Petition for TheButterZone

[dillpicklechips]

This is my PM that I should have sent to him but can't:

Just woke up. I deeply apologized for asking about not trading it in an exchange. I am asking to reconsider the red trust you gave me. It would be enough if you change it to neutral.

I just find it weird trading 50000 XRP for a dollar and it was like are you not really using an exchange for this and just trade it for a dollar.

-dillpicklechips

[timerland]

This is my PM that I should have sent to him but can't:

Just woke up. I deeply apologized for asking about not trading it in an exchange. I am asking to reconsider the red trust you gave me. It would be enough if you change it to neutral.

I just find it weird trading 50000 XRP for a dollar and it was like are you not really using an exchange for this and just trade it for a dollar.

-dillpicklechips

This does not seem too good. First off, I think its rather a 'Request' and not a 'Petition' for TheButterZone. TBZ is usually strict with his feedback and probably won't get it removed. Though for sure you have done some good for the community that I hope he takes into consideration. Hopefully you can work something out.

TBZ, how did you loose 1.8BTC on an exchange? Sorry for your loss, though I am curious as to how that happened. There are people trading a lot more BTC and most of them are fine on these exchange platforms. Naturally, P2P is the best and most reliable form of trading.

[UpsilonTrooper]

This is my PM that I should have sent to him but can't:

Just woke up. I deeply apologized for asking about not trading it in an exchange. I am asking to reconsider the red trust you gave me. It would be enough if you change it to neutral.

I just find it weird trading 50000 XRP for a dollar and it was like are you not really using an exchange for this and just trade it for a dollar.

-dillpicklechips

This does not seem too good. First off, I think its rather a 'Request' and not a 'Petition' for TheButterZone. TBZ is usually strict with his feedback and probably won't get it removed. Though for sure you have done some good for the community that I hope he takes into consideration. Hopefully you can work something out.

TBZ, how did you loose 1.8BTC on an exchange? Sorry for your loss, though I am curious as to how that happened. There are people trading a lot more BTC and most of them are fine on these exchange platforms. Naturally, P2P is the best and most reliable form of trading.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1955726.0

BitFloor shutting down or something similar. Read the thread for details

[Fortify]

It seems like a bit of an overreaction on their part and I don't think that was ever the original intention of the trust system. Some people do take auction rules very seriously though and it does take time to set up, so they do not appreciate people who waste time. That said, the feedback is nonsensical and could be much better explained.

[pinkman12345]

How trust system is becoming these days  
----------------------------------------------------------------

When i was a child a dog bite me, the dog's name was Sandy. From that day i took a pledge that whenever i will see a man/women with name Sandy i will kill him/her... Is it justified?

i hope/wish all settles down soon, because we are here not to  fight

[BlackMambaPH]

It seems like a bit of an overreaction on their part and I don't think that was ever the original intention of the trust system. Some people do take auction rules very seriously though and it does take time to set up, so they do not appreciate people who waste time. That said, the feedback is nonsensical and could be much better explained.

Some same cases happened to DT 2 members that they give each other a negative trust for miss understanding but then again it ends up to changing negative trust to neutral or just deleted the negative rating.

[TheButterZone]

It seems like a bit of an overreaction on their part and I don't think that was ever the original intention of the trust system. Some people do take auction rules very seriously though and it does take time to set up, so they do not appreciate people who waste time. That said, the feedback is nonsensical and could be much better explained.

Bolded for emphasis, file under: Nothing is ever good enough?

Just let everybody get away with PTSD-bullying me, breaking contracts all over the place, by saying what amounts to "oops" every... single... time? No.

Everyone owns their fuckery.

That includes me being taken off DT (that I never asked to be on to begin with), for thinking that contractual terms can & should be written & enforced.

The highlighted auction term OP broke was quoted in the feedback.

OP's breaking of the auction term was quoted in the feedback.

