[PrimeDice] (Staff Only) Earn Bitcoins Simply By Posting

[Don007]

I think that the competition between ritz and stunnas is great and slowly ritz is earning good trust. But I don't think rates can honestly get any higher lol. 50 cents a post is good money for posting on a forjm

I agree, the current prices aren't bad . Unfortunately I'm 2 Activity Points short of being a Sr Member ^^. However, I'm fine with the current rates. I really like this service Stunna is offering us, and that's why this is my seventh month (I guess) that I'm using this service loyaly.

[1715456858]

1715456858

[deisik]

I have just changed my signature; there's no need to PM me anymore Stunna .

I think it looks great!

Looks nice but I would rather change black text with the dark blue one...

[MoneyGod]

I have just changed my signature; there's no need to PM me anymore Stunna .

I think it looks great!

Its good but which style using counter its more better

[sanjoea]

Starting posts:  588                                 
Bitcoin address:  16p6vYJ5JyosZF8c4JLJXXkxnTAxNjmj5d

[mighty jol]

changed my signature accordingly to the op.

[brush242]

It would be cool if Stunna also gave trust feedback in return, but we really are not risking anything.  He is paying us to do something we would be doing anyway - i.e. posting on the forum.

Uh huh. And if he didn't pay one month, what would you say? Because rest assured the response here would not be positive.

"Hey, you're not risking anything, you're doing something you would do anyway?'

Let me know how that works out for you.

Hey, if you don't want to do the signature deal, don't do it  I'm sure you can ask for feedback from others.
Feedback should be earned, not just "forced" trust.  If Stunna wants to leave feedback, great.  If Stunna doesn't want to leave feedback, it's not the end of the world.  If you don't like taking this "risk" you are talking about, don't take it.

You missed the point entirely.

"Hey, if you don't want to do the signature deal, don't do it," really? It's ~not~ the end of the world? Groundbreaking.

Whether you happen to understand it or not, this is an agreement between two individuals, each risking something of relative worth to themselves. You risk your time and effort, Stunna risks his credibility, the reputation of PrimeDice, and his ability to pay. Those things have value to each, but the other has something that is of more value to each, as is demonstrated by their willingness to trade. Nothing is forced.

While you may find that such risk is negligible, that is only true for you.

[DubFX]

I didn't get the PM yet but i chaged sig already

[WhiteShum]

I was bored so I created this. Feel free to use/edit it however you like. You might think that it needs some more work or a better moto.

PRIMEDICE Find the gold pot at the end of the rain฿ow ⦅̶͊̄̏͂͝_̵̈́͐⦆@PrimeDice
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  

OMG,MY EYES
http://nooooooooooooooo.com/
 

[brush242]

Hey, if you don't want to do the signature deal, don't do it  I'm sure you can ask for feedback from others.
Feedback should be earned, not just "forced" trust.  If Stunna wants to leave feedback, great.  If Stunna doesn't want to leave feedback, it's not the end of the world.  If you don't like taking this "risk" you are talking about, don't take it.

As we know, Stunna is on the trusted list and therefore his trust can significantly contribute to making or breaking a board member's reputation here at Bitcointalk. He can't go dishing them out willynilly, only for reserved cases whether it be positive or negative trust.

Who said anything about dishing trust out willy-nilly?

In fact, if Stunna left negative feedback for the people that spam the boards with posts for the sake of the .sig, that would add more credibility to his program.

Before you ask: no, that wouldn't be "willynilly" either.

[brush242]

It would be cool if Stunna also gave trust feedback in return, but we really are not risking anything.  He is paying us to do something we would be doing anyway - i.e. posting on the forum.

Uh huh. And if he didn't pay one month, what would you say? Because rest assured the response here would not be positive.

"Hey, you're not risking anything, you're doing something you would do anyway?'

Let me know how that works out for you.

I would say he didn't do what he said he would, what else is there to say?

So far it's worked out great.

You're of the position that you saying "hey, he was only paying you for what you would do anyway," and "hey, he didn't pay," would assuage all of the other people that were irritated by the whole thing?

They'd just go, "hey, he's right, I've changed my mind about getting skrewed, let's never talk of this again,"?

