|
criz2fer
|
 |
February 08, 2018, 07:39:02 AM |
|
You got it wrong mate, you just want to earn merit for your self. Bounty campaigns are separate from the merit system. This competition you suggesting is opposing the rules of the admin on how merit should be use and you aren't making any sense on offering your own service for this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
tatnM (OP)
Member
 Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
|
|
February 08, 2018, 07:51:40 AM |
|
You got it wrong mate, you just want to earn merit for your self. Bounty campaigns are separate from the merit system. This competition you suggesting is opposing the rules of the admin on how merit should be use and you aren't making any sense on offering your own service for this.
I already changed a lot in the starting conditions, read the branch please |
|
|
|
|
|
Taki
|
|
February 08, 2018, 07:58:31 AM |
|
I would strongly recommend people to stay away from this "Merit competition" for now. Merit is supposed to be the reward people will get from mutual forum members for providing good contributions to the forum and not supposed to be used a commodity for giveaways and competitions. OP is making this look like a sellout to be honest. Garbage shitposters coming at with shitideas nowadays.  Of course you are one of those lucky members who have nothing to worry about. But I see that merit competition has place to be from the most beginning. There are a lot of users who appeared in the situation when they have enough activity to move on a higher rank, but they need a lot of merits to finish that raise. I can understand them and this situation has nothing with shitposting, that's why people compare so much. |
|
|
|
|
Jet Cash
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2456
https://JetCash.com
|
|
February 08, 2018, 09:54:45 AM |
|
@tatnM
I added you to my Bitcoin beggars gallery, and I've put you on ignore.
Merits and sMerits are intended to be awarded for quality posts, not to enable people to take part in bounty campaigns.
|
Offgrid campers allow you to enjoy life and preserve your health and wealth. Save old Cars - my project to save old cars from scrapage schemes, and to reduce the sale of new cars. My new Bitcoin transfer address is - bc1q9gtz8e40en6glgxwk4eujuau2fk5wxrprs6fys |
|
|
actisstupidname
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 5
|
|
February 08, 2018, 10:22:40 AM |
|
@tatnM
I added you to my Bitcoin beggars gallery, and I've put you on ignore.
Merits and sMerits are intended to be awarded for quality posts, not to enable people to take part in bounty campaigns.
Yeah, like this quality post. Your idea is not only stupid, it's fucking retarded.
Such eloquence... Moar merits for this guy! LMAO, what a shit forum, much shit. |
|
|
|
|
tatnM (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
|
|
February 08, 2018, 10:46:14 AM |
|
@tatnM
I added you to my Bitcoin beggars gallery, and I've put you on ignore.
Merits and sMerits are intended to be awarded for quality posts, not to enable people to take part in bounty campaigns.
you read carefully what I suggested, posts will be on the forum, users will share their opinions and for this will receive a reward! Just by voting it will be right! And will not be distributed merits to your accounts! I do not need anything for this! |
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
February 08, 2018, 10:51:42 AM |
|
If you send people merit for promoting or solely for posting about (or suggesting) certain ICOs or *campaigns*, it is very likely that both you and the participating users will be neg. rated. This is not the way that the system was meant to be used. Your idea is not only stupid, it's fucking retarded.
A post worth meriting. |
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion) |
|
|
tatnM (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
|
|
February 08, 2018, 10:56:52 AM |
|
If you send people merit for promoting or solely for posting about (or suggesting) certain ICOs or *campaigns*, it is very likely that both you and the participating users will be neg. rated. This is not the way that the system was meant to be used. Your idea is not only stupid, it's fucking retarded.
A post worth meriting. Thank you for your opinion! I think the discussion on this topic is over! |
|
|
|
|
|
