Pollution

[inactivechorley5]

Pollution may not harm us directly but its harking nature, disbalancing ecological balance which may end in fatal disaster

[goldenwikiD]

A separate board should be formed by govt to check the rate of pollution occurring in every city. it might help us a lot in tackling pollution

[0k0l0g]

I do think that we need to move towards clean sources of energy for transportation. No doubt about it. Emissions from the transport sector count a great deal towards air pollution levels. Of course there are also other factors: industry, agriculture, etc. And there is still the problem that electric cars are simply not affordable for most people. But an alternative? More public transport, car-free cities, bike schemes, etc.

[haremaboriginal7]

Every work has side effects. Industrialisation isn't possible without pollution but we can check the level of it surely

[Josiah Dave Leonor]

Pollution is the presence in or introduction into the environment of a substance or thing that has harmful or poisonous effects . Like air pollution,

[squog]

Yes, i believe that our insistent reliance on fossil fuel is very much stupid. I mean we should phase it out decades ago and move on to something more self sustaining. I know for a fact that some middle eastern shiek actually blocks the progress in self sustaining energy simply because if we don't use fossil fuel, they just go back to being poor nobody's in a desert. They just want to get and sell their fuel until there's no more then move on to something else.

[Anonaneadone]

By the news that our oil reserves are now decreasing, and we are still finding for the another resources for oil reserves. The territorial disputes between the Asian countries near the Scarborough Shoal, I think the reason why are they fighting for their right for that territory is because the experts found out that that place has a abundant oil reserve that can support for a country having a shortage in the means of oil reserve. I think the best way to preserve and to lessen the pollution because of black fumes cause by smoke belcher vehicles is to use electronic vehicles that don’t need a fuel oil to use instead they will use a battery that contains energy from electricity to use that vehicle and I think, with a massive use of this kind of vehicle, we helped to lessen the pollution, we helped saving the rest of life of our planet.

[Btcjunpitz18]

Pollution is a threat to survival. Can we just have a moment to pondered on the fact, that we are the destroyer of our own native land? We are now facing the problem which brought by human. In returned we suffer and facing the consequences that created by us. We are the ones to be blamed, our own wrong doing so we must stop pollution and let's start within ourself.

[berkcelik16]

The most important role is up to governments.

[Elsie123]

pollution mostly occur because fumes and a fire.
Whether you agree with vehicles made fuel oil in a change with tekhnologi electricity to reduce the pollution?

Pollution nowadays really becoming severe due to continious emission of monocarbon from vehicles. This issue cant be easily fixed because of the needs of people by means of transportation.

[Bhalibad]

One of the main reasons for the excessive pollution of the exhaust gases of our megacities is the extremely low quality of automotive fuel. The solution is very simple but expensive. Use of environmentally friendly fuels (natural gas, liquid hydrogen, ethyl alcohol and other varieties of "green gasoline").

Pollution is a coastal areas were made a dumping site of water  smoke coming from facfories from vehicles and burning plastic and oil spills.

[Sithara007]

pollution mostly occur because fumes and a fire.
Whether you agree with vehicles made fuel oil in a change with tekhnologi electricity to reduce the pollution?

Pollution nowadays really becoming severe due to continious emission of monocarbon from vehicles. This issue cant be easily fixed because of the needs of people by means of transportation.

The main culprits behind air pollution are thermal power-plants and industrial units. Vehicles also contribute in a significant way, but their proportion has been going down for the past many years.

[BADecker]

Don't we have enough air pollution already?

Scientists Now Argue Merits Of Spraying Aerosols Into Atmosphere To Cool Is OK

As the world grapples with different strategies to mitigate the warming climate, few have sparked such controversy in recent times as solar geoengineering.

The proposed plan would use aerosols, fired into the stratosphere with high-flying aircraft, to cool the planet by blocking radiation from the sun.

It would essentially mimic the effects seen after volcanic eruptions – but, an analysis published at the beginning of this year warned that the approach could have grave consequences.

If the plan to artificially cool Earth were abruptly stopped, the experts warned it could trigger extreme warming at rates far more dramatic than the current climate is changing, in a phenomenon known as the 'termination shock.'

But now, some scientists have hit back, arguing that the risk might not be as it seems.

Read more at https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2018/03/13/scientists-now-argue-merits-of-spraying-aerosols-into-atmosphere-to-cool-is-ok/.