[hilariousandco]

Hey, if you don't want to do the signature deal, don't do it  I'm sure you can ask for feedback from others.
Feedback should be earned, not just "forced" trust.  If Stunna wants to leave feedback, great.  If Stunna doesn't want to leave feedback, it's not the end of the world.  If you don't like taking this "risk" you are talking about, don't take it.

As we know, Stunna is on the trusted list and therefore his trust can significantly contribute to making or breaking a board member's reputation here at Bitcointalk. He can't go dishing them out willynilly, only for reserved cases whether it be positive or negative trust.

Who said anything about dishing trust out willy-nilly?

The people who are wanting Stunna to leave feedback for everyone on the deal.

In fact, if Stunna left negative feedback for the people that spam the boards with posts for the sake of the .sig, that would add more credibility to his program.

It might have a negative effect too. If users get caught spamming or cheating he might leave negative, but he usually kicks them off the deal at least.

[ahmedjadoon]

Ritz and you both claim to be the "Highest Signature Campaign" but he is a little better in rates if you check out.

[MegaHustlr]

Yes ritz does pay out more but on the other hand stunna has been here longer, I prefer better rates..

[brush242]

Who said anything about dishing trust out willy-nilly?

The people who are wanting Stunna to leave feedback for everyone on the deal.

In fact, if Stunna left negative feedback for the people that spam the boards with posts for the sake of the .sig, that would add more credibility to his program.

It might have a negative effect too. If users get caught spamming or cheating he might leave negative, but he usually kicks them off the deal at least.

Well, giving trust for a deal completed honestly isn't willy-nilly, anymore than negative feedback for spammers would be willy-nilly.

Though I don't know what the negatives would be? Also, can anyone tell if he kicks someone off of the deal? Is that public?

[hilariousandco]

Who said anything about dishing trust out willy-nilly?

The people who are wanting Stunna to leave feedback for everyone on the deal.

In fact, if Stunna left negative feedback for the people that spam the boards with posts for the sake of the .sig, that would add more credibility to his program.

It might have a negative effect too. If users get caught spamming or cheating he might leave negative, but he usually kicks them off the deal at least.

Well, giving trust for a deal completed honestly isn't willy-nilly, anymore than negative feedback for spammers would be willy-nilly.

Though I don't know what the negatives would be? Also, can anyone tell if he kicks someone off of the deal? Is that public?

Sometimes he posts about kicking people off after they've been caught out for whatever reason, but I suspect the majority of others are just quietly removed.

I think the leaving feedback discussion is a moot point anyway. Stunna is free to leave or not leave any feedback he wants and so is everyone else. As it stands he does not seem to give out feedback to people for just participating in this deal, and I personally wouldn't expect him to.

[brush242]

Sometimes he posts about kicking people off after they've been caught out for whatever reason, but I suspect the majority of others are just quietly removed.

I think the leaving feedback discussion is a moot point anyway. Stunna is free to leave or not leave any feedback he wants and so is everyone else. As it stands he does not seem to give out feedback to people for just participating in this deal, and I personally wouldn't expect him to.

Well, of course. I agree with that.

I don't necessarily expect him to either, but the impression I was getting was that somehow it would wrong or bad for him to do so.

That's simply isn't true.

[hilariousandco]

Sometimes he posts about kicking people off after they've been caught out for whatever reason, but I suspect the majority of others are just quietly removed.

I think the leaving feedback discussion is a moot point anyway. Stunna is free to leave or not leave any feedback he wants and so is everyone else. As it stands he does not seem to give out feedback to people for just participating in this deal, and I personally wouldn't expect him to.

Well, of course. I agree with that.

I don't necessarily expect him to either, but the impression I was getting was that somehow it would wrong or bad for him to do so.

That's simply isn't true.

Well obviously people have different opinions on that, but I don't think anyone said it was wrong per se, but it could lead to negative things. Stunna's feedback would also probably mean less to a lot of people if he was just giving it out to everybody on this campaign, but that's just my opinion.  

[d2dtk]

Updated the signatures!

All users involved in PrimeDice's signature campaign will receive a PM shortly requesting they change their signature to the updated one!

Looks a lot less cluttered and should help clean the forum up as far as signature spam is currently concerned.