OP complained after the auction term specifically said "...you agree to receive & NOT complain..."

The auction term specifying what it would take to have the feedback removed was also quoted in the feedback: "...the exact amount I lost when I did use an exchange - BTC1.84915808..."

The only thing to do after violating the auction term was to ask me for a SegWit or standard address to pay the BTC1.84915808. And since it was the only time anyone had violated that term, I would be willing to transfer that debt & my account documentation (thanks UpsilonTrooper) in case FinCEN ever does prosecute/seize/repay the stolen BTC.

[Ggddtt]

It seems like a bit of an overreaction on their part and I don't think that was ever the original intention of the trust system. Some people do take auction rules very seriously though and it does take time to set up, so they do not appreciate people who waste time. That said, the feedback is nonsensical and could be much better explained.

Bolded for emphasis, file under: Nothing is ever good enough?

Just let everybody get away with PTSD-bullying me, breaking contracts all over the place, by saying what amounts to "oops" every... single... time? No.

Everyone owns their fuckery.

That includes me being taken off DT (that I never asked to be on to begin with), for thinking that contractual terms can & should be written & enforced.

The highlighted auction term OP broke was quoted in the feedback.

OP's breaking of the auction term was quoted in the feedback.

OP complained after the auction term specifically said "...you agree to receive & NOT complain..."

The auction term specifying what it would take to have the feedback removed was also quoted in the feedback: "...the exact amount I lost when I did use an exchange - BTC1.84915808..."

The only thing to do after violating the auction term was to ask me for a SegWit or standard address to pay the BTC1.84915808. And since it was the only time anyone had violated that term, I would be willing to transfer that debt & my account documentation (thanks UpsilonTrooper) in case FinCEN ever does prosecute/seize/repay the stolen BTC.

Fuck you ButterZone.  Fuck you harder than you fuck your anime pillow.

[TheButterZone]

Fuck you ButterZone.  Fuck you harder than you fuck your anime pillow.

Oh look, someone else who thought they could violate my auction terms with impunity!

WTF is an anime pillow? A pillow I can watch anime on?

[pinkman12345]

Fuck you ButterZone.  Fuck you harder than you fuck your anime pillow.

Oh look, someone else who thought they could violate my auction terms with impunity!

WTF is an anime pillow? A pillow I can watch anime on?

I assume amine pillow is a pillow in which one shove their dick fascinating they are drilling a real vagina.
I am not a fan of amine but as per the sentence what above guy said it sounds like what I am thinking.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

amine pillow

Being an organic chemistry buff, I find your ignorant misspelling of this amusing.

My vote is for TBZ to let dillpicklechips off the hook on this one.  Yes, he fucked up your terms of auction, but he doesn't seem to be the typical type of slimeball who would do so--and I fully understand TBZ's intolerance of fools, because this forum is chock full of them.  Giving dillpicklechips a neg for this is a bit too harsh in this case.

[TheButterZone]

amine pillow

Being an organic chemistry buff, I find your ignorant misspelling of this amusing.

My vote is for TBZ to let dillpicklechips off the hook on this one.  Yes, he fucked up your terms of auction, but he doesn't seem to be the typical type of slimeball who would do so--and I fully understand TBZ's intolerance of fools, because this forum is chock full of them.  Giving dillpicklechips a neg for this is a bit too harsh in this case.

I won't allow a mob to create exceptions to swallow my rules, otherwise what is the point of my making the rules?

[Lauda]

amine pillow

Being an organic chemistry buff, I find your ignorant misspelling of this amusing.

My vote is for TBZ to let dillpicklechips off the hook on this one.  Yes, he fucked up your terms of auction, but he doesn't seem to be the typical type of slimeball who would do so--and I fully understand TBZ's intolerance of fools, because this forum is chock full of them.  Giving dillpicklechips a neg for this is a bit too harsh in this case.

I won't allow a mob to create exceptions to swallow my rules, otherwise what is the point of my making the rules?

