Lauda/aTriz possible alts of each other [Merit Abuse]

[Deena]

Lauda deserves a lot more than 50 merits imo, I'm not bothered to go through every post and merit them, so I just picked one.

That is not even the point. The point is that others are tagged red for the above but not Lauda and you!

[TMAN]

Lauda deserves a lot more than 50 merits imo, I'm not bothered to go through every post and merit them, so I just picked one.

That is not even the point. The point is that others are tagged red for the above but not Lauda and you!

Because these guys have integrity, something that cannot be said about you.. neither of these guys would sell merit so this thread is a non starter. People who know aTriz and Lauda will stand up for them as they are above such actions, I am sure the same would happen for me if you made a similar thread actually the same for anyone who is posting in Lauda or aTriz's defence.

Look up the meaning of integrity, then look at your own actions..

Peace out

[Deena]

Because these guys have integrity, something that cannot be said about you.. neither of these guys would sell merit so this thread is a non starter. People who know aTriz and Lauda will stand up for them as they are above such actions, I am sure the same would happen for me if you made a similar thread actually the same for anyone who is posting in Lauda or aTriz's defence.

Look up the meaning of integrity, then look at your own actions..

Peace out

I suggest you do the same and then start acting as it is defined. Tagging members against proof with red trust or tagging members for actions that the tagger is performing himself is not integrity but hypocricy and scam.

[Quickseller]

Because these guys have integrity, something that cannot be said about you.. neither of these guys would sell merit so this thread is a non starter. People who know aTriz and Lauda will stand up for them as they are above such actions, I am sure the same would happen for me if you made a similar thread actually the same for anyone who is posting in Lauda or aTriz's defence.

Look up the meaning of integrity, then look at your own actions..

Peace out

I suggest you do the same and then start acting as it is defined. Tagging members against proof with red trust or tagging members for actions that the tagger is performing himself is not integrity but hypocricy and scam.

Unfortunatly lauda does not have any intregrity.

[Lauda]

Unfortunatly lauda does not have any intregrity.

Escrow scammers definitely do, and are in a position to judge other people's integrity.

[Pan0pticon]

If you are an Escrow scammer, you have zero integrity, this also applies to known extortionists, BTCtalk negative rating abusers, and merit abusers.

You do not get a special pass privilege, through time served, or previous titles.

Definition of scam;

: a fraudulent or deceptive act or operation.

Enough said.

[ngavanngo22]

I don't think they're alts. It'll be a big problem if aTriZ gives big amount of Merit for a lower rank account then all you guys can confirm that they are alts but with Lauda, a legendary member, I don't think Lauda need these amount of Merit to increase account rank. Beside I think with all the things Lauda did in this forum, he deserves it