Bitcoin Forum
November 15, 2019, 08:07:05 AM *
News: Help collect the most notable posts made over the last 10 years.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 »
  Print  
Author Topic: CoinJoin: Bitcoin privacy for the real world  (Read 291287 times)
gmaxwell
Moderator
Legendary
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 2870
Merit: 2606



View Profile
December 12, 2017, 11:18:03 PM
 #681

In order to further incentivize work in this space there is now a multisignature escrow bounty fund:
   3M8XGFBKwkf7miBzpkU3x2DoWwAVrD1mhk
Just a note in case anyone was watching the address: three weeks back the outputs to this address were consolidated in order to take advantage of low fees on the network and to simplify sweeps of further bitcoin spinoffs (as signing for 65 inputs is a bit of a burden); the consolidated funds were moved back to the same address, minus a nominal amount of fee (about 2sat/byte).
1573805225
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1573805225

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1573805225
Reply with quote  #2

1573805225
Report to moderator
1573805225
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1573805225

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1573805225
Reply with quote  #2

1573805225
Report to moderator
The Bitcoin Forum is turning 10 years old! Join the community in sharing and exploring the notable posts made over the years.
1573805225
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1573805225

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1573805225
Reply with quote  #2

1573805225
Report to moderator
Dabs
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1324


The Concierge of Crypto


View Profile WWW
December 13, 2017, 02:46:25 PM
 #682

There's a bunch of new tech out there, some with fantasy names or Harry Potter themes, and some alt wallets that have a built in "obfuscation" button but I don't know if they do CoinJoin or not. As well as Huffle Puffle and other funny sounding ones, also Dark Send, Shared Send, Dark Wallet, Stealth Wallet, Dark Chocolate?

Maybe an altcoin that has masternodes that does CoinJoins of bitcoins ...

None of those qualify for the bounty?

wintercooled
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 4


View Profile
December 18, 2017, 07:15:35 PM
Merited by malevolent (3), Coiner.de (1)
 #683

Hi All,

Adam Ficsor (@nopara73) and Myself are currently trying to test an implementation of a Chaumian CoinJoin mixer and client wallet using the ZeroLink framework and HiddenWallet. https://github.com/nopara73/ZeroLink

We are aiming for 100 participants in the first scale testnet test and any participation would be appreciated. The mix is ongoing and currently we have about half the required anonymity set to conclude our test. To participate you basically have to download binaries (or compile from source), get some testnet coins, move them into a bech32 address in HiddenWallet and join the mix.

Many thanks to those that than can help.

A guide to participating in the test:

https://github.com/nopara73/HiddenWallet/blob/master/HiddenWallet.Documentation/TestingTheZeroLinkMixer.md
RobertNykanen
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 72
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 26, 2018, 02:09:15 PM
 #684

Yes, the facilitator gains no extra information about the transaction than is observable from the outside, if blind signing is used
alex6464
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 188
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 26, 2018, 09:25:34 PM
 #685

Gmaxwell and his bitcoin devs should realise that the IRS has already mapped out all significant bitcoin addresses to social security numbers, whilst they debate the alpha tech of ring sigs but yet are doing nothing to fix the privacy issue
catcoin524
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 29, 2018, 08:04:15 AM
 #686

very informative can someone make test QT soon?    Smiley
catcoin524
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 29, 2018, 11:41:18 AM
 #687

where can I find a comparison of conjoin?
is there a website?
sportbodik
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 29, 2018, 01:12:39 PM
 #688

This seems overly complicated
bytor
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 29, 2018, 10:28:38 PM
 #689

This seems overly complicated

Did you think building a decentralized currency would be simple? One could argue that current privacy is "good enough" to protect identities from most parties, even as blockchain analysis makes address linkage trival, but there is more. Say the DOJ gets tired of fooling around with bitcoin and starts cracking down on funds with dubious addresses in their past. They could even go so far as to put out a list of verified "good" addresses, and make it illegal to accept coins that have been in contact with any others. Now some coins become worthless, or at least worth less than others, and the system breaks down. There is no fungibility without privacy, and no decentralized currency without fungibility.

