Nevra (XEV) - Project is Terminated

[molamolamambow]

The rules for becoming a NevraStake holder are quite reasonable methods.
I think the project will achieve a great success!

[Madtanaa]

... I prefer to see based on individual contribution to the project to determine Distribution XEV, to achieve a relatively fair.

respectfully disagree to the above statement but only to a degree, if you check the project's whitepaper you will notice that the base foundations of  Nevra is equality, meaning all persons are treated equality regardless of skills or contribution, however the project tokens allocation does recognize major contributions such the project founder, developers  and even above and beyond actions contributing to the overall success of the project hence my statement "only to a degree". for the remaining members that do not have any of those qualities the only contribution that they can offer in my humble opinion is proof of promotion, a thing that the project is not pushing for at the moment although its time will come. I might be wrong as this is only my point of view. 
Note: if by contribution you meant activity then we are in the same page 
thank you!

[marcus13]

I am looking forward to receiving Air Drop

dont wait, contribution needed, give what you can to build a community, and I'm happy if this community bigger even if I'm just a supporter

[testadimerlo]

... I prefer to see based on individual contribution to the project to determine Distribution XEV, to achieve a relatively fair.

respectfully disagree to the above statement but only to a degree, if you check the project's whitepaper you will notice that the base foundations of  Nevra is equality, meaning all persons are treated equality regardless of skills or contribution, however the project tokens allocation does recognize major contributions such the project founder, developers  and even above and beyond actions contributing to the overall success of the project hence my statement "only to a degree". for the remaining members that do not have any of those qualities the only contribution that they can offer in my humble opinion is proof of promotion, a thing that the project is not pushing for at the moment although its time will come. I might be wrong as this is only my point of view.  
Note: if by contribution you meant activity then we are in the same page  
thank you!

Those who unfortunately don't have technical skills, I think it is quite fair if they simply help keeping this thread alive with relevant and useful comments. If one cares about the community, surely there will be time and way to give the best of themselves even after that the airdrop is done. Keep up the good work to all of you!

[junforever]

The project has a good concept, the key thing will be how the team promote it, I suggest some bounties using some kind of contest when the community contribute with new ideas and the best idea will recieve a reward for example... Continue with your goals!! 

[Cointyphoon]

I'm thrilled to discover such an innovative approach regarding token holders and the business model around creating of a strong community behind and backing the project first, than using nowadays approach of giveaways which, to me, creates unequality, is prone to speculation, creates disinterest from the community if prices aren't high... where people interested in money only are well served inspite of serving the project properly and getting behind it. Specially with loads of projects in the mix, most people are investing their money very short term expecting probably 10x return without even considering the foundation, the team, the project, the vision behind it etc... Putting the community first and at the centre of your project so as to create a strong bond where the community and the foundation can stay in touch is, for me, the best possible model going forward (You're not giving your money to some unknown folks out there, with whom you can't get in touch,  just because their project seems very promising and the hype is skying, right??)
I firmly believe that blockchain projects will stand long term mostly due to the community behind it. 80% tokens for the community equally shared around high values as freedom and trust is just a concept i thought i'd never came across in this capitalist world.
I am a big fan of infrastructure projects, the foundation of our tomorrow blockchain centered world, and i'm keen to go through your technical whitepaper. Anyway i'll be following you closely in the next couple of months and I'm sure you guys haven't finished to surprise us all.
Also, i haven't read your directive TK808, with all these holders and potentially the founder having only 3%, how is your Board going to operate, will it be with independent advisory, community involved ...?
Good luck with this and long live your concept, you've got my TRUST.

[maracuja1]

I would like to reserve the Spanish translation. Please let me know.

[smartcrypto]

checked out the website. Great work. The project moves ahead.

[student20151617]

I like the concept of this project, it means humble members like me can be treated the same as more senior members.
I have two questions though:

1. why do you limit the participant to be 1000, instead of letting more people share the pie?
2. I strongly support the idea of equality, however I think there is still a chance that whales can get a lot of shares.
    For example, someone can already used their bot accounts to have developed multiple senior accounts before the merit system is introduced to the forum, now if they like this project, they can jump in and use all their alts to reply here and get a share. One project I participated before obviously had this issue and it made everyone who just have one normal account's share significantly diluted....

Just my two cents, I think the bitcointalk reply can be combined with some other method, a twitter/facebook/telegram to distinguish the real person.

I will follow your project, good luck~

[xda-developer]

I think that additional verification will not very effective, but it is better than nothing. To be honest I can not imagine how it is posible to verify 1000 accounts, it is titanic job. For example verification through Telegram account will not the big proble for few alts, but if you have 20 - 30 alts it could be problem.

