|
JohnDoe3490
|
 |
February 02, 2018, 02:21:07 PM |
|
Sorry, new to mining in general, but AKA seems very interesting...
Can someone explain to me how an address can already have over 137000 AKAs if mining just started few days ago?
Even with dozens of GH/s this seems very awkward...
Coin was "leaked". An alpha build of what you need to start the chain was published on Akromas public GitHub. Someone used that to start mining on the chain. So that person got all the rewards initially. Looks like that person got all the rewards from the first 3000 blocks = 27000 AKA. Then someone else (or same person/team, just different wallet) joined in the fun. Then for some weird reason the team figured they should just go with that instead of resetting the chain. And now it's def too late to reset the chain because so many miners have spent a lot of money on it. My guess is that it was an intentional leak. There were just too many amateur mistakes when the rest of the stuff has been very professional. Also I gave yet to see a good explanation as to why they didn't want to reset the chain. The standard reply is just: It's too late to reset the chain now... I just hope they did it to create a tight community and that it's not the team themselves that mined to dump. Can we have an "official" statement regarding this? true/false Thank you Mining started around the 25th of January lol. It has been mining for over a week. |
|
|
|
|
RandomAnon
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
February 02, 2018, 05:00:18 PM |
|
Sorry, new to mining in general, but AKA seems very interesting...
Can someone explain to me how an address can already have over 137000 AKAs if mining just started few days ago?
Even with dozens of GH/s this seems very awkward...
Coin was "leaked". An alpha build of what you need to start the chain was published on Akromas public GitHub. Someone used that to start mining on the chain. So that person got all the rewards initially. Looks like that person got all the rewards from the first 3000 blocks = 27000 AKA. Then someone else (or same person/team, just different wallet) joined in the fun. Then for some weird reason the team figured they should just go with that instead of resetting the chain. And now it's def too late to reset the chain because so many miners have spent a lot of money on it. My guess is that it was an intentional leak. There were just too many amateur mistakes when the rest of the stuff has been very professional. Also I gave yet to see a good explanation as to why they didn't want to reset the chain. The standard reply is just: It's too late to reset the chain now... I just hope they did it to create a tight community and that it's not the team themselves that mined to dump. It was initially only avaliable to solo mining via CPU..(Assumption since their was literally no hashpower on this). Around the 23rd a pool called miningpeon went live. Gpu mining was up and running. Nobody with any real power was mining it. I would know as i was literally the first person with any decent hashrate to go on it. I only put 5 rigs on this and i was controlling 65% of the total hashrate. Then couple hours later another miner nicehash'd it and collected 20k and stopped. As the hours progress more miners started to come in, but was relevant their was a total of 30-40 miners. About 2 days go by and it was on Minerpool.net and that's when the nethash exploded too over 2 TH/s.. By the time it was posted here the nethash has dropped to around 600GH/s. So technically nobody really missed out on anything. |
|
|
|
|
|
ntrader
|
|
February 02, 2018, 05:00:44 PM
Last edit: February 02, 2018, 07:06:47 PM by ntrader |
|
Mining started around the 25th of January lol. It has been mining for over a week.
You wrong, its started 19.01 |
|
|
|
|
badstars
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 0
|
|
February 02, 2018, 06:56:45 PM |
|
Coin was "leaked". An alpha build of what you need to start the chain was published on Akromas public GitHub. Someone used that to start mining on the chain.
So that person got all the rewards initially. Looks like that person got all the rewards from the first 3000 blocks = 27000 AKA. Then someone else (or same person/team, just different wallet) joined in the fun.
Then for some weird reason the team figured they should just go with that instead of resetting the chain. And now it's def too late to reset the chain because so many miners have spent a lot of money on it.
My guess is that it was an intentional leak. There were just too many amateur mistakes when the rest of the stuff has been very professional. Also I gave yet to see a good explanation as to why they didn't want to reset the chain.
The standard reply is just: It's too late to reset the chain now...
I just hope they did it to create a tight community and that it's not the team themselves that mined to dump.