Although I think the Lightning Network may have some real benefits in this area, since the creation of a channel will not necessarily signify an actual transaction between the two parties, and connecting to a random node cannot incriminate a user. When the channel is closed and funds are transferred, it's basically like a CoinJoin for all parties involved.
nopara73
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 46
Merit: 198


View Profile
October 17, 2018, 04:13:36 PM
Merited by ETFbitcoin (12), dbshck (10), malevolent (5), Coiner.de (5), NLNico (1)
 #690

Hi there,

I am nopara73 and I would like to apply for a part of the CoinJoin bounty.[21]
During the past 3 years I worked tirelessly to improve the privacy of Bitcoin. I wrote over 100 articles on privacy,[22] participated in a privacy workshop[1] and gave privacy presentations on various conferences.[2,3] I designed ZeroLink: Bitcoin Fungibility Framework,[4] within that detailed Chaumian CoinJoin Bitcoin mixing technique[5] and participated in the creation of Pay To EndPoint scheme.[1]
I created the the Tor library for .NET Core,[6,12] I am a maintainer of on NTumbleBit,[7] I participated in the early stages of the creation of Stratis: Breeze wallet,[8] created and deployed the a full block downloading SPV wallet on the mainnet: HiddenWallet.[9] I also lost an impressive amount of weight during the past few months on Ketogenic diet.[10]

The past year I was lucky enough to meet and work together with great people who helped me rewrite and release the latest iteration of HiddenWallet: Wasabi Wallet,[11] which brings me to the CoinJoin bounty.
Wasabi is an open-source, desktop Bitcoin wallet, working on Windows, Linux and OSX, written in .NET Core (C#),[12] which is the cross platform and open source .NET. Wasabi uses NBitcoin[13] as its Bitcoin library, to which Wasabi developers are frequent contributors: @lontivero,[14] @nopara73.[15] Wasabi uses Avalonia[16] library as its UI framework where Wasabi developer @danwalmsley[17] is a maintainer.
Wasabi does not support and does not plan to support other currencies in the future.

Wasabi uses and ships with the Tor anonymity network. In Wasabi we implemented and deployed a BIP157-BIP158-like Golomb-Rice filtering light wallet architecture. To my knowledge Wasabi is the only light wallet that has been deployed on the mainnet and has strong protections in place against network observers, unless we consider Stratis's Breeze wallet[8] a light wallet (it's full block SPV.) (ToDO: what's the state of Neutrino?)
Wasabi have various privacy features, among many, its compulsory coin control feature and a built-in intra-wallet blockchain analysis tool combined with compulsory labeling system to give feedback to the user and guide her to make educated, privacy-aware decisions at spending.
Wasabi's main feature is the built in Chaumian CoinJoin, which has already mixed (created equal outputs) over 110 bitcoins on the mainnet. For real time statistics and last five coinjoin txids, see: http://wasabiukrxmkdgve5kynjztuovbg43uxcbcxn6y2okcrsg7gb6jdmbad.onion/



Wasabi's CJ implementation works as it was described in the first post of this forum thread:
Quote
Using chaum blind signatures: The users connect and provide inputs (and change addresses) and a cryptographically-blinded version of the address they want their private coins to go to; the server signs the tokens and returns them. The users anonymously reconnect, unblind their output addresses, and return them to the server. The server can see that all the outputs were signed by it and so all the outputs had to come from valid participants. Later people reconnect and sign.

For more information, a detailed and up to date description of the inner workings and future plans of Wasabi can be found here:

A Technical Overview of Wasabi Wallet, Future Ideas, Plans and Strategy: https://github.com/zkSNACKs/Meta

The document is not a marketing pitch. In there we honestly detailed the tradeoffs and rationales behind every major design decision we made. I hope it will satisfy all your doubts.

Where does the money go?

A software is not a static, but a living and breathing creature that requires nurturing. Therefore the sustainability of Wasabi is also an important factor, that we did not neglect. There is a (0.003%*anonymity set gained*denomination) per user CoinJoin fee that adds up to 0.3% for a CoinJoin with 100 participants, which is our goal. (Denomination:0.1BTC, only take fee after the denomination, CJ changes doesn't count.) When we reach this number (currently 20) we will let the rounds to happen faster (currently 1/day.) Bootstrapping this system is a balancing act.
The bounty would go to sustain and improve of the wallet and we hope by the time the bounty money runs out project will be able to sustain itself.
Finally, it may also be worth pointing out that I have been accepting donations myself:

Thank you for considering our application!
Cheers, nopara73

References.


Creator of Wasabi Wallet: An open-source, non-custodial, privacy focused Bitcoin wallet - https://wasabiwallet.io
kellogsblocks
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 77
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 17, 2018, 05:10:52 PM
 #691

Hi nopara,

I've interestingly followed your recent talks and blog posts as well as read the future idea plan for Wasabi yesterday and I'm very excited about your work. The last two days I did two CoinJoins with Wasabi in Testnet just out of curiosity.
Today I clicked randomly on the Development subforum and just saw this thread on top with your posting. So it came just in the right time for me.

