hotcoldcoin (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
July 23, 2013, 07:33:09 PM |
|
I think Vlad is sleeping
It is so quiet when Vlad sleeps. But the faithful do not despair. No! For we know, deep down in our hearts, Vlad is now dreaming of new ways to improve the entire global cryptocurrency infrastructure. Joy!
|
|
|
|
frobley
|
|
July 23, 2013, 07:40:14 PM |
|
Trying the new version 1.0.1 windows binary ( https://app.box.com/s/blhmif79kih317yqjm7a ) and all is working as expected. Even mined a block, just for the hell of it. We're at block 3720 now, so we have a bit to go before switchover at block 6677. Enough time for people to decide if they want to join in the fun, and for Vlad to post more interesting and enlightening nuggets of wisdom. about 2 and a half days.. why block 6677? @ 70s/block, mining currently nets 60,480 coins/day? after block 6677, this increases to 181,020 including 12 x bonus blocks, am I right? Low incentive to mine the next 3000 blocks...
|
|
|
|
hotcoldcoin (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
July 23, 2013, 07:58:14 PM |
|
Trying the new version 1.0.1 windows binary ( https://app.box.com/s/blhmif79kih317yqjm7a ) and all is working as expected. Even mined a block, just for the hell of it. We're at block 3720 now, so we have a bit to go before switchover at block 6677. Enough time for people to decide if they want to join in the fun, and for Vlad to post more interesting and enlightening nuggets of wisdom. about 2 and a half days.. why block 6677? @ 70s/block, mining currently nets 60,480 coins/day? after block 6677, this increases to 181,020 including 12 x bonus blocks, am I right? Low incentive to mine the next 3000 blocks... Why 6677? I suggest anything after block 6666 (about double the then current block #) One of those "programmers" added 11, to make it block 6677. I'm sure there's some sacredness and Godly numbers in that calculation if we look hard enough. I dunno about the math part, but I may be bored enough to check it out.
|
|
|
|
hotcoldcoin (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
July 23, 2013, 08:04:39 PM |
|
now if someone with a beefy enough scrypt rig was bored enough, I mean really bored, they could rewrite the entire nuggets blockchain. checkpoints.cpp // // What makes a good checkpoint block? // + Is surrounded by blocks with reasonable timestamps // (no blocks before with a timestamp after, none after with // timestamp before) // + Contains no strange transactions //
// no checkpoint now, can be added in later releases static MapCheckpoints mapCheckpoints = boost::assign::map_list_of ( 0, uint256("0xb0905ab36adbe7c0894b4c4ff9349374052f93799c97760ab5fb207daee741ad"))
;
|
|
|
|
jackjack
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1280
May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage
|
|
July 23, 2013, 08:07:43 PM |
|
now if someone with a beefy enough scrypt rig was bored enough, I mean really bored, they could rewrite the entire nuggets blockchain. checkpoints.cpp // // What makes a good checkpoint block? // + Is surrounded by blocks with reasonable timestamps // (no blocks before with a timestamp after, none after with // timestamp before) // + Contains no strange transactions //
// no checkpoint now, can be added in later releases static MapCheckpoints mapCheckpoints = boost::assign::map_list_of ( 0, uint256("0xb0905ab36adbe7c0894b4c4ff9349374052f93799c97760ab5fb207daee741ad"))
;
Don't dare touch my Nuggets
|
Own address: 19QkqAza7BHFTuoz9N8UQkryP4E9jHo4N3 - Pywallet support: 1AQDfx22pKGgXnUZFL1e4UKos3QqvRzNh5 - Bitcointalk++ script support: 1Pxeccscj1ygseTdSV1qUqQCanp2B2NMM2 Pywallet: instructions. Encrypted wallet support, export/import keys/addresses, backup wallets, export/import CSV data from/into wallet, merge wallets, delete/import addresses and transactions, recover altcoins sent to bitcoin addresses, sign/verify messages and files with Bitcoin addresses, recover deleted wallets, etc.
