Retracted [re:lauda]

[Quickseller]

I have been told by someone very reputable, and whom I trust that Lauda has a serious pill addiction.

From what I understand, Lauda is very frequently talking about various drugs in chat rooms.

People close to Lauda have apparently been saying that lauda has a serious pill addiction, which is something I would tend to believe.

I have been told by at least one reputable person that the intent behind Lauda's shady behavior (such as extortion) is to fund his pill addiction, and drug use.

Should an alleged pill addiction be a cause for concern? Would this affect his judgment? Should this person be trusted? Does this create any conflicts?

I assume my source does not want to be named out of fear of retribution from Lauda.

Update: After >24 hours from when Lauda first responded to this thread, Lauda has yet to in any way deny, nor disputed he has an addiction to pills, nor has he denied that he abuses illegal drugs.

As an update to this thread:

The information I received was from someone who I trusted at the time, but I have seen to bend and stretch the truth. A review of my other private conversations with this person reflects even more egregious examples of this, including examples of while I cannot affirmatively say is a lie, some representations are what I would consider to be dishonest. I am not going to comment on my source, as I previously told this person I would keep his identity secret, although some may guess based on semi recent forum events.

When I opened this thread, I took what this person said at face value and did not ask to see any underlying evidence. The claimed evidence was already shaky. For this I was wrong and I apologize.

[1714798776]

1714798776

[1714798776]

1714798776

[1714798776]

1714798776

[1714798776]

1714798776

[Lauda]

From what I understand, Lauda is very frequently talking about various drugs in chat rooms.

I have not been actively participating in any public chat rooms for quite some time, therefore this statement is naturally going to be false.

I have been told by someone very reputable, and whom I trust that Lauda has a serious pill addiction.
...
I assume my source does not want to be named out of fear of retribution from Lauda.

Two questions:
a) What kind of pills? Just curious.
b) Chat logs? Since you claim that this is being done in multiple chat rooms, then it should be trivial to provide logs without revealing the source. This is undeniable. Any attempt at rejecting to provide logs is going to result in an automatic disapproval of the claim.
If the accusation turned out to be completely false (i.e. intentionally malicious), would you reveal the source? Just curious.

Would this affect his judgment?

My alleged, pill-affected judgement is apparently still better than the judgement of you and your source combined. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Should an alleged pill addiction be a cause for concern? Would this affect his judgment? Should this person be trusted? Does this create any conflicts?

On an internet forum?  Who gives a shit?  Let's be real:  Lauda is not engaged in brain surgery here, and the people hesheitweyouthey has tagged are indeed engaged in scumbaggery.  So no, even if Lauda turned out to be like Brandon Vedas (Ripper is a gangsta!), I don't think it's much cause for concern.

As an aside, this is the world of bitcoin we're in, and I have no doubt there are a lot of members--trusted or otherwise--who are into illicit substances.  As long as illegal stuff isn't being promoted here, I think people should feel free to do what they want.

[Welsh]

Every single one of Lauda's trust ratings are public, and hes spot on with his ratings most of the time. I doubt they'll be any evidence provided by your source and once the source can't show any evidence to back up the claims should probably come under investigation themselves after trying to slander someones name with malicious intent.

Anyway, drug use/addiction is a personal issue and depending on the severity and other circumstances should be helped rather than ridiculed. 

[Lauda]

As an aside, this is the world of bitcoin we're in, and I have no doubt there are a lot of members--trusted or otherwise--who are into illicit substances.  As long as illegal stuff isn't being promoted here, I think people should feel free to do what they want.

When it comes to things that affect a lot of people [account trading, farming (even scamming; which isn't a bannable offense),  et. al.] we should be libertarian according to some, but when it comes to things that nobody is affected by other than the person consuming them, then we shouldn't be. Classic average Joe switching-when-it-fits-him-behavior. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ [1]

Every single one of Lauda's trust ratings are public, and hes spot on with his ratings most of the time. I doubt they'll be any evidence provided by your source and once the source can't show any evidence to back up the claims should probably come under investigation after trying to slander someones name with malicious intent.