[night.0wl]

Nice project. I've read through almost the whole thread now, good to come across something else on this board then threads with "joined airdrop" "when bittrex".
There is actual discussion going on here, it's the start of a community. Going to be watching this one!

Voted for increasing the supply by the way.

[Cointyphoon]

I'm thrilled to discover such an innovative approach regarding token holders and the business model around creating of a strong community behind and backing the project first, than using nowadays approach of giveaways which, to me, creates unequality, is prone to speculation, creates disinterest from the community if prices aren't high... where people interested in money only are well served inspite of serving the project properly and getting behind it. Specially with loads of projects in the mix, most people are investing their money very short term expecting probably 10x return without even considering the foundation, the team, the project, the vision behind it etc... Putting the community first and at the centre of your project so as to create a strong bond where the community and the foundation can stay in touch is, for me, the best possible model going forward (You're not giving your money to some unknown folks out there, with whom you can't get in touch,  just because their project seems very promising and the hype is skying, right??)
I firmly believe that blockchain projects will stand long term mostly due to the community behind it. 80% tokens for the community equally shared around high values as freedom and trust is just a concept i thought i'd never came across in this capitalist world.
I am a big fan of infrastructure projects, the foundation of our tomorrow blockchain centered world, and i'm keen to go through your technical whitepaper. Anyway i'll be following you closely in the next couple of months and I'm sure you guys haven't finished to surprise us all.
Also, i haven't read your directive TK808, with all these holders and potentially the founder having only 3%, how is your Board going to operate, will it be with independent advisory, community involved ...?
Good luck with this and long live your concept, you've got my TRUST.

There is no need for a board, because it's unnecessary propaganda to hype coins. The only reason boards exist is because there is a bureaucracy with the coin, and often than not, those team members are answering to their masters, the ones who's faces you don't often see or notice, but are in charge of the coin. They are often the ones who put up some initial cash (like a VC) to get the coin off the ground.

We aren't taking a bureaucracy approach, i'm going to be as transparent as possible and involve the community in every-step of the way. I'll make this statement more clear on the hierarchy of Nevra when it comes time, but just know, no one controls this coin, no one is my master. Very few coins these days can boast such a thing.

I'm thrilled to discover such an innovative approach regarding token holders and the business model around creating of a strong community behind and backing the project first, than using nowadays approach of giveaways which, to me, creates unequality, is prone to speculation, creates disinterest from the community if prices aren't high... where people interested in money only are well served inspite of serving the project properly and getting behind it. Specially with loads of projects in the mix, most people are investing their money very short term expecting probably 10x return without even considering the foundation, the team, the project, the vision behind it etc... Putting the community first and at the centre of your project so as to create a strong bond where the community and the foundation can stay in touch is, for me, the best possible model going forward (You're not giving your money to some unknown folks out there, with whom you can't get in touch,  just because their project seems very promising and the hype is skying, right??)
I firmly believe that blockchain projects will stand long term mostly due to the community behind it. 80% tokens for the community equally shared around high values as freedom and trust is just a concept i thought i'd never came across in this capitalist world.
I am a big fan of infrastructure projects, the foundation of our tomorrow blockchain centered world, and i'm keen to go through your technical whitepaper. Anyway i'll be following you closely in the next couple of months and I'm sure you guys haven't finished to surprise us all.
Also, i haven't read your directive TK808, with all these holders and potentially the founder having only 3%, how is your Board going to operate, will it be with independent advisory, community involved ...?
Good luck with this and long live your concept, you've got my TRUST.

There is no need for a board, because it's unnecessary propaganda to hype coins. The only reason boards exist is because there is a bureaucracy with the coin, and often than not, those team members are answering to their masters, the ones who's faces you don't often see or notice, but are in charge of the coin. They are often the ones who put up some initial cash (like a VC) to get the coin off the ground.

We aren't taking a bureaucracy approach, i'm going to be as transparent as possible and involve the community in every-step of the way. I'll make this statement more clear on the hierarchy of Nevra when it comes time, but just know, no one controls this coin, no one is my master. Very few coins these days can boast such a thing.

Fully agree and no doubt every nice project has to overcome at some point hurdles and challenges to achieve its target. I sincerely hope you get the right support and advice at those points in your path to get NEVRA hitting the ground and running. All the best with the roadmap!

[goldexp83]

Great, so far I find the project very interesting, I missed on early projects like Deepcoin or Perl and I always wanted to be part of an early crypto group,
I will read the whitepaper in detail and contribute to the Nerva community!

[Rggadi]

Trust me, obviously everyone has some sort of guess/estimation/prediction and etc for price, even myself. But, rest assured, Nevra's development and etc will not stop no matter what the price is.