|
|
|
twobits
|
|
July 24, 2013, 01:30:48 PM |
|
Trying the new version 1.0.1 windows binary ( https://app.box.com/s/blhmif79kih317yqjm7a ) and all is working as expected. Even mined a block, just for the hell of it. We're at block 3720 now, so we have a bit to go before switchover at block 6677. Enough time for people to decide if they want to join in the fun, and for Vlad to post more interesting and enlightening nuggets of wisdom. about 2 and a half days.. why block 6677? @ 70s/block, mining currently nets 60,480 coins/day? after block 6677, this increases to 181,020 including 12 x bonus blocks, am I right? Low incentive to mine the next 3000 blocks... Even with two and a half days, it may not go well Vlad has been constantly saying how it must be hard as no one fixed the code, even though patches were posted the fist day that outlined the fix. So after hearing that for some days, we went and put a repo with a patch and even made a binary. So far though, Vlad has yet to update the original post, or make an announcement that people should update. Somehow he things this fix should magically happen or something.
|
█████ █████ ███████ █████ ███ █████████████ █████ ██ █████████████████ █████ █ ██████ ██████ █████ ████ ████ █████████████ █████ ████ █████████████ █████ ████ █████████████ █████ ████ █████ █████ █████ █ ██████ ███████ █████ ██ ███████████ █████ █████ ███ █████████ ████ █████ █████ ███████ ██ | | | ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ | | | | | | ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ | | ►WhitePaper ►One-Pager | ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ | | | | ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ | | ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ | █████ █████ ███████ █████ ███ █████████████ █████ ██ █████████████████ █████ █ ██████ ██████ █████ ████ ████ █████████████ █████ ████ █████████████ █████ ████ █████████████ █████ ████ █████ █████ █████ █ ██████ ███████ █████ ██ ███████████ █████ █████ ███ █████████ ████ █████ █████ ███████ ██ |
|
|
|
|
frobley
|
|
July 24, 2013, 05:05:15 PM |
|
Trying the new version 1.0.1 windows binary ( https://app.box.com/s/blhmif79kih317yqjm7a ) and all is working as expected. Even mined a block, just for the hell of it. We're at block 3720 now, so we have a bit to go before switchover at block 6677. Enough time for people to decide if they want to join in the fun, and for Vlad to post more interesting and enlightening nuggets of wisdom. about 2 and a half days.. why block 6677? @ 70s/block, mining currently nets 60,480 coins/day? after block 6677, this increases to 181,020 including 12 x bonus blocks, am I right? Low incentive to mine the next 3000 blocks... Even with two and a half days, it may not go well Vlad has been constantly saying how it must be hard as no one fixed the code, even though patches were posted the fist day that outlined the fix. So after hearing that for some days, we went and put a repo with a patch and even made a binary. So far though, Vlad has yet to update the original post, or make an announcement that people should update. Somehow he things this fix should magically happen or something. ...about 400 blocks in last 24 hours, could go to 10 days+ for the bonus blocks to begin appearing, if there's any hash power at all on this coin by then. I don't read Vlad's posts, too much text, and I'm far too busy, there's not a lot of miners on this 'miners' coin though.
|
|
|
|
hotcoldcoin (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
July 24, 2013, 07:20:02 PM |
|
about 2 and a half days.. why block 6677? @ 70s/block, mining currently nets 60,480 coins/day? after block 6677, this increases to 181,020 including 12 x bonus blocks, am I right? Low incentive to mine the next 3000 blocks...
