANIZE, which after completion pushes my argentumd to get the chain with higher blockheights (454501).

Which blockchaing is correct?
I can ban 109.190.165.148 after all and keep on 428209.

06/04/14 17:38:25 send version message: version 1030000, blocks=428209, us=209.195.112.50:13581, them=109.190.165.148:57450, peer=109.190.165.148:57450
06/04/14 17:38:25 Added time data, samples 7, offset +7 (+0 minutes)
06/04/14 17:38:25 nTimeOffset = +0  (+0 minutes)
06/04/14 17:38:25 receive version message: version 1030000, blocks=454501, us=209.195.112.50:13580, them=109.190.165.148:13581, peer=109.190.165.148:57450
...
06/04/14 17:38:42 received block 8deb4c4ec7c39207b048
06/04/14 17:38:42 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=17ffd930b7805df9d4d8
06/04/14 17:38:48 received block 7b136ae32998a9bbebe3
06/04/14 17:38:49 Postponing 21 reconnects
06/04/14 17:38:49 REORGANIZE
06/04/14 17:38:49 REORGANIZE: Disconnect 2128 blocks; acad37b177bc5a338290..843a21aeef874fdd60bb
06/04/14 17:38:49 REORGANIZE: Connect 2298 blocks; acad37b177bc5a338290..d843cb60e839fd2762f0

https://altexplorer.net/chain/Argentum is at 428,209

peerinfo:

    {
        "addr" : "162.243.226.39",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1401906083,
        "lastrecv" : 1401905495,
        "conntime" : 1401903332,
        "version" : 1030000,
        "subver" : "/ARG V1.2:1.0.3/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 428209,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "46.119.36.123",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1401906101,
        "lastrecv" : 1401906101,
        "conntime" : 1401903332,
        "version" : 1030000,
        "subver" : "/ARG V1.2:1.0.3/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 428209,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "72.78.100.9",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1401906101,
        "lastrecv" : 1401906101,
        "conntime" : 1401903332,
        "version" : 1030000,
        "subver" : "/ARG V1.2:1.0.3/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 428209,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "54.201.183.106",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1401906102,
        "lastrecv" : 1401906102,
        "conntime" : 1401903332,
        "version" : 1030000,
        "subver" : "/ARG V1.2:1.0.3/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 428209,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "192.99.44.51",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1401906083,
        "lastrecv" : 1401905068,
        "conntime" : 1401903332,
        "version" : 1030000,
        "subver" : "/ARG V1.2:1.0.3/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 428209,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "109.190.165.148:57450",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1401906083,
        "lastrecv" : 1401906083,
        "conntime" : 1401903505,
        "version" : 1030000,
        "subver" : "/ARG V1.2:1.0.3/",
        "inbound" : true,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 454501,
        "banscore" : 0
    }

Which block are you on?

Thank you

[cryptmebro]

Current block is 454668,the block explorers are wrong, look at your argentum client for correct information

Edit: for clarification, the block explorer's haven't applied the db fix a few pages back.

[xredirector]

Is Argentum windows client always a source of truth?

I am at 454629, few blocks behind I guess (was not sure it is correct). My server is at 209.195.112.50 if you want to connect.

What are the good server IPs I could connect to?

Thank you!



{
    "version" : 1000300,
    "protocolversion" : 1030000,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "blocks" : 454629,
    "connections" : 5,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 0.42233779,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1392347456,
    "keypoolsize" : 103,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "mininput" : 0.00010000,
    "errors" : ""
}

[MarKusRomanus]

The source should really be updated.  I would have never found this solution had I not searched recent posts of ahmed_bodi.  I am now reloading the blockchain for Argentum and will reopen the pool at arg.minepool.net soon.

[CartGeezer]

Thanks guys!

[xredirector]

I have updated arg.coinminerpool.com BTW

Who has updated server, can you share the IP please?

[baritus]

I am working on updating ARG to 0.8, that should fix the database issue.

[illymoka]

to be honest, Argentum is considered to be a scamcoin. Diversification is always a good strategy, but with this coins, you increase the risk instead of lowering the chance of a loss.

[CartGeezer]

Argentum is getting ready to have its birthday!

Aren't most 'scamcoins' gone before that?

[CartGeezer]

The source should really be updated.  I would have never found this solution had I not searched recent posts of ahmed_bodi.  I am now reloading the blockchain for Argentum and will reopen the pool at arg.minepool.net soon.

I joined your pool.  I like the simple interface, just about everything you need without changing pages.  Same software basically as TheBlocksFactory, isn't it?

Wouldn't mind if the User Stats graph worked, just to check if my machine upchucked or I lost internet overnight.  But that's frosting

[cryptmebro]

to be honest, Argentum is considered to be a scamcoin. Diversification is always a good strategy, but with this coins, you increase the risk instead of lowering the chance of a loss.

You're pretty dumb.

[CartGeezer]

to be honest, Argentum is considered to be a scamcoin. Diversification is always a good strategy, but with this coins, you increase the risk instead of lowering the chance of a loss.

You're pretty dumb.

Laf!   

[transit]

ARG gets pumped higher than DGC, less coins and right now it's lower.
Bought a few yesterday.

[socal]

I think ARG could be re - vitalized we just need a media blitz to bring it back into the community's awareness also Baritus PM me I have some ideas that need discussing

[cryptmebro]

Poor ARG, so much potential.

[s4m0ht]

Is not ARG the same coin as DGC? I mean, also maintained by the same devs? Why the huge price difference?

[cryptmebro]

Is not ARG the same coin as DGC? I mean, also maintained by the same devs? Why the huge price difference?

People lost interest.  Crypto is run by pump and dump schemes.  Old coins have lost their luster to people trying to make a quick profit.

[sniveling]

Is not ARG the same coin as DGC? I mean, also maintained by the same devs? Why the huge price difference?

People lost interest.  Crypto is run by pump and dump schemes.  Old coins have lost their luster to people trying to make a quick profit.

Last year it only ha 30 other coins to compete with, this year it has hundreds of other coins to compete with.

[cryptmebro]

Is not ARG the same coin as DGC? I mean, also maintained by the same devs? Why the huge price difference?

People lost interest.  Crypto is run by pump and dump schemes.  Old coins have lost their luster to people trying to make a quick profit.

Last year it only ha 30 other coins to compete with, this year it has hundreds of other coins to compete with.

Hence, my statement.

[moreporknz]

seems to be some movement rececently