My goal is to make Nevra a top 100 coin, and that will happen. The object is not price, but to proove a point and have the new BTT witness how airdrop distribution, and tech is done, without generating 100s of millions for an ERC token riding on hot air.

Once the mainnet is launched, going to take all my talent and really focus more on features and development with that, alongside marketing.

I like your enthusiasm, as leader of this community, it helps to reassure and give confidence to people who want to invest in the project

[Laher]

Hi Guys,

New member here. Got into cryptocurrency recently and thus signed up for the XEV airdrop!

Now this is my first post, and I am actually a very recent holder of XEM. (I have enough that I can harvest on my own on a local server. but have not attempted it yet).

I sincerely like the technology of XEM, as it was built on new code, and has a lot of good real use cases in planning, which is why I got into it initially. What has concerned me, is XEM has allowed a socialist government, ran by a dictatorship, to use their blockchain for their local assets/currency. That is what has been announced on their social media twitter account.

Where does XEV stand on this issue? Of course a blockchain is free for anybody to use, but there must be some level of control as to whether it's use is for the same values it promotes, or the opposite.

I like how XEV is standing for equality, freedom and trust. This was the original goal of the first cryptocurrency, which was BTC, but it ended up being in control of miners, and whales. I like how this airdrop is geared towards promoting these original values, which I not only support them on this forum, but also critique. I believe equality, freedom and trust can be garnered on a blockchain, only with equal distribution of coins, where whales cannot hoard large amounts for their own gain, which is predominant in a lot of top coins now.

In this instance, the developers choice not to hold an ico, or ask for donations, is a great move, as it will ensure coin distribution can be done on merit and interest, instead of how large the bag is, and how much profit one is going to make in the end. I believe more can be done on marketing this airdrop, so more people can be involved, and thus more coins be distributed evenly across the world, but of course I respect the whitepapers and founders decision to remain low key in this aspect. To be honest, with 1000 stakes, the low key aspect should be effective, as long as bots and hoarders are weeded out. I love the idea that you will have three rounds in april to filter out puppet accounts. Is this right? I don't need to know how you will implement this, some secrecy regarding your methods would be beneficial to the KYC process, I believe.

I am looking forward to the white paper being updated, in April, so I can look at the more technical aspects of this project. Do you plan on implementing anything like Catapult? What is your ambition regarding the TPS the network will run at?

Really liking the fact that you the founder is trying to prove a point on principle, than chasing moons. Thank you for starting this project. Wish you success, and a further continued zeal for genuity.

Btw is your username based of the roland 808 ? Nice drum machine

[sorin90]

I am looking forward to receiving Air Drop

LOL. If you are looking forward on it, why don;t you try to be useful in the discution. The airdrop is really fair giving the same chance to all members from newbies to legends, but you need to provide real posts not just spams. Try reading a little about the coin. I think you can find some interesting facts in there.

[sorin90]

The core of the project is equality, freedom and trust. Behind the good ideals, don't go into a misunderstanding and become utopian.
Because each person's ability is not the same, can not be equal, I prefer to see based on individual contribution to the project to determine Distribution XEV, to achieve a relatively fair. Hope DEV can pay attention to this problem

Well your not completely right on that. Because not all the members get paid. Those that don't provide real feed-back will not get their stakes. The rest will, and all equal, and I have to agree with this decision. You're right we are all different but some of us might have 100 ideas and some might have 1 idea better then all the others. So on what do you think they can base the distribution on? If they pay per feed-back it won't be fair for the one that has the brilliant idea, if they pay more the guy with the brilliant idea the others will start talking maybe fuding, because they think the are those that deserve a bigger part. So the equal distribution could be the best solution and in my opinion the fairest.

[WalkerJose]

I like Trust-less.
So I'm skeptical about the word Trust me.
But, it looks like you are enjoying talking about the project.
If you enjoy it, a lot of collaborators will appear and the project will succeed.
good luck.

[3meek]

Likes that you use nanowallet! I will monitor your project! Maybe it's something new... And I would like you to use a blockchain NEM! NEM has no problems with network scalability and low transaction fees! Good luck to you!

[asche]

Trust me, obviously everyone has some sort of guess/estimation/prediction and etc for price, even myself. But, rest assured, Nevra's development and etc will not stop no matter what the price is.

My goal is to make Nevra a top 100 coin, and that will happen. The object is not price, but to proove a point and have the new BTT witness how airdrop distribution, and tech is done, without generating 100s of millions for an ERC token riding on hot air.

Once the mainnet is launched, going to take all my talent and really focus more on features and development with that, alongside marketing.

Your motivation stands out! I really hope this will work, and will do my best to keep helping.