Even with two and a half days, it may not go well Vlad has been constantly saying how it must be hard as no one fixed the code, even though patches were posted the fist day that outlined the fix. So after hearing that for some days, we went and put a repo with a patch and even made a binary. So far though, Vlad has yet to update the original post, or make an announcement that people should update. Somehow he things this fix should magically happen or something. ...about 400 blocks in last 24 hours, could go to 10 days+ for the bonus blocks to begin appearing, if there's any hash power at all on this coin by then. I don't read Vlad's posts, too much text, and I'm far too busy, there's not a lot of miners on this 'miners' coin though. Not many miners at all, less then a single handful surely. Contrarian miners wanting in on possibly the most botched altcoin launch to date. It's good for a laugh. The 70 second per block average, well that's not happening yet. Math Is Hard, but my calcs show it more like 200 seconds per block average so far. It's those darn "High" Diff blocks, you know, like 0.2 and above. Whoa nelly, those massive difficulty blocks are just too much for the network to handle quickly. And the constant question: is Vlad one of the most amazing trolls we've seen so far, or is he actually that insane? I'm betting on the latter. If the net makes it to 6677 and forks, I look forward to his panic posts about why it's all bad and we all stole his coin.
|
|
|
|
hotcoldcoin (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
July 26, 2013, 07:12:30 PM |
|
now if someone with a beefy enough scrypt rig was bored enough, I mean really bored, they could rewrite the entire nuggets blockchain. checkpoints.cpp... Don't dare touch my Nuggets Yummy nuggets! Seems twobits agrees with you: commit 7a8ee1c4242 = 4 + 2 + 4 +2 = 12 = 1 + 2 = 3 again! Must be the meaning of life in that calculation, Fer Sure.
|
|
|
|
diatonic
|
|
July 26, 2013, 07:35:09 PM |
|
You know what's funny is that you "fixed" the VGB protocol that was supposed to hit 12 times a day, but a 0.01% chance is 100 times fewer than 12 times a day.
These God numbers make math hard.
|
|
|
|
diatonic
|
|
July 26, 2013, 08:33:00 PM |
|
I added a proper Abe based block explorer at http://altcha.in/chain/NuggetsPlease send any donation or bounties to NYN3WAEd9TgCKKXVq8cBxCzyH2A7Brs3nb Thanks!
|
|
|
|
twobits
|
|
July 26, 2013, 08:40:18 PM |
|
You know what's funny is that you "fixed" the VGB protocol that was supposed to hit 12 times a day, but a 0.01% chance is 100 times fewer than 12 times a day.
These God numbers make math hard.
Not sure I am getting the humor. What repo are you looking at?
|
█████ █████ ███████ █████ ███ █████████████ █████ ██ █████████████████ █████ █ ██████ ██████ █████ ████ ████ █████████████ █████ ████ █████████████ █████ ████ █████████████ █████ ████ █████ █████ █████ █ ██████ ███████ █████ ██ ███████████ █████ █████ ███ █████████ ████ █████ █████ ███████ ██ | | | ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ | | | | | | ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ | | ►WhitePaper ►One-Pager | ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ | | | | ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ | | ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ | █████ █████ ███████ █████ ███ █████████████ █████ ██ █████████████████ █████ █ ██████ ██████ █████ ████ ████ █████████████ █████ ████ █████████████ █████ ████ █████████████ █████ ████ █████ █████ █████ █ ██████ ███████ █████ ██ ███████████ █████ █████ ███ █████████ ████ █████ █████ ███████ ██ |
|
|
|
|
hotcoldcoin (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
July 26, 2013, 08:45:47 PM |
|
I added a proper Abe based block explorer at http://altcha.in/chain/NuggetsPlease send any donation or bounties to NYN3WAEd9TgCKKXVq8cBxCzyH2A7Brs3nb Thanks! Bounty #14 paid to diatonic! Rock on you crazy nuggie
|
|
|
|
diatonic
|
|
July 26, 2013, 09:34:38 PM |
|
You know what's funny is that you "fixed" the VGB protocol that was supposed to hit 12 times a day, but a 0.01% chance is 100 times fewer than 12 times a day.
These God numbers make math hard.
