del

[myself]

del

[superweb]

Liked multipool project, althrought I lost about 0,5BTC in it's ending. Will likely join this one too, but waiting for few people to say they've been paid out. Also the pending time at many pools is very long - need to setup smaller pay limit prbably.

[Mike 71]

Look at my post:
http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=17970.msg316889#msg316889

and a post from Nick later:
http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=17970.msg328233#msg328233

 

No open payouts from multipool for over a week now.
No payouts from multiclone ever

 

[burp]

Are you able to maintain the original multipool code? Otherwise I don't think it's sensible to join.

[Mike 71]

First Multiclone payouts arrived. Thanks for that

Whats up with bitcoins-lc and btcmine pending shares? They are pending since friday. Do you think you can fix that? Or maybe just disable those pools for further mining (if you not sure about we will get paid for all those shares).

[superweb]

Whats up with bitcoins-lc and btcmine pending shares? They are pending since friday. Do you think you can fix that? Or maybe just disable those pools for further mining (if you not sure about we will get paid for all those shares).

Yes, waiting for this to be solved..then going to point some MHashes to multiclone..

[koopa]

Yes, confirmed - I too received my first payout - thanks nick. Pointed my rigs over there for about 18 hours when multiclone was new to test it out.

However, I am waiting for the pending shares issue to be resolved before sending any MH/s to multiclone again. These pending shares represent nearly 70% of my total work done, so would obviously like to see this resolved.

Thanks.

[gno]

I got my payment yesterday for the shares that are showing as earned.  The pending stuff is still pending.

[nick5429]

Just wanted to clarify for the 100th time: btcmine and bitcoins-lc will pay out and it's not a problem with your personal shares that they're still pending.  I just need some time to update the pool's rewards code to process those rewards.  I'll try to get to it this weekend.

Since the code is open source, anyone else is free to update the code as well and I can easily incorporate that into Multiclone to get this payout done faster.

The Multiclone pool has received payments from both of these pools, it just doesn't know how to split them up among the users yet.  You will eventually get paid.

If you all want, I can remove these pools as targets until this is resolved.  But I think this will reduce the pool hopping benefit quite a bit....

[Mike 71]

Hello Nick,

thank you for your answer and your work for a new multipool!

Maybe you should announce important stuff like this in your own thread (as you did right now). I havnt noticed this and i am bit bit cautious because we still waiting for out last (original) multipool BCs.

What you wrote is enough for me to point my miners back to your pool.

For the code, i cant help because i never made anything in perl and dont got the time to just learn something new yet. In fact, i am not able to get a multipool instance running without going deeper in some documentation or searches (i administrated some debian router/fileserver some years ago and had some kornshell experience, but that will not help here).

[nick5429]

The new thread for Multiclone is a good idea -- I had intended to start one once I had worked out the remaining kinks with Multiclone.  I'll probably start my own Multiclone thread (so I can own/edit/etc the main post) in a few days.

Anyway, I think I figured out the issue with the recent flakyness -- it had to do with a partial removal of the solo pool I tried to do, while maintaining pool protection.

I've reverted that tweak, so let's hope things are more solid now.

[gno]

Thanks for the clarification nick.  I looked at some of the other rewards code and can appreciate that its not going to be a five minute job.

[Zoomer]

I'd think the better fallback would be a SMPPS pool, since that by definition would have a utility of 1.0. With the hashrate devoted to solo on multiclone, I feel that the pool would have to be even luckier than arsbc to get anything.

[organofcorti]

I'd think the better fallback would be a SMPPS pool, since that by definition would have a utility of 1.0. With the hashrate devoted to solo on multiclone, I feel that the pool would have to be even luckier than arsbc to get anything.

+1

[luffy]

i see slush into multiclone shares! i though only real prop. pools are on it! 

[zoro]

is this normal from deepbit?
135301   Fri Jul 8 13:09:21 2011   20   19.278   0.00000000   0.000   0.00000000
135300   Fri Jul 8 13:03:03 2011   13   15.489   0.00000000   0.000   0.00000000
135299   Fri Jul 8 12:48:40 2011   4   4.321   0.00000000   0.000   0.00000000
135298   Fri Jul 8 12:40:01 2011   15   19.658   0.00000000   0.000   0.00000000
135296   Fri Jul 8 12:28:09 2011   21   22.369   0.00000000   0.000   0.00000000
135295   Fri Jul 8 12:01:56 2011   26   26.617   0.00000000   0.000   0.00000000
135293   Fri Jul 8 11:56:22 2011   25   24.605   0.00000000   0.000   0.00000000
135291   Fri Jul 8 11:39:03 2011   12   11.233   0.00042231   1.100   0.00000202
135290   Fri Jul 8 11:16:05 2011   30   34.810   0.00064758   0.675   0.00000000

[superweb]

i see slush into multiclone shares! i though only real prop. pools are on it! 

According to what author of multipool said, score based pools should also be effective in the hopping-mix..less than proportional, but sometimes, when other pools having long rounds, the system decides to switch to slush. I had efficiency on slush with multipool about 1,3..

[Houseonfire]

Heres the code for minecoin. Is it in your pools.conf?

Code:

minecoin
mineco.in:3000
https://mineco.in/stats.json
$time=~s/^.*"duration":(\d+).*$/$1/;$shares=~s/^.*"shares_this_round":(\d+).*/$1/;$rate=~s/^.*"hashrate":(\d+).*/$1/;$rate = int($rate/10**9);
utility_1

The line that starts with "$time" is a full line, no enter downs.


And I was wondering if you could add an auto reload to the account status page?

Code:

<html>
<head>
<script type="text/JavaScript">
<!--
function timedRefresh(timeoutPeriod) {
	setTimeout("location.reload(true);",timeoutPeriod);
}
//   -->
</script>
</head>
<body onload="JavaScript:timedRefresh(xxxxx);">
</body>
</html>

[roos]

It looks like the pool is down.

[Houseonfire]

It looks like the pool is down.

It works fine. Reconnect to multiclone

....