It's not like OP has a habit of doing this. Oh wait..
[1] I forgot about this guy.

[Quickseller]

I am interested for Lauda to more specifically address this. Are you going to explicitly deny? Or is there truth to you having a drug addiction?

If the accusation turned out to be completely false (i.e. intentionally malicious), would you reveal the source? Just curious.

If in my sole judgment I was fed intentionally inaccurate information, I may consider revealing my source. This would only apply if the information is materially inaccurate.

As an aside, this is the world of bitcoin we're in, and I have no doubt there are a lot of members--trusted or otherwise--who are into illicit substances.  As long as illegal stuff isn't being promoted here, I think people should feel free to do what they want.

I am not talking about casual/recreational use, I am talking about an addiction. There is a major difference between the two.

[klaaas]

Curious what kind of drugs you where high on when posting this.

Pills are out, rocket fuel is the new thing!


Nah, this story sounds made up QS.

Did this person whom you trust send you a PM for help and paid in advance ?

[The Sceptical Chymist]

There is a major difference between the two.

Yeah dude, I'm well aware of this--and IMO it still doesn't matter if Lauda is a pill enthusiast or a full-blown pill head addict.  Lauda's ratings are still on the mark.  In addition, you still haven't provided anything other than innuendo that Lauda is anywhere on the pill-taking spectrum.  

You could provide proof, but I don't think it matters anyway.  I think it's irrelevant and that this is just another butthurt smear campaign, which you are famous for.

Does being addicted to cats count as being an addict

LOL, I got that same problem myself.

[Lauda]

I am interested for Lauda to more specifically address this. Are you going to explicitly deny? Or is there truth to you having a drug addiction?

I am not going to explicitly make any statement until I see at least some reasonable *logs* that need addressing. It is easy to create a contradictory trap and try to find me mentioning (not usage, just the word/discussion) the name of some medicine or illegal drug X time ago. e.g. mentioning/discussing Adderall after watching Mr. Robot.

If the accusation turned out to be completely false (i.e. intentionally malicious), would you reveal the source? Just curious.

If in my sole judgment I was fed intentionally inaccurate information, I may consider revealing my source. This would only apply if the information is materially inaccurate.

That isn't sufficient. Why would you protect someone intentionally giving slanderous information?

You could provide proof, but I don't think it matters anyway.  

It's impossible to know whether something like that has been going on since day one or since a random day during my presence here. Assuming I did this and if it were possible to tell, you'd already know that my judgement was compromised and needn't no "source".
Does being addicted to cats count as being an addict

[Vod]

I have been told by someone very reputable, and whom I trust that Lauda has a serious pill addiction.

Hearsay.  I've been told many times by one of the most reputable people on this forum that you are a pedophile.  

(Edit - this little lie by Quickseller has now made him the all time least trusted active member of this forum.)

[Quickseller]

I have been told by someone very reputable, and whom I trust that Lauda has a serious pill addiction.

Hearsay.

Surely this should be very easy for Lauda to dispel this by simply denying that he has a pill addiction. However he has failed to do this. Why do you think Lauda would not quickly deny that he is addicted to pills?

Instead, Lauda is wanting to know how much evidence there is against him, and wanting to see the evidence that he has an addiction. All while Lauda's "friend" The Pharmacist is backing him, and preemptively saying that Lauda should be in "DT". What do you think this is an indication of?

[Vod]

Surely this should be very easy for QS to dispel he is a pedophile by simply denying that he is one. However he has failed to do this.

Why do you think QS would not quickly deny that he is a pedophile?

Instead, QS is ignoring the question, trying to know how much evidence there is against him, and wanting to see the evidence that he is a pervert.  :/

[Quickseller]

Surely this should be very easy for QS to dispel he is a pedophile by simply denying that he is one. However he has failed to do this.

I can unequivocally say this is not an accurate description of me. It was ignored in the past because (as you know), there is no basis for making that statement.

No one has claimed to have any evidence to backup that statement, nor have I asked for any evidence to backup this statement. The same cannot be said about Lauda:

You could provide proof,

I am not going to explicitly make any statement until I see at least some reasonable *logs* that need addressing.