Not sure I am getting the humor. What repo are you looking at? Looking at https://github.com/knotwork/nuggetsThe code below is the LuckyCoin 0.01% algorithm, which should hit about every 10,000 blocks. else if(nHeight > 250 && nHeight <= 14726880){ nSubsidy = 49 * COIN; //Standard 49 Coin Reward if(rand > 50000 && rand < 50011) nSubsidy = 10045 * COIN; //The super block Protocol Random 250x Block Award } VGB was supposed to be 1%, which should hit about 12 times/day. The LuckyCoin 1% algorithm was else if(rand > 70000 && rand < 71001) Make sense?
|
|
|
|
|
diatonic
|
|
July 26, 2013, 09:40:49 PM |
|
Ah, shit. All this forking and lack of sleep I guess. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
hotcoldcoin (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
July 26, 2013, 09:42:36 PM |
|
Ah, shit. All this forking and lack of sleep I guess. Thanks. Do not despair. The Nugget is a powerful force, capable of curing anyone of the ability to do math, or even logical thinking. That's why we like it!
|
|
|
|
hotcoldcoin (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
July 27, 2013, 11:52:21 AM |
|
Hop Hop Hop. I was bored. I wondered if I could do a PHP script to calculate if the next block will be lucky. Found a PHP library for Mersenne Twister and made this ugly test script: See http://codepad.viper-7.com/CbKeAE for a runable version with the twister library. At the bottom of the code is the nuggie test part: /* ****************************************** */ $prevHash_string = '59cfa10a961c23f1e24c343f7034aae54e28b0d39c18ebe36e72e29f091e9607'; // block 5528
nuggie_bat_shit_crazy( $prevHash_string );
/* ****************************************** */ function nuggie_bat_shit_crazy( $prevHash_string ) {
// std::string cseed_str = prevHash.ToString().substr(55,7); // const char* cseed = cseed_str.c_str(); // long seed = hex2long(cseed); $cseed = substr($prevHash_string, 55,7); $seed = hexdec($cseed);
// int rand = generateMTRandom(seed, 1000000); $twister = new twister($seed); $lower_bound = 1; $upper_bound = 1000000; $rand = $twister->rangeint($lower_bound, $upper_bound);
// if(nHeight > 6677 && rand < 9723) $lucky = 9723; if( $rand < $lucky ) { $next_block = 'BAT SHIT CRAZY!'; } else { $next_block = 'normal'; } print "<pre>"; print "prevHash_string = $prevHash_string\n"; print "cseed = $cseed\n"; print "seed = $seed\n"; print "lower_bound = $lower_bound\n"; print "upper_bound = $upper_bound\n"; print "rand = $rand\n"; print "lucky = $lucky\n"; print "next_block = $next_block\n";
}
output is: prevHash_string = 59cfa10a961c23f1e24c343f7034aae54e28b0d39c18ebe36e72e29f091e9607 cseed = f091e96 seed = 252255894 lower_bound = 1 upper_bound = 1000000 rand = 737819 lucky = 9723 next_block = normal
I have no idea if this test script really matches what the C code does, or if the PHP twister library really works the same as the C one....
|
|
|
|
jackjack
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1280
May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage
|
|
July 27, 2013, 11:53:55 AM |
|
You must be really bored! I'll do the same in Python
|
Own address: 19QkqAza7BHFTuoz9N8UQkryP4E9jHo4N3 - Pywallet support: 1AQDfx22pKGgXnUZFL1e4UKos3QqvRzNh5 - Bitcointalk++ script support: 1Pxeccscj1ygseTdSV1qUqQCanp2B2NMM2 Pywallet: instructions. Encrypted wallet support, export/import keys/addresses, backup wallets, export/import CSV data from/into wallet, merge wallets, delete/import addresses and transactions, recover altcoins sent to bitcoin addresses, sign/verify messages and files with Bitcoin addresses, recover deleted wallets, etc.
|
|
|
frobley
|
|
July 27, 2013, 01:08:02 PM |
|
Possible to mine only bonus blocks? Why would anybody mine the blocks in between? Checked block count now that you've mentioned this, I think it died.
|
|
|
|
|