Your work is amazing, I keep my fingers crossed that you'll succeed. Since I'm not able to contribute to your project on a technical level you would need, expect my donation soon Smiley
RHavar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1474



View Profile
December 25, 2018, 06:28:34 PM
Merited by gmaxwell (5), Carlton Banks (5), suchmoon (4), ETFbitcoin (2)
 #692

As some of you know, I authored: bustapay (bip79) and published a reference implementation of it along with onboarded a major service.


I believe that bustapay itself has the most potential to further the goal of "practical bitcoin privacy", where even the smallest penetration of bustapay payments results in outsized privacy gains for both participants and the bitcoin system at large. Unfortunately bustapay itself suffers from a pretty big "chicken and egg" problem: No one wants to implement support for receiving bustapayments when wallets don't support it. Wallets don't want to support it when no one supports receiving it.


I also believe that the best way to incentivize development is offering by offering concrete rewards for concrete work. So I propose (some of) the coinjoin bounty fund is used to offer compensation to a bunch of wallets for implementing support. Something like offering 2 or 3 bitcoin to each "major" wallet that implements full support.

(And to be clear, I'm not requesting/wanting/needing any of the bounty for myself.)
Narydu
Donator
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 727
Merit: 501



View Profile WWW
January 02, 2019, 10:37:29 PM
 #693

As some of you know, I authored: bustapay (bip79) and published a reference implementation of it along with onboarded a major service.


I believe that bustapay itself has the most potential to further the goal of "practical bitcoin privacy", where even the smallest penetration of bustapay payments results in outsized privacy gains for both participants and the bitcoin system at large. Unfortunately bustapay itself suffers from a pretty big "chicken and egg" problem: No one wants to implement support for receiving bustapayments when wallets don't support it. Wallets don't want to support it when no one supports receiving it.


I also believe that the best way to incentivize development is offering by offering concrete rewards for concrete work. So I propose (some of) the coinjoin bounty fund is used to offer compensation to a bunch of wallets for implementing support. Something like offering 2 or 3 bitcoin to each "major" wallet that implements full support.

(And to be clear, I'm not requesting/wanting/needing any of the bounty for myself.)

I support this demand too. Bustapay is a good effort to help in the privacy aspect and I think that not using the funds is worst than using them to provide willingness to participate.

I think Maxwell Theymos and Pieter still have access to the funds as they moved them for consolidation but it would be great to have some confirmation.

nopara73
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 46
Merit: 198


View Profile
April 03, 2019, 11:36:41 AM
Merited by marcus_of_augustus (50), malevolent (20), suchmoon (19), dbshck (10), TheNewAnon135246 (5), Coiner.de (5), Husna QA (2), ETFbitcoin (1), LeGaulois (1), RapTarX (1)
 #694

Since I did not receive a reply to my previous application[1] for the coinjoin bounty, which I submitted half a year ago, with the exception of Pieter Wuille, who to my knowledge did not succeed to discuss this with the rest of the keyholders, I will consider this as a rejection. So in this post I would like to report a status update and ask you to reconsider the application with the new developments to Wasabi Wallet[2,9] in mind.

- Half a year ago Wasabi created 110 BTC equal coinjoin outputs in total[1], today this number is 22941 BTC.[2]
- Wasabi now does P2P communication over Tor, too.[3]
- Wasabi now broadcasts transactions over Tor to a peer. Previously transaction broadcasting happened to the backend over Tor.[3]
- Wasabi now provides .dmg[4] and .deb[5] packages.
- Wasabi now mixes on the changes, resulting in more efficient mixes.[6]
- Wasabi now partially integrates full nodes: If a full node is running in the background, block fetching happens from it by default instead of connected peers.[5]
- Wasabi now comes with a daemon that can be used for mixing.[7]
- Wasabi have deterministic builds.[8]

Thank you for considering my reapplication!
Cheers, nopara73



References.


Creator of Wasabi Wallet: An open-source, non-custodial, privacy focused Bitcoin wallet - https://wasabiwallet.io
Gyrsur
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1205


I, Quant


View Profile WWW
April 03, 2019, 11:43:21 AM
 #695

Since I did not receive a reply to my previous application[1] for the coinjoin bounty, which I submitted half a year ago, with the exception of Pieter Wuille, who to my knowledge did not succeed to discuss this with the rest of the keyholders, I will consider this as a rejection. So in this post I would like to report a status update and ask you to reconsider the application with the new developments to Wasabi Wallet[2,9] in mind.

