Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 11:57:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: 0 second block!  (Read 1097 times)
deepceleron (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1028



View Profile WWW
July 16, 2011, 05:09:07 PM
 #1

Block 136583:

{
  "hash":"00000000000001d7635c5037bd97519b583cd995a56edc0018dfb9a39106f758",
  "ver":1,
  "prev_block":"000000000000003f767918da359ac0dd5728edc90552b0e4f4af59419d1b70f5",
  "mrkl_root":"2d9712cefa0f81ac0fb6cb0812567c5f572ab9f0309e803fb01b039e1938fdf6",
  "time":1310829862,


Block 136584:

{
  "hash":"000000000000035ac219a1a52dde48ccd7348deed858b1da47b0f16b7ac70ea2",
  "ver":1,
  "prev_block":"00000000000001d7635c5037bd97519b583cd995a56edc0018dfb9a39106f758",
  "mrkl_root":"61e5c0c6a611568131217f21b69a4ac96c5bb5598a704627a3aecf8584d1ff9c",
  "time":1310829862,


Is this a first? Did deepbit just figure out the ultimate hack to avoid invalid blocks?  Tongue


1714953461
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714953461

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714953461
Reply with quote  #2

1714953461
Report to moderator
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714953461
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714953461

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714953461
Reply with quote  #2

1714953461
Report to moderator
1714953461
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714953461

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714953461
Reply with quote  #2

1714953461
Report to moderator
casascius
Mike Caldwell
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1136


The Casascius 1oz 10BTC Silver Round (w/ Gold B)


View Profile WWW
July 16, 2011, 05:12:19 PM
 #2

What's invalid?  The fact that the timestamp is the same doesn't mean that the blocks happened at the exact same time.  The time stamp of the later block can actually be earlier than the earlier one.  Why?  Because the timestamp is taken from the system clock of the computer doing the mining, which is likely not synchronized with atomic time.

Bitcoin doesn't validate the timestamps to precision - it only validates them to be within a reasonable window, like two hours.

Companies claiming they got hacked and lost your coins sounds like fraud so perfect it could be called fashionable.  I never believe them.  If I ever experience the misfortune of a real intrusion, I declare I have been honest about the way I have managed the keys in Casascius Coins.  I maintain no ability to recover or reproduce the keys, not even under limitless duress or total intrusion.  Remember that trusting strangers with your coins without any recourse is, as a matter of principle, not a best practice.  Don't keep coins online. Use paper or hardware wallets instead.
deepceleron (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1028



View Profile WWW
July 16, 2011, 05:32:08 PM
Last edit: July 18, 2011, 07:47:16 PM by deepceleron
 #3

What's invalid?  The fact that the timestamp is the same doesn't mean that the blocks happened at the exact same time.  The time stamp of the later block can actually be earlier than the earlier one.  Why?  Because the timestamp is taken from the system clock of the computer doing the mining, which is likely not synchronized with atomic time.

Bitcoin doesn't validate the timestamps to precision - it only validates them to be within a reasonable window, like two hours.

I see: A timestamp is accepted as valid if it is greater than the median timestamp of previous 11 blocks, and less than the network-adjusted time + 2 hours. "Network-adjusted time" is the median of the timestamps returned by all nodes connected to you.

So there is no joy in this statistic... either miner's time could have been off - and a clock time could be up to ~1 hour negative and still be valid depending on the previous blocks.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!