Two questions:
a) What kind of pills? Just curious.
b) Chat logs?

[Vod]

It was ignored in the past

Just for the record - this is the fourth time you have been accused of being a pedophile, and each time you ignored it instead of providing any evidence you are not.  :/

Same thing you are now accusing Lauda of doing...

You can ignore away.  There is no point in my pushing anything seeing as you have already destroyed your credibility.  

[Lauda]

Surely this should be very easy for Lauda to dispel this by simply denying that he has a pill addiction. However he has failed to do this. Why do you think Lauda would not quickly deny that he is addicted to pills?

Your vendetta just makes you blind and biased. A very characteristic thing of me, which I do via actual communication channels (and not via some fake "sources"), is stating "I can neither confirm nor deny this" (or something similar) to pretty much everything (e.g. do you like XYZ).

Instead, Lauda is wanting to know how much evidence there is against him, and wanting to see the evidence that he has an addiction.

There is no evidence; which is why I'm calling you out for it.

All while Lauda's "friend" The Pharmacist is backing him, and preemptively saying that Lauda should be in "DT". What do you think this is an indication of?

The Pharmacist, I didn't know we were friends. Good to know I guess

No one has claimed to have any evidence to backup that statement, nor have I asked for any evidence to backup this statement.

Let me get this straight; some random baboon told you "Lauda does pills", and you were like "Wow, let me go make a thread!". Seems reasonable. /s

Same thing you are now accusing Lauda of doing...

Hearsay is apparently a very good basis when going after me.

[aTriz]

lol.

[TMAN]

I read that as porn addiction, clicked the thread and was really disappointed.

I wonder how many members are actually addicted to porn, cocaine, weed or wanking? maybe we should ask your "source" QS. That would be about as relevant to anything as this thread

[TheUltraElite]

I have been told by someone very reputable, and whom I trust that Lauda has a serious pill addiction.

You have done some nice "escrows" between "different" people and thus have some ground to stand on.  I hope you find solace in this type of trolling. (not)

From what I understand, Lauda is very frequently talking about various drugs in chat rooms.

Is talking about food also not allowed? Drugs are everywhere and even talking about water intake is classified as abuse if you do it too much. Lets not got into the pharmacological definition of "drug".

People close to Lauda have apparently been saying that lauda has a serious pill addiction, which is something I would tend to believe.

Because you are a butthurt lowlife who cant leave this forum and would continue to hit on every situation that seems to go against people? #feelsbadman

I have been told by at least one reputable person that the intent behind Lauda's shady behavior (such as extortion) is to fund his pill addiction, and drug use.

Should an alleged pill addiction be a cause for concern? Would this affect his judgment? Should this person be trusted? Does this create any conflicts?

I assume my source does not want to be named out of fear of retribution from Lauda.

If Lauda has a problem I am sure that pertains to their personal life and not something to be discussed here. Rest of your writeup is BS.
Leave Lauda alone willya - I know you wont but still I try.

[Wendigo]

I have been told by someone very reputable, and whom I trust that Lauda has a serious pill addiction.

Hearsay.

Surely this should be very easy for Lauda to dispel this by simply denying that he has a pill addiction. However he has failed to do this. Why do you think Lauda would not quickly deny that he is addicted to pills?

Instead, Lauda is wanting to know how much evidence there is against him, and wanting to see the evidence that he has an addiction. All while Lauda's "friend" The Pharmacist is backing him, and preemptively saying that Lauda should be in "DT". What do you think this is an indication of?

Do you have any information about what kind of pills he is taking? Over the counter or prescription? If they are prescription drugs he might have been illegally obtaining them via the dark net or paying off pharmacists. Are you sure he is actually trying to obtain more drugs beyond his prescription if he has any? Opiates are hard to shake off anyways.

[Lauda]

Do you have any information about what kind of pills he is taking? Over the counter or prescription? If they are prescription drugs he might have been illegally obtaining them via the dark net or paying off pharmacists. Are you sure he is actually trying to obtain more drugs beyond his prescription if he has any? Opiates are hard to shake off anyways.

I'd like to know what pills I'm taking as well.