It was initially only avaliable to solo mining via CPU..(Assumption since their was literally no hashpower on this). Around the 23rd a pool called miningpeon went live. Gpu mining was up and running. Nobody with any real power was mining it. I would know as i was literally the first person with any decent hashrate to go on it. I only put 5 rigs on this and i was controlling 65% of the total hashrate. Then couple hours later another miner nicehash'd it and collected 20k and stopped. As the hours progress more miners started to come in, but was relevant their was a total of 30-40 miners. About 2 days go by and it was on Minerpool.net and that's when the nethash exploded too over 2 TH/s.. By the time it was posted here the nethash has dropped to around 600GH/s. So technically nobody really missed out on anything. Doesn't really matter if it was CPU or GPU mined and what power they had. Difficulty adjusts, block time is targeted to 10s and diff started at ~0 if I'm not mistaken. If you're the only miner starting on a chain you get the same reward no matter your hash rate --> all blocks. The first miner mined more than 1000 blocks an hour for the first few hours from what I can see, which gives a block time lower than 3.6 seconds initially. It later adjusted as diff rose. How can you claim "So technically nobody really missed out on anything." when: - Chain was almost halfway to planned hard fork to reduce block rewards for miners when it was announced on Medium?
- Chain was almost 2/3 to planned hard fork to reduce block rewards for miners when it was announced here.
Yes, that hard fork has since been postponed but argument is still as valid. I'm looking forward to see you explain this 😎 |
|
|
|
|
badstars
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 0
|
|
February 02, 2018, 06:59:01 PM |
|
Mining started around the 25th of January lol. It has been mining for over a week.
No, first block was Jan 19th around 5:39 PM: https://explorer.akroma.io/block/1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bumbr
|
|
February 02, 2018, 08:41:03 PM |
|
I'm looking forward to see you explain this 😎
There is no other explanation, except that he premined a large percent of this coin supply and wants to dump his bags at high price, that's why you can see posts like this Tired of shit-coins? Tired of pajeet anonymous developers? Tired of Copy-paste projects? Tired of Presale Masternodes? Tired of Premine? Look no further... Real team... Real developers... Real project. Real vision and future!!! Get in before the moon mission boys!  |
|
|
|
|
Digital Drug Lord
Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 12
|
|
February 02, 2018, 10:35:06 PM |
|
Coin was "leaked". An alpha build of what you need to start the chain was published on Akromas public GitHub. Someone used that to start mining on the chain.
So that person got all the rewards initially. Looks like that person got all the rewards from the first 3000 blocks = 27000 AKA. Then someone else (or same person/team, just different wallet) joined in the fun.
Then for some weird reason the team figured they should just go with that instead of resetting the chain. And now it's def too late to reset the chain because so many miners have spent a lot of money on it.
My guess is that it was an intentional leak. There were just too many amateur mistakes when the rest of the stuff has been very professional. Also I gave yet to see a good explanation as to why they didn't want to reset the chain.
The standard reply is just: It's too late to reset the chain now...
I just hope they did it to create a tight community and that it's not the team themselves that mined to dump.
It was initially only avaliable to solo mining via CPU..(Assumption since their was literally no hashpower on this). Around the 23rd a pool called miningpeon went live. Gpu mining was up and running. Nobody with any real power was mining it. I would know as i was literally the first person with any decent hashrate to go on it. I only put 5 rigs on this and i was controlling 65% of the total hashrate. Then couple hours later another miner nicehash'd it and collected 20k and stopped. As the hours progress more miners started to come in, but was relevant their was a total of 30-40 miners. About 2 days go by and it was on Minerpool.net and that's when the nethash exploded too over 2 TH/s.. By the time it was posted here the nethash has dropped to around 600GH/s. So technically nobody really missed out on anything. Doesn't really matter if it was CPU or GPU mined and what power they had. Difficulty adjusts, block time is targeted to 10s and diff started at ~0 if I'm not mistaken. If you're the only miner starting on a chain you get the same reward no matter your hash rate --> all blocks. The first miner mined more than 1000 blocks an hour for the first few hours from what I can see, which gives a block time lower than 3.6 seconds initially. It later adjusted as diff rose. How can you claim "So technically nobody really missed out on anything." when: - Chain was almost halfway to planned hard fork to reduce block rewards for miners when it was announced on Medium?
- Chain was almost 2/3 to planned hard fork to reduce block rewards for miners when it was announced here.
Yes, that hard fork has since been postponed but argument is still as valid. I'm looking forward to see you explain this 😎 I thought this coin was cool but like you said it's already mining like it's been out for 1 year. Who ever mined it early made out who ever is mining now is wasting hash power |
|
|
|
|
|
|
nibbly
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
February 03, 2018, 12:49:30 AM |
|
Coin was "leaked". An alpha build of what you need to start the chain was published on Akromas public GitHub. Someone used that to start mining on the chain.
So that person got all the rewards initially. Looks like that person got all the rewards from the first 3000 blocks = 27000 AKA. Then someone else (or same person/team, just different wallet) joined in the fun.
Then for some weird reason the team figured they should just go with that instead of resetting the chain. And now it's def too late to reset the chain because so many miners have spent a lot of money on it.