[fahad.khan]

pollution mostly occur because fumes and a fire.
Whether you agree with vehicles made fuel oil in a change with tekhnologi electricity to reduce the pollution?

Pollution is becoming a major problem, but instead of bragging here and there, look up an think what YOU CAN DO to control/reduce it. Just Do your part.
For Example, Spread awareness, Use electricity and Not engines (if you can afford), Control your garbage production, try to reduce your other fume discharges and many other methods.
If everyone thinks like this, it will have a major impact.

[mmfiore]

Dont we have enough air pollution already?

Scientists Now Argue Merits Of Spraying Aerosols Into Atmosphere To Cool Is OK

As the world grapples with different strategies to mitigate the warming climate, few have sparked such controversy in recent times as solar geoengineering.

The proposed plan would use aerosols, fired into the stratosphere with high-flying aircraft, to cool the planet by blocking radiation from the sun.

It would essentially mimic the effects seen after volcanic eruptions – but, an analysis published at the beginning of this year warned that the approach could have grave consequences.

If the plan to artificially cool Earth were abruptly stopped, the experts warned it could trigger extreme warming at rates far more dramatic than the current climate is changing, in a phenomenon known as the 'termination shock.'

But now, some scientists have hit back, arguing that the risk might not be as it seems.

Read more at https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2018/03/13/scientists-now-argue-merits-of-spraying-aerosols-into-atmosphere-to-cool-is-ok/.

Yeah well that's the kind of argument you can hear from big oil producers :p.

Even them now are agreeing their product is f*** up the planet, only a maniac dumb dumb could deny it (yeay mr President of the USA)

So what's their solution : reduction of oil use ? no no no ...

Yeay lets go bioengineer our planet, we'll save humanity ... please  .

[BADecker]

Dont we have enough air pollution already?

Scientists Now Argue Merits Of Spraying Aerosols Into Atmosphere To Cool Is OK

As the world grapples with different strategies to mitigate the warming climate, few have sparked such controversy in recent times as solar geoengineering.

The proposed plan would use aerosols, fired into the stratosphere with high-flying aircraft, to cool the planet by blocking radiation from the sun.

It would essentially mimic the effects seen after volcanic eruptions – but, an analysis published at the beginning of this year warned that the approach could have grave consequences.

If the plan to artificially cool Earth were abruptly stopped, the experts warned it could trigger extreme warming at rates far more dramatic than the current climate is changing, in a phenomenon known as the 'termination shock.'

But now, some scientists have hit back, arguing that the risk might not be as it seems.

Read more at https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2018/03/13/scientists-now-argue-merits-of-spraying-aerosols-into-atmosphere-to-cool-is-ok/.

Yeah well that's the kind of argument you can hear from big oil producers :p.

Even them now are agreeing their product is f*** up the planet, only a maniac dumb dumb could deny it (yeay mr President of the USA)

So what's their solution : reduction of oil use ? no no no ...

Yeay lets go bioengineer our planet, we'll save humanity ... please  .

From the Population thread:

One of the best ways is to spread nano-size aluminum and barium and strontium particles in the air, so that people breath them, penetrating into their reproductive organs, which will cause their children to become infertile.

[Btcalimie]

Pollution is the destroyer of our earth it cause of climate change that we are suffering.

Indeed you are right but the root of pollution is the over population and the continues improvement of technology which causes pollution.

[BADecker]

Pollution is the destroyer of our earth it cause of climate change that we are suffering.

Indeed you are right but the root of pollution is the over population and the continues improvement of technology which causes pollution.

A long time before pollution came about, people died. They hacked each other to bits with swords when necessary.

What good is it to keep the earth alive if we don't have people to live in it? So, the real problem is people and their thinking. How are we going to eliminate wrong thinking from people? And since there is so much difference of opinion, how are we even going to determine what thinking is wrong?

[Sithara007]

Indeed you are right but the root of pollution is the over population and the continues improvement of technology which causes pollution.

First part of your post is right, but the second part is pure BS. No one is going to deny the fact that the root cause of pollution is over-population. But you are wrong when you say that improvement of technology further causes the worsening of the situation. IMO, it is just the opposite. Technology helps us to reduce the negative effects of pollution.

[Flayme]

That is one of the most common problems of one country especially those country who is developed country..  The main reason why it happen because there are a lots of people who has no dicipline about themselves.. They are just thinking about their own goods only not knowing that what they are doing could affect a lots especially our environment...  So we need to act now to save our mother earth...