Forum Violating the U.S. Law

[proudhon]

MeSerah is probably not referring to the tattoo pictures.

The tattoo picture is from the thread that is mentioned (Worlds first tattoo)

I know.  There were other pictures posted in the thread that weren't of the tattoo person, and I think it's at least one of those pictures that MeSerah is concerned about.

[1714775833]

1714775833

[1714775833]

1714775833

[1714775833]

1714775833

[1714775833]

1714775833

[Atom]

The OP's "Recent Posts" are worth taking a jog through if you want some perspective....

This seems to be the only post they made in the tatoo thread...

I dont think thats a real tatoo. I dont see any swelling or scabbing and it looks different in the two ink'd images. If it is real, we have a Darwin Award winner!! Stupid is as stupid does.

the horror

[Serge]

where is the tubgirl when you need one

[Serge]

OP please go after all big major free porn tube sites for posting hardcore porn videos on the internet and not validating age of their visitors

you may start your search in google with keyword "porn"

thanks, much appreciated!

[ex0420]

Stop being jelly. It makes you look like a small child. She's hot and 200 BTC richer, good for her. No need to get all bitchy about it.


Also PORN ON MY INTERNET? NO. FUCKING. WAY...

[Atom]

OP please go after all big major free porn tube sites for posting hardcore porn videos on the internet and not validating age of their visitors

you may start your search in google with keyword "porn"

thanks, much appreciated!

Holy shit!  Watch out anyone who may follow this advice, I learned the hard way that you'll find porn doing this!

[proudhon]

Well, whether MeSerah was trolling or not, it looks like a post containing several nude pictures was removed from the thread.  One of those pictures, as I recall, appeared to be of young looking girl.  My guess is that's what MeSerah was referring to.  Again, whether trolling or not, her complaint was apparently taken seriously.

[MeSarah]

Im glad y'all took time to read the laws.

(1) Prohibited conduct
Whoever knowingly and with knowledge of the character of the
material, in interstate or foreign commerce by means of the World
Wide Web, makes any communication for commercial purposes that is
available to any minor and that includes any material that is
harmful to minors shall be fined not more than $50,000,
imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both.

(3) Civil penalty
In addition to the penalties under paragraphs (1) and (2),
whoever violates paragraph (1) shall be subject to a civil
penalty of not more than $50,000 for each violation. For purposes
of this paragraph, each day of violation shall constitute a
separate violation.

(B) Engaged in the business
The term "engaged in the business" means that the person who
makes a communication, or offers to make a communication, by
means of the World Wide Web, that includes any material that is
harmful to minors, devotes time, attention, or labor to such
activities, as a regular course of such person's trade or
business, with the objective of earning a profit as a result of
such activities (although it is not necessary that the person
make a profit or that the making or offering to make such
communications be the person's sole or principal business or
source of income). A person may be considered to be engaged in
the business of making, by means of the World Wide Web,
communications for commercial purposes that include material
that is harmful to minors, only if the person knowingly causes
the material that is harmful to minors to be posted on the
World Wide Web or knowingly solicits such material to be posted
on the World Wide Web.

(6) Material that is harmful to minors
The term "material that is harmful to minors" means any
communication, picture, image, graphic image file, article,
recording, writing, or other matter of any kind that is obscene
or that -
(A) the average person, applying contemporary community
standards, would find, taking the material as a whole and with
respect to minors, is designed to appeal to, or is designed to
pander to, the prurient interest;
(B) depicts, describes, or represents, in a manner patently
offensive with respect to minors, an actual or simulated sexual
act or sexual contact, an actual or simulated normal or
perverted sexual act, or a lewd exhibition of the genitals or
post-pubescent female breast

[error]

Im glad y'all took time to read the laws.

(1) Prohibited conduct
Whoever knowingly and with knowledge of the character of the
material, in interstate or foreign commerce by means of the World
Wide Web, makes any communication for commercial purposes that is
available to any minor and that includes any material that is
harmful to minors shall be fined not more than $50,000,
imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both.

(3) Civil penalty
In addition to the penalties under paragraphs (1) and (2),
whoever violates paragraph (1) shall be subject to a civil
penalty of not more than $50,000 for each violation. For purposes
of this paragraph, each day of violation shall constitute a
separate violation.

(B) Engaged in the business
The term "engaged in the business" means that the person who
makes a communication, or offers to make a communication, by
means of the World Wide Web, that includes any material that is
harmful to minors, devotes time, attention, or labor to such
activities, as a regular course of such person's trade or
business, with the objective of earning a profit as a result of
such activities (although it is not necessary that the person
make a profit or that the making or offering to make such
communications be the person's sole or principal business or
source of income). A person may be considered to be engaged in
the business of making, by means of the World Wide Web,
communications for commercial purposes that include material
that is harmful to minors, only if the person knowingly causes
the material that is harmful to minors to be posted on the
World Wide Web or knowingly solicits such material to be posted
on the World Wide Web.

