[List] Suspected users that are abusing merit 3.0

[andrebai]

4 Accounts Connected:

Turbo-S, Nata01, cryptanys , Tata011

Unfortunately, I can't add the pictures, only links.
Image here https://i.imgur.com/fE5HBvE.jpg
MERIT SUMMARY :https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1160692

Merit summary for Turbo-S

Merit: 101
Sent in the last 120 days

    September 18, 2018, 05:51:17 PM: 1 to Nata01 for Re: CTOИT ЛИ ПOКУПATЬ APPLE
    September 18, 2018, 05:50:02 PM: 2 to cryptanys for Re: Cyeвepный ты чeлoвeк?
    September 18, 2018, 05:48:11 PM: 1 to Tata011 for Re: Чтo дeлaть, ecли нa paбoтe cкyчнo?

Look at the time, all merit was given within 2 minutes. All for newbies(2 of them has only 3 posts in local offtopic section).


PROOF:
 Profile page Nata01  http://archive.li/ABlyw
 Profile page cryptanys  http://archive.li/XQCR8
 Profile page Tata011   http://archive.li/rEBkg
 Message Tata011   http://archive.li/a0cHB
 Message cryptanys  http://archive.li/h8AvJ
 Message Nata01  http://archive.li/vosAo

MISCELLANEOUS:

Right after the announcement of a new restriction for Jr member by theymos here , Turbo-S send merit to his new alt account. Merit is given for shit post in Local offtopic thread. I think all this account connected.

[FFrankie]

I wonder how much merit abuse is going on now?

[RivAngE]

USER PROFILE : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=176810 & https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1208438
MERIT SUMMARY : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1208438
PROOF : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2375142.msg24228465#msg24228465
MISCELLANEOUS : Seems like this account (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=176810) created this account (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1208438) because the 1st one got a lot of negative trust. He/she then spent all the free sMerit to the new account.

I initially made this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5037439.0 and a member introduced me to this thread, so I repost it here.

[Piggy]

these are some other three high profile account which are probably abusing merits, these were previosly de ranked from to newbie now theybare on their way to be full member in a matter of days:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=909195


Received by 909195

• 2018-09-18T15:40:33Z: 8 from Rahip for Neden hiç Türk Youtuber yok?
• 2018-09-18T15:38:20Z: 21 from 895125 for favori nargile karışımınız
• 2018-09-18T15:35:34Z: 17 from 904645 for Google 2FA Authenticator Hakkında
• 2018-09-18T15:34:45Z: 4 from 909459 for Film önerisi
• 2018-09-18T15:15:21Z: 50 from 909166 for Ubuntu 16.10 Release edildi.

Total Merits 100

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=909166

Sent by 909166

• 2018-09-18T15:15:21Z: 50 to 909195 for Ubuntu 16.10 Release edildi.

Total Merits 50

Received by 909166

• 2018-09-18T15:11:18Z: 50 from 807879 for Wireless Hız Problemi
• 2018-09-18T01:16:12Z: 50 from alpsea for Wireless Hız Problemi

Total Merits 100


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=907810

Received by 907810

• 2018-09-18T16:04:13Z: 50 from easyboy for PSU - Güç Kaynağı Hakkında Önemli Bilgiler
• 2018-09-18T15:53:04Z: 50 from 905883 for Doğrusu

Total Merits 100

[cryptovigi]

I put below some examples of really high merit rewards for shitty posts...

50 merits for such a quality post!

The Bear market going to end soon and the bull market going to start sooner because we are receiving good news from all over the wold bull market is going to rock in crypto market as soon as possible, keep holding the top coins and tokens.

100 merits for 2 posts:
50 for this

   yanlış                   doğru
Yumuklu Sucurta       Sucuklu Yumurta

and another 50 for this

Çin malından uzak durulmalı. Japon malları kalitelidir kafa ağrıtmaz. Evga Coolermaster Corsair FSP güvenerek alabilirsiniz.

translation:

Chinese goods should be avoided. Japanese goods are of good quality. Evga Coolermaster Corsair can rely on FSP.

100 merits - 2x50 for this one:

11de kalıyosa hızınız 16mb dır. Azını verir fazlasını vermez

translation:

Stay at 11, your speed is 16mb. Gives less, no more

8 merit for bounty report....

Week 4 ( 11/09 - 17/09)
Facebook  Campaign
Your number in Spreadsheet:772
Link to your BitcoinTalk profile:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1260556
Link to your Telegram profile:https://t.me/nathantan
Link to your profile on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/aisyah.arini.98871
REPOST:
https://www.facebook.com/aisyah.arini.98871/posts/277202609559665
https://www.facebook.com/aisyah.arini.98871/posts/277202749559651
........

6 merit for bounty report:

WEEK: # 2 ( 07/04-14/04 )
Btt User      :   arwini89
Twiter Link   :   https://twitter.com/ChrisBrwnn_
Twitter Audit   :   https://www.twitteraudit.com/ChrisBrwnn_

   Retweet Link 1  https://twitter.com/KoniosOfficial/status/981677152394498049
   Retweet Link 2  https://twitter.com/KoniosOfficial/status/981870780266041344
......