My guess is that it was an intentional leak. There were just too many amateur mistakes when the rest of the stuff has been very professional. Also I gave yet to see a good explanation as to why they didn't want to reset the chain.
The standard reply is just: It's too late to reset the chain now...
I just hope they did it to create a tight community and that it's not the team themselves that mined to dump.
It was initially only avaliable to solo mining via CPU..(Assumption since their was literally no hashpower on this). Around the 23rd a pool called miningpeon went live. Gpu mining was up and running. Nobody with any real power was mining it. I would know as i was literally the first person with any decent hashrate to go on it. I only put 5 rigs on this and i was controlling 65% of the total hashrate. Then couple hours later another miner nicehash'd it and collected 20k and stopped. As the hours progress more miners started to come in, but was relevant their was a total of 30-40 miners. About 2 days go by and it was on Minerpool.net and that's when the nethash exploded too over 2 TH/s.. By the time it was posted here the nethash has dropped to around 600GH/s. So technically nobody really missed out on anything. Doesn't really matter if it was CPU or GPU mined and what power they had. Difficulty adjusts, block time is targeted to 10s and diff started at ~0 if I'm not mistaken. If you're the only miner starting on a chain you get the same reward no matter your hash rate --> all blocks. The first miner mined more than 1000 blocks an hour for the first few hours from what I can see, which gives a block time lower than 3.6 seconds initially. It later adjusted as diff rose. How can you claim "So technically nobody really missed out on anything." when: - Chain was almost halfway to planned hard fork to reduce block rewards for miners when it was announced on Medium?
- Chain was almost 2/3 to planned hard fork to reduce block rewards for miners when it was announced here.
Yes, that hard fork has since been postponed but argument is still as valid. I'm looking forward to see you explain this 😎 I thought this coin was cool but like you said it's already mining like it's been out for 1 year. Who ever mined it early made out who ever is mining now is wasting hash power Don't see what you're whining about. Not even 1% of the total coin supply has been mined. It's still very early days. |
|
|
|
|
HTHP
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 86
Merit: 0
|
|
February 03, 2018, 01:00:01 AM |
|
Is there a way to get this currency and setup a master or is it too early ??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimid
|
|
February 03, 2018, 12:00:50 PM |
|
Is there a way to get this currency and setup a master or is it too early ??
It's too early "Masternode Platform (in development, est Q1)" |
|
|
|
|
solotraderbct
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
February 03, 2018, 12:13:30 PM |
|
This coin seems to be the first coin which has masternode feature correspond with smart contract. It's nice to see how it develop in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
serialminer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
February 03, 2018, 01:03:49 PM |
|
This coin seems to be the first coin which has masternode feature correspond with smart contract. It's nice to see how it develop in the future.
Pirl already has masternode and smart contracts integration since november. But pirl has unlimited supply and no block reward halving... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
onopko9320
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 216
Merit: 100
Miner on nvidia
|
|
February 03, 2018, 02:19:54 PM |
|
This coin seems to be the first coin which has masternode feature correspond with smart contract. It's nice to see how it develop in the future.
Pirl already has masternode and smart contracts integration since november. But pirl has unlimited supply and no block reward halving... On first page there is nowhere a total number of coins. Only what kind of reward is written. |
MYEtherWallet 0x7B79ed3d67c3f8224Dc8498d811e50fba6481191
|
|
|
|
trgnn
|
|
February 03, 2018, 02:52:21 PM |
|
This coin seems to be the first coin which has masternode feature correspond with smart contract. It's nice to see how it develop in the future.
Yes  Useful masternodes are a very very refreshing thing. |
|
|
|
Ahrcoin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 71
Merit: 0
|
|
February 03, 2018, 09:20:07 PM |
|
I am ready for the masternodes. Has anyone said when this is expected to be on the exchanges? Until you can buy it check out the Mining.Akroma.org. We are the only 0.0% fee pool. Miners should keep what they earn. Also I am thinking about doing a tx fee lottery system. I have not decided on the exact details. Would anyone be interested in that? |
|
|
|
|
|
JohnDoe3490
|
|
February 03, 2018, 11:34:00 PM |
|
Dang, only 4 miners but 700 MH. A few decent miners but I don't know if I should use this pool even if it is 0%.
|
|
|
|
|
Ahrcoin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 71
Merit: 0
|
|
February 04, 2018, 01:04:04 AM |
|
Dang, only 4 miners but 700 MH. A few decent miners but I don't know if I should use this pool even if it is 0%.
Do you have any recommendations? I am trying to get the word out there. One pool having over 50% of the network hashrate is not good. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