(6) Material that is harmful to minors
The term "material that is harmful to minors" means any
communication, picture, image, graphic image file, article,
recording, writing, or other matter of any kind that is obscene
or that -
(A) the average person, applying contemporary community
standards, would find, taking the material as a whole and with
respect to minors, is designed to appeal to, or is designed to
pander to, the prurient interest;
(B) depicts, describes, or represents, in a manner patently
offensive with respect to minors, an actual or simulated sexual
act or sexual contact, an actual or simulated normal or
perverted sexual act, or a lewd exhibition of the genitals or
post-pubescent female breast

None of this is relevant to the Bitcoin forum since the forum does not sell porn.

Again, why are you threatening to have us shot?

[TiagoTiago]

If any kid gets harmed for seeing a pic on the Internet, the parents should be arrested for neglecting to properly care for the life they choose to create.

[Serge]

minors should not be allowed on this board!  (sorry Atlas)

[Atom]

Im glad y'all took time to read the laws.

(1) Prohibited conduct
Whoever knowingly and with knowledge of the character of the
material, in interstate or foreign commerce by means of the World
Wide Web, makes any communication for commercial purposes that is
available to any minor and that includes any material that is
harmful to minors shall be fined not more than $50,000,
imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both.

(3) Civil penalty
In addition to the penalties under paragraphs (1) and (2),
whoever violates paragraph (1) shall be subject to a civil
penalty of not more than $50,000 for each violation. For purposes
of this paragraph, each day of violation shall constitute a
separate violation.

(B) Engaged in the business
The term "engaged in the business" means that the person who
makes a communication, or offers to make a communication, by
means of the World Wide Web, that includes any material that is
harmful to minors, devotes time, attention, or labor to such
activities, as a regular course of such person's trade or
business, with the objective of earning a profit as a result of
such activities (although it is not necessary that the person
make a profit or that the making or offering to make such
communications be the person's sole or principal business or
source of income). A person may be considered to be engaged in
the business of making, by means of the World Wide Web,
communications for commercial purposes that include material
that is harmful to minors, only if the person knowingly causes
the material that is harmful to minors to be posted on the
World Wide Web or knowingly solicits such material to be posted
on the World Wide Web.

(6) Material that is harmful to minors
The term "material that is harmful to minors" means any
communication, picture, image, graphic image file, article,
recording, writing, or other matter of any kind that is obscene
or that -
(A) the average person, applying contemporary community
standards, would find, taking the material as a whole and with
respect to minors, is designed to appeal to, or is designed to
pander to, the prurient interest;
(B) depicts, describes, or represents, in a manner patently
offensive with respect to minors, an actual or simulated sexual
act or sexual contact, an actual or simulated normal or
perverted sexual act, or a lewd exhibition of the genitals or
post-pubescent female breast

Can you explain to me how you rationalize your complaint with the fact that Bitcoin.org forums don't sell anything, and nobody is conducting business or attempting to gain profit by the "communications" you have a problem with?   Seems like you skipped the whole "this doesn't even apply to you guys" part of the monetary/judicial threat.

[Serge]

ATT internet police: please do something about this site http://www.pornhub.com/  and their network of other sites linked from top horizontal menu.

[LeFBI]

MeSarah: nice copy&paste. did you read it?

The images in the thread are still not porn. Since when is a women in a bikini or a covered nipple "actual or simulated sexual act or sexual contact, an actual or simulated normal or perverted sexual act, or a lewd exhibition of the genitals" ?

Janet Jackson exposed her nipple piercing live on television,millions of people did see it.....all damaged for live. Oh look, a nipple...we all gonna die! Any Britney Spears or Christina Aguilera video on youtube is more perverted than any picture in the tattoo thread.

Keep trollin'

[BitcoinPorn]

 

[Serge]

MeSarah, please kindly search in google images "TubGirl", make sure you have no miners around your computer monitor at that time of querying the search. what you about to see cannot be unseen.
That image violates world peace!

[GeniuSxBoY]

I worry for MeSarah. If she can't handle pixels on a screen, how does she handle reflections in the bathroom?!

[theymos]

Regardless of any laws, potentially-NSFW images should never be embedded on the forum.

[Atom]

Regardless of any laws, potentially-NSFW images should never be embedded on the forum.

Even if the thread is literally about people with Bitcoin tattoos?

[theymos]

Even if the thread is literally about people with Bitcoin tattoos?

Yes. No embedded NSFW images, even with a disclaimer. NSFW links are OK if they have a disclaimer.