- Half a year ago Wasabi created 110 BTC equal coinjoin outputs in total[1], today this number is 22941 BTC.[2]
- Wasabi now does P2P communication over Tor, too.[3]
- Wasabi now broadcasts transactions over Tor to a peer. Previously transaction broadcasting happened to the backend over Tor.[3]
- Wasabi now provides .dmg[4] and .deb[5] packages.
- Wasabi now mixes on the changes, resulting in more efficient mixes.[6]
- Wasabi now partially integrates full nodes: If a full node is running in the background, block fetching happens from it by default instead of connected peers.[5]
- Wasabi now comes with a daemon that can be used for mixing.[7]
- Wasabi have deterministic builds.[8]

Thank you for considering my reapplication!
Cheers, nopara73



References.


I will test Wasabi Wallet for sure. Thank you!

Derivatives like Futures and Options are part of the formation of BTC prices since some time. Whether we like it or not the best way to adapt it is to learn how they are working and how we can profit from them.
TheNewAnon135246
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1809


฿uy ฿itcoin


View Profile
April 03, 2019, 12:06:15 PM
 #696

I've used Wasabi wallet a few times now and I think it's awesome. The fact that it has made nearly 23,000 BTC ($114,300,000) fungible, using CoinJoin, seems like it's definitely entitled to (some of) the bounty.

████████████████████████████
████████▀▀ █▀ █▀ ▀██████████
█████████▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄███████████
██████████▀     ▀  ▀████████
███████▀ ▀  ▄█▀▀▀█▀▀████████
██████▄      █▄  ▀▀  ▀██████
██████         ▄▄█▄ ▄ ▀█████
█████ ▄         ▀▀ ▄ ▀ █████
██████▌          █▀█▀ ▐█████
███████  ▄▌         ▄ ██████
████████▄█         ▄████████
█████████▀     ▄▄ ▄█████████
████████████████████████████
.JACKMATE'S...........
.
MAJESTIC..
████████████████████████
███████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
.
..WIN 1 BITCOIN ON EVERY PREMIER LEAGUE MATCHDAY..
████████████████████████████████
████████████▀█▀ ▀█▀█▀███████████
███████████▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████████████
███████████▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███████████
█████████▀▄ ██▀▄▄▄ ▀ ▄▀█████████
███████▀ ▀█████▄▄▄█▄▄▄██████████
███████▀▄████████▀  ▀█ █▐███████
███████ ▀█████████▄█▀▀██ ███████
████████ ███▀██████ ▄ ██ ███████
████████▌▐▀▄ ██████████ ▄███████
█████████▄██▌▐█████▀██ █████████
████████████▄▀▀▀▀▀▄ ▀▄██████████
████████████████████████████████
.
.JOIN US - IT'S FREE! .
Guy Corem
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1029


Spondoolies, Beam & DAGlabs


View Profile WWW
April 03, 2019, 12:17:34 PM
 #697

Since I did not receive a reply to my previous application[1] for the coinjoin bounty, which I submitted half a year ago, with the exception of Pieter Wuille, who to my knowledge did not succeed to discuss this with the rest of the keyholders, I will consider this as a rejection. So in this post I would like to report a status update and ask you to reconsider the application with the new developments to Wasabi Wallet[2,9] in mind.

- Half a year ago Wasabi created 110 BTC equal coinjoin outputs in total[1], today this number is 22941 BTC.[2]
- Wasabi now does P2P communication over Tor, too.[3]
- Wasabi now broadcasts transactions over Tor to a peer. Previously transaction broadcasting happened to the backend over Tor.[3]
- Wasabi now provides .dmg[4] and .deb[5] packages.
- Wasabi now mixes on the changes, resulting in more efficient mixes.[6]
- Wasabi now partially integrates full nodes: If a full node is running in the background, block fetching happens from it by default instead of connected peers.[5]
- Wasabi now comes with a daemon that can be used for mixing.[7]
- Wasabi have deterministic builds.[8]

Thank you for considering my reapplication!
Cheers, nopara73



References.

nopara73 you have my vote.

New Mimblewimble implementation: https://www.beam.mw
Spondoolies is back with the SPx36: https://www.spondoolies-tech.com/products/spx36
QuantumQrack
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 340
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 03, 2019, 01:44:07 PM
 #698

You have my vote as well.  I wonder why there is a lack of communication?
windpath
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1256
Merit: 1022


View Profile WWW
April 03, 2019, 01:50:06 PM
 #699


Thank you for considering my reapplication!
Cheers, nopara73


Pay the man.
BitUsher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1027


View Profile
April 03, 2019, 02:41:33 PM
 #700

With the addition of TOR integration and Full node use this wallet has come a long way. In some aspects IMHO it has exceeded the expectations of the bounty because the UX is developed leading to better usability for non technical individuals. It would be appreciated if someone would clarify any shortcomings if need be but IMHO nopara deserves the award.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!