LAUDA ATTEMPTING TO BLACKMAIL AGAIN!

[802529er]

At this point the forum is openly promoting and endorsing this activity

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1761133.20

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1759991.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1759607.msg17570759#msg17570759

This user and several of his friends have continually shown disregard for the forum rules and guidelines, only to be given the power to leave negitive trust on whom they wish.

And the most recent blackmail attempt.

https://archive.fo/szqRf


Mprep or any other admins going to moderate their god damn website?

[1714988602]

1714988602

[1714988602]

1714988602

[TMAN]

That's the same link as before. Lauda hasn't used slack in a year move on peeps. Nothing to see

[TheNewAnon135246]

That's the same link as before. Lauda hasn't used slack in a year move on peeps. Nothing to see

Can you provide evidence of that?

If not by your own twisted logic you are guilty of the crime then.

That’s what you’ve been doing with Lauda, going around claiming other are scammers or trolls, and requiring they prove otherwise.

Surprise surprise it’s diffrent for you isn’t it?

The archive link you posted says "21 Jan 2017 06:31:56 UTC".

[TheNewAnon135246]

Your topic title says he is trying to blackmail again. You quote posts from a topic where the issue was already addressed. Not sure what you are trying to accomplish here?

[TMAN]

That's the same link as before. Lauda hasn't used slack in a year move on peeps. Nothing to see

Can you provide evidence of that?

If not by your own twisted logic you are guilty of the crime then.

That’s what you’ve been doing with Lauda, going around claiming other are scammers or trolls, and requiring they prove otherwise.

Surprise surprise it’s diffrent for you isn’t it?

I don't need to it's a fact. You need to provide evidence to the contrary and you haven't.

Just proving yourself to be another butt hurt scammer