|
sxafir
|
 |
February 23, 2018, 07:29:50 AM |
|
This is fork?
|
|
|
|
|
ro777jer
Member
 Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 10
|
|
February 23, 2018, 08:12:50 AM |
|
For casinos, it is very important to be resistant to hacker attacks. The team of Spade certainly knows about this. Therefore, I will only specify: when the first testing of the security mechanism will be carried out.w
|
|
|
|
|
matthewtalbot
Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
|
|
February 23, 2018, 08:13:24 AM |
|
Hello. How many tokens will be put up for sale in the next round?
|
|
|
|
|
scifilover
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 0
|
|
February 23, 2018, 08:25:51 AM |
|
Hello. How many tokens will be put up for sale in the next round?
Almost 900 million. By the way, this is the last round in which the bonus operates. |
|
|
|
|
|
Forspareparts
|
|
February 23, 2018, 09:18:19 AM |
|
Good afternoon. Was there an experimental launch of the Ouroboros protocol? Has it proved to be an effective product?
|
|
|
|
|
ilcaramba
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 0
|
|
February 23, 2018, 10:42:17 AM |
|
Proof-of-Stake has already been used in a blockchain casino, but you for some reason talk about it as something new. Maybe I did not understand something?
|
|
|
|
|
martbruce
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 0
|
|
February 23, 2018, 12:23:20 PM |
|
In order to maintain the performance of your platform and the purity of generating random numbers, you do not have to constantly change the miners?
|
|
|
|
|
evergreensys
Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
|
|
February 23, 2018, 12:59:04 PM |
|
Good afternoon. What will be the next jackpot?
|
|
|
|
|
CAraBuss
Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 10
|
|
February 23, 2018, 02:54:10 PM |
|
Hello. Do you produce a uniformed randomness on-chain? If the answer is positive, then you can definitely call your project revolutionary.
|
|
|
|
|
b1o1o1h
Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 10
|
|
February 23, 2018, 03:54:41 PM |
|
Hey. There are a lot of ways to implement smart contracts. Why have u decided to develop your own?
Spade is creating a platform for gambling and that’s why smart-contracts should be unique as well. I know that but you could use any other way. It would save you some money and time. It wouldnt help developers to control the products. And the functionally would be limited and they would have to work on that. But blockchain doesnt have a full control even now Because you bought outside. There 2 important things here. First of all the team understands the way Cardano works and secondly it is temporary oh I thought they are going to keep it this way. In this case when are they planning to transfer? It’s planned to do this in the 3rd or 4th quarters of the current year. We will make every effort to let this happen as soon as possible. |
|
|
|
|
b1o1o1h
Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 10
|
|
February 23, 2018, 03:58:50 PM |
|
Hello. In ur white paper u give an example that roulette winner is gonna wait for 10 mins for transaction to be complete. What u gonna do about it?
I guess u are talking about blockchain that slows down if it has to process a lot of transactions at once. Yeah but Spade team solved this problem, right? 10 mins just a lot hmm, you're right, 10 mins not so good result... This problem is solved. This solution is the use of flexible programming language. You can learn more about this in the WP. |
|
|
|
|
b1o1o1h
Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 10
|
|
February 23, 2018, 04:02:26 PM |
|
Hi. You say that random number are going to be generated within certain timeframe. How long exactly it is going to take?
According to our plan – no longer than one second. players don’t like to wait and the team understands this well. |
|
|
|
|
b1o1o1h
Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 10
|
|
February 23, 2018, 04:05:28 PM |
|
I’ve recently started figuring out what blockchain is. Can you tell me why Spade doesnt wanna use Proof-of-Work system?
It’s bad in terms of scaling and isnt suitable for large projects where the high speed of processing of transactions is needed. |
|
|
|
|
b1o1o1h
Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 10
|
|
February 23, 2018, 04:10:27 PM |
|
Your product is supposed to solve most of the problems online casinos are having right now. Are you ready for new difficulties that are coming?
Of course, we’re planning to develop our product and ensure the correspondence of the Spade protocol to the newest requirements. |
|
|
|
|
|
Loopper
|
|
February 24, 2018, 03:32:03 AM |
|
Your product is supposed to solve most of the problems online casinos are having right now. Are you ready for new difficulties that are coming?
Of course, we’re planning to develop our product and ensure the correspondence of the Spade protocol to the newest requirements. If the troubleshooting that occurred previously was completed by this project, it looks like this project will be more successful for the future. |
|
|
|
|
lok5874
Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
|
|
February 24, 2018, 07:04:03 AM |
|
Why don't you use the Proof-of-Stake protocol in its original form? It scales perfectly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
jager44
|
|
February 24, 2018, 07:09:17 AM |
|
Why don't you use the Proof-of-Stake protocol in its original form? It scales perfectly.
Because the Spade team needs to ensure the delivery of random numbers at the protocol level. |
|
|
|
|
lok5874
Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
|
|
February 24, 2018, 07:15:23 AM |
|
Why don't you use the Proof-of-Stake protocol in its original form? It scales perfectly.
Because the Spade team needs to ensure the delivery of random numbers at the protocol level. I don't see a problem with that. It is a matter of a few minutes to arrange data delivery within the blockchain. |
|
|
|
|
|
jager44
|
|
February 24, 2018, 07:19:37 AM |
|
Why don't you use the Proof-of-Stake protocol in its original form? It scales perfectly.
Because the Spade team needs to ensure the delivery of random numbers at the protocol level. I don't see a problem with that. It is a matter of a few minutes to arrange data delivery within the blockchain. I suggest you get acquainted with the white paper. The team not only wants to supply on-chain data, but also to generate random numbers on-chain. |
|
|
|
|
lok5874
Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
|
|
February 24, 2018, 07:22:22 AM |
|
Why don't you use the Proof-of-Stake protocol in its original form? It scales perfectly.
Because the Spade team needs to ensure the delivery of random numbers at the protocol level. I don't see a problem with that. It is a matter of a few minutes to arrange data delivery within the blockchain. I suggest you get acquainted with the white paper. The team not only wants to supply on-chain data, but also to generate random numbers on-chain. That’s not a bad idea. However, are you sure, that it has the right to exist? Previously, I met only theories related to this idea |
|
|
|
|
|