6 merit for

No, they're just doing their job. I don't think they KNOW that something will turn scam.

1 merit

The main idea of this project is reducing violence in prisons

[SFR10]

Self-admitted:

USER PROFILE : Ranyar sending merits to FishVoice
MERIT SUMMARY : Here (credits to BPIP [Vod])
PROOF: Archived link

~Snipped~
In addition, Ranyar gave me some merits to help me reach the rank of a member because I'm his girlfriend. This can also be easily checked, isn't it?
~Snipped~

• 1 merit from this post
• 8 merits from this post

MISCELLANEOUS: Got 9 merits from her "boyfriend".

[conanmori]

USER PROFILE : Username EastSound

PROOF: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4442368.msg39687040#msg39687040
MISCELLANEOUS: sent 13 merits to one post and not deserving post.

[GGurol]

Main ACC: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1266645
Second ACC : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1615443

Proofs :
self dialogs on bct. Replies theirselves.
1 merit sent from one to other to get jr. member. (just in time!)
same local time, same last online dates.
all messages on same topics since 2nd account has been created.
same airdrop & bounty participations.
same spelling errors and usages.

[xtraelv]

USER PROFILE : Reinsurer
MERIT SUMMARY : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1171363
PROOF:


USER PROFILE : Crypto Insurance
MERIT SUMMARY : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=2491573
PROOF:


MISCELLANEOUS:

Interesting thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5074430.msg48321386#msg48321386
https://archive.fo/eoPM8

Looks like merit is getting distributed for the shill sockpuppet accounts. All shilling the same products. No genuine accounts. (Check their post history)

[MikeyVeez]

I am sorry, but I would like to ask you if sending merits to alts is a reason to get a ban? And if no, why you didn´t start with that? 

[RivAngE]

I am sorry, but I would like to ask you if sending merits to alts is a reason to get a ban? And if no, why you didn´t start with that? 

I haven't seen any rule stating that this is a reason to receive a ban, but about negative feedback... I don't know... I suppose it's up to the DefaultTrust users to decide that.

[DdmrDdmr]

<…>

It may not fall strictly under the motives that can lead to a ban, but meriting and Alt is the same as trying to merit yourself (which the forum software does not allow one to do).
Aside from it being a clear case of split personality, it will not be perceived as other than merit abuse, and may lead to getting a fresh spread of red paint on your profile.

[Pmalek]

I am sorry, but I would like to ask you if sending merits to alts is a reason to get a ban? And if no, why you didn´t start with that? 

That would be clear merit abuse and potentially account farming. In theory, if you have 100 smerits you could create 10 brand new accounts, write some posts and merit your own accounts with 10 merits each. And now you have cheated your way to the Member rank (when you acquire the needed Activity points). I don't mean you personally, it is just an example.

[AverageGlabella]

I am sorry, but I would like to ask you if sending merits to alts is a reason to get a ban? And if no, why you didn´t start with that? 

I haven't seen any rule stating that this is a reason to receive a ban, but about negative feedback... I don't know... I suppose it's up to the DefaultTrust users to decide that.

As far as I know selling merits is only against the rules if you're a merit source but this doesn't mean that its not ethically right to do it anyway. You will definitely be found out sooner than later if you are abusing merits and sending to your alternate accounts.

[chenille]

As far as I know selling merits is only against the rules if you're a merit source but this doesn't mean that its not ethically right to do it anyway. You will definitely be found out sooner than later if you are abusing merits and sending to your alternate accounts.

I can't imagine that selling Merit isn't against the rules. If someone tries to sell his Merits he will be red tagged by DT and I don't see a reason to exempt Merit sellers which are no Merit source from being tagged.

Just imagine if everyone have had sold his airdropped sMerits after the Merit system was introduced, the whole meaning of the Merit system would be undermined, that Merit has to be earned and not bought.

[FFrankie]

With the new yobit campaign we should be on the lookout for this more.

[Pmalek]

With the new yobit campaign we should be on the lookout for this more.

Not necessarily, there doesn't seem to be a merit requirement in the rules for this campaign. So there is no incentive or reason for members to abuse the merit system as they would get accepted either way.   

[tbct_mt2]

With the new yobit campaign we should be on the lookout for this more.

There is no manager, no spreadsheet, no merit requirements, no address to trace, so how do you look at it.
The only way (possible) is to look at fake conversation, when they create a post, then another one join and make fake discussion, but it is not strong enough, especially as proof.

[FFrankie]

With the new yobit campaign we should be on the lookout for this more.

There is no manager, no spreadsheet, no merit requirements, no address to trace, so how do you look at it.
The only way (possible) is to look at fake conversation, when they create a post, then another one join and make fake discussion, but it is not strong enough, especially as proof.

You need to be a senior member which is why I think there will be merit abuse.

[TopTort777]

I don't know where it will be correct to post, but I don't think that this post deserves a merit...

The only explanation to this is, that it was made by a coincidence.