Having a consistent professional looking signature is going to do great for Bitcointalk and PD's website.

I've updated mine...Now to get the masses to do theirs

[freedomno1]

I was bored so I created this. Feel free to use/edit it however you like. You might think that it needs some more work or a better moto.

PRIMEDICE Find the gold pot at the end of the rain฿ow ⦅̶͊̄̏͂͝_̵̈́͐⦆@PrimeDice
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  

Code:

[url=https://primedice.com/][i][b][color=#FF7700]P[/color][color=#FFFF00]R[/color][color=#00FF00]I[/color][color=#00FFFF]M[/color][color=#0077FF]E[/color][color=#9900FF]D[/color][color=#FF0000]I[/color][color=#FF7700]C[/color][color=#FFFF00]E[/color][/b][/i][/url] [font=Comic Sans MS]Find the gold pot at the end of the rain฿ow[/font] [color=yellow][size=15pt]⦅̶͊̄̏͂͝_̵̈́͐⦆[/size][/color][url=https://twitter.com/primedice][color=#508DEA]@PrimeDice[/color][/url] 
[color=#FF0000]▀[/color][color=#FF7700]▀[/color][color=#FFFF00]▀[/color][color=#00FF00]▀[/color][color=#00FFFF]▀[/color][color=#0077FF]▀[/color][color=#9900FF]▀[/color][color=#FF0000]▀[/color][color=#FF7700]▀[/color][color=#FFFF00]▀[/color][color=#00FF00]▀[/color][color=#00FFFF]▀[/color][color=#0077FF]▀[/color][color=#9900FF]▀[/color][color=#FF0000]▀[/color][color=#FF7700]▀[/color][color=#FFFF00]▀[/color][color=#00FF00]▀[/color][color=#00FFFF]▀[/color][color=#0077FF]▀[/color][color=#9900FF]▀[/color][color=#FF0000]▀[/color][color=#FF7700]▀[/color][color=#FFFF00]▀[/color][color=#00FF00]▀[/color][color=#00FFFF]▀[/color][color=#0077FF]▀[/color][color=#9900FF]▀[/color][color=#FF0000]▀[/color][color=#FF7700]▀[/color][color=#FFFF00]▀[/color][color=#00FF00]▀[/color][color=#00FFFF]▀[/color][color=#0077FF]▀[/color][color=#9900FF]▀[/color][color=#FF0000]▀[/color][color=#FF7700]▀[/color][color=#FFFF00]▀[/color][color=#00FF00]▀[/color][color=#00FFFF]▀[/color][color=#0077FF]▀[/color][color=#9900FF]▀[/color][color=#FF0000]▀[/color][color=#FF7700]▀[/color][color=#FFFF00]▀[/color][color=#00FF00]▀[/color][color=#00FFFF]▀[/color][color=#0077FF]▀[/color][color=#9900FF]▀[/color]

Updated the signatures!

All users involved in PrimeDice's signature campaign will receive a PM shortly requesting they change their signature to the updated one!

Looks a lot less cluttered and should help clean the forum up as far as signature spam is currently concerned.

Update Clarification changed it to the orange version as per the giveaway thread
Should I change it to one on the OP posts?

Change it to one of the new designs.

I was thinking that but 6 days seems like a short difference and worth clarifying on.
I'll just wait to see if the other thread updates the sig since
Rule 1 Overrides Rule 2
- You must have a Primedice signature (Change your signature to the one in code brackets below). (So should be that one)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583663.msg6384917#msg6384917

I don't think he meant you have to literally change it to the exact one below. As long as you have a PD sig it's fine. Stunna really isn't going to try shaft you on a technicality like this either.

I felt the rainbow and yah probably not but thought it was a limited edition one so updated to that hehe.
Oh well I technically changed mine Wink will wait to see if I need to do that again hehe

[deisik]

Updated the signatures!

All users involved in PrimeDice's signature campaign will receive a PM shortly requesting they change their signature to the updated one!

Looks a lot less cluttered and should help clean the forum up as far as signature spam is currently concerned.

Having a consistent professional looking signature is going to do great for Bitcointalk and PD's website.

I've updated mine...Now to get the masses to do theirs

I think you signature presently doesn't look what Stunna would probably have wanted it to look...