There's no mob. He just made a suggestion/voiced his opinion.

[TheButterZone]

amine pillow

Being an organic chemistry buff, I find your ignorant misspelling of this amusing.

My vote is for TBZ to let dillpicklechips off the hook on this one.  Yes, he fucked up your terms of auction, but he doesn't seem to be the typical type of slimeball who would do so--and I fully understand TBZ's intolerance of fools, because this forum is chock full of them.  Giving dillpicklechips a neg for this is a bit too harsh in this case.

I won't allow a mob to create exceptions to swallow my rules, otherwise what is the point of my making the rules?

There's no mob. He just made a suggestion/voiced his opinion.

The mob is not just one person.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

amine pillow

Being an organic chemistry buff, I find your ignorant misspelling of this amusing.

My vote is for TBZ to let dillpicklechips off the hook on this one.  Yes, he fucked up your terms of auction, but he doesn't seem to be the typical type of slimeball who would do so--and I fully understand TBZ's intolerance of fools, because this forum is chock full of them.  Giving dillpicklechips a neg for this is a bit too harsh in this case.

I won't allow a mob to create exceptions to swallow my rules, otherwise what is the point of my making the rules?

I get this and totally respect your call--it's your auction, your rules.  I was just lending support to dillpicklechips IF he was going to make an exception.  I was just stating that dillpicklechips wouldn't win the scumbag, illiterate retard-of-the-year award.  My take is that examples need to be made of the worst offenders.  Some people should get a pass.

Got Legendary at 1022!!! Whoooo-hoooo!!!!

[Lauda]

amine pillow

Being an organic chemistry buff, I find your ignorant misspelling of this amusing.

My vote is for TBZ to let dillpicklechips off the hook on this one.  Yes, he fucked up your terms of auction, but he doesn't seem to be the typical type of slimeball who would do so--and I fully understand TBZ's intolerance of fools, because this forum is chock full of them.  Giving dillpicklechips a neg for this is a bit too harsh in this case.

I won't allow a mob to create exceptions to swallow my rules, otherwise what is the point of my making the rules?

There's no mob. He just made a suggestion/voiced his opinion.

The mob is not just one person.

I wouldn't just label any group of people, who share an opinion about something, a mob.

[TheButterZone]

amine pillow

Being an organic chemistry buff, I find your ignorant misspelling of this amusing.

My vote is for TBZ to let dillpicklechips off the hook on this one.  Yes, he fucked up your terms of auction, but he doesn't seem to be the typical type of slimeball who would do so--and I fully understand TBZ's intolerance of fools, because this forum is chock full of them.  Giving dillpicklechips a neg for this is a bit too harsh in this case.

I won't allow a mob to create exceptions to swallow my rules, otherwise what is the point of my making the rules?

There's no mob. He just made a suggestion/voiced his opinion.

The mob is not just one person.

I wouldn't just label any group of people, who share an opinion about something, a mob.

https://www.thefreedictionary.com/mob "See synonyms at crowd"
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/crowd
3. A group of people united by a common characteristic

A group of people sharing an opinion about something=a group of people united by a common characteristic

[MadZ]

You'd probably have better luck contacting philipma1957, as he is the DT-1 member who has TBZ on his trust list. Obviously, this won't get rid of the rating, but it might remove it from DefaultTrust. Best of luck!

[Lauda]

A group of people sharing an opinion about something=a group of people united by a common characteristic

Fine; I give up even though I wouldn't call it a mob.

You'd probably have better luck contacting philipma1957, as he is the DT-1 member who has TBZ on his trust list. Obviously, this won't get rid of the rating, but it might remove it from DefaultTrust. Best of luck!

I don't think this warrants a removal. I do wonder how he/she/it/they would react if philipma insisted on the rating being removed.

[TheButterZone]

philipma1957, I approve of ~TheButterZone being added to your https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust