Bitcoin Forum
July 16, 2019, 05:23:56 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: BREAKING NEWS: REWT ADMITS TO BEING A SCAMMER! NEG TRUST HIS ASS!!  (Read 2225 times)
h4xx0r
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100

★Bitin.io★ - Instant Exchange


View Profile
September 17, 2013, 07:26:08 PM
 #1

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=231217.msg3175360#msg3175360

Sorry Scammer!

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
r3wt
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


always the student, never the master.


View Profile
September 17, 2013, 07:29:47 PM
 #2

SMDH, i said i was sorry. what the hell did i ever do to you? pwn your botnet?

My negative trust rating is reflective of a personal vendetta by someone on default trust.
jdebunt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
September 17, 2013, 07:41:10 PM
 #3

atleast he had the balls to admit his mistake(s), very few of the people around here would do that.

We still love ya R3wt Smiley
ahmed_bodi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500

Bitrated user: ahmedbodi.


View Profile
September 17, 2013, 07:41:35 PM
 #4

+10000 r3wt

Bitrated user: ahmedbodi.
Kalimankudenku
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 07:45:06 PM
 #5

atleast he had the balls to admit his mistake(s), very few of the people around here would do that.

We still love ya R3wt Smiley

I like that! Smiley
r3wt
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


always the student, never the master.


View Profile
September 17, 2013, 08:02:10 PM
 #6

dont encourage him, he was blantatly extorting people, that means he sucks, the only reason he apologized his cause he got caught. My guess is he is still doing it. We are supposed to reject these type of people on the forums, not encourage.


p.s. if this is how he operates then how can we trust OSC.

j

go read that entire thread. that was all the way back in june. it all started as a joke, a thread about scamming scammers but bdub messaged me offering to pay for "protection" and i accepted, then bam, he had me with pictures and i lied my way out. jump to i saw him posting on the forum earlier and dug up this thread and admitted.

My negative trust rating is reflective of a personal vendetta by someone on default trust.
Reaper3
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 08:22:09 PM
 #7

There are to many scammers. Think I will start a poll to find out the percentage.

CHANGE FINANCE First Decentralised Global Crypto Bank
[color=#15B5E2 ]LINK TO ICO | LINK TO DISCUSSION
rumlazy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 203
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 08:26:18 PM
 #8


p.s. if this is how he operates then how can we trust OSC.

j

You can't.  Look at NAN and J-Coin and ask yourself what's gonna happen here. 
r3wt
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


always the student, never the master.


View Profile
September 17, 2013, 08:28:27 PM
 #9


p.s. if this is how he operates then how can we trust OSC.

j

You can't.  Look at NAN and J-Coin and ask yourself what's gonna happen here. 

yeah you got me. i'm totally not gonna provide any support (even though i'm busting my ass to resurrect NAN, while your doing what exactly? sitting on your ass and bumping your gums on the computer. so noble)

My negative trust rating is reflective of a personal vendetta by someone on default trust.
rumlazy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 203
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 08:30:17 PM
 #10


p.s. if this is how he operates then how can we trust OSC.

j

You can't.  Look at NAN and J-Coin and ask yourself what's gonna happen here. 

yeah you got me. i'm totally not gonna provide any support (even though i'm busting my ass to resurrect NAN, while your doing what exactly? sitting on your ass and bumping your gums on the computer. so noble)

I don't have to do anything.  I didn't release a coin.  You're "busting" your ass trying to fix your coin but it's been off cryptsy now for how long?  Try supporting your first two coins before you release another. 
r3wt
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


always the student, never the master.


View Profile
September 17, 2013, 08:46:04 PM
 #11


p.s. if this is how he operates then how can we trust OSC.

j

You can't.  Look at NAN and J-Coin and ask yourself what's gonna happen here.  

yeah you got me. i'm totally not gonna provide any support (even though i'm busting my ass to resurrect NAN, while your doing what exactly? sitting on your ass and bumping your gums on the computer. so noble)

I don't have to do anything.  I didn't release a coin.  You're "busting" your ass trying to fix your coin but it's been off cryptsy now for how long?  Try supporting your first two coins before you release another.  

fair enough, however i began OSC all the way back in july. the Nanotokens catastrophe came at an inoppurtune time. the temporary fix for nan would be to distribute the correct blockchain(which i have) with the current client in an installer package. i could do this right now. instead, i'm after a permanent solution that stops the coin from getting stranded for weeks at high difficulty, syncing to dgc chain, having broken block values, forking due to lack of seednodes-- you know all the things that made it a piece of shit to begin with and take real time and creativity/effort to fix. but hey, i've already fixed all of that, but there is an issue of the merkle root being rejected since i changed the network id(pchstarttime). this is a real bitch and tbh i'm trying to find a solution. build after build its ASSERTION FAILED!. fucking frustrating.  so while i respect your opinion, but you speak as if nothing is being done when it actually is.

My negative trust rating is reflective of a personal vendetta by someone on default trust.
The Goat Master
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 502



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 09:00:59 PM
 #12

atleast he had the balls to admit his mistake(s), very few of the people around here would do that.

We still love ya R3wt Smiley

I agree with that.  Not everybody admits it.

            ██
         ▄▄▀  ▀▄
        ▄▀▀▄▄▄  ▀▄
      ▄██▄▄▄▄▄██▄▄▀▄
    ▄▀ █  ▄▄▀▀ █  █ ▀▄▄
  ▄▀  ██▀█ ▄▀▀▄ █ █  █▀▄
██   █ █▐▌█ ██ █ ██ █   ██
  ▀▄█  █ █ ▀▄▄▀▄▄███  ▄▀
   ▀▀▄ █▄▄█▄█▀▀   █ ▄▀
      ▀▄▀▀▄▄ ▀▀▀▀██▀
        ▀▄  ▀▀▄▄▄▀
          ▀▄  ▄▀▀
            ██
.
    ▄▄███████▄▄
  ▄███▀▀   ▀▀███▄
 ███▀         ▀▀
███
███
███
 ███▄         ▄▄
  ▀███▄▄   ▄▄███▀
    ▀▀███████▀▀
██████████▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███▄
          ▀██▌
          ▄██▌
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███▀
██████████▀
██▌    ▀███▄
██▌      ▀███▄
██▌        ▀███
█████████████



█████████████



█████████████
        ██
       ████
      ██▌▐██
     ██▌  ▐██
    ██▌    ▐██
   ██▌      ▐██
  ██▌        ▐██
 ██▌          ▐██
██▌    ███████████
██████████████▌
      ██▌
      ██▌
      ██▌
      ██▌
      ██▌
      ██▌
      ██▌
      ██▌
    ▄▄███████▄▄
  ▄███▀▀   ▀▀███▄
 ███▀         ▀███
███             ███
███             ███
███             ███
 ███▄         ▄███
  ▀███▄▄   ▄▄███▀
    ▀▀███████▀▀
██████████▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███▄
          ▀██▌
          ▄██▌
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███▀
██████████▀
██▌    ▀███▄
██▌      ▀███▄
██▌        ▀███



 ▄▄
████
 ▀▀
        ██
       ████
      ██▌▐██
     ██▌  ▐██
    ██▌    ▐██
   ██▌      ▐██
  ██▌        ▐██
 ██▌          ▐██
██▌    ███████████
██▌
██▌
██▌
██▌
██▌
██▌
██▌
██▌
██▌
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███

███
███

███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███

███
███

███
███
.▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀    WHITEPAPER    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀.
FACEBOOK       REDDIT       TELEGRAM
BITCOINTALK   TWITTER   INSTAGRAM
greyhawk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 17, 2013, 09:02:50 PM
 #13

dont encourage him, he was blantatly extorting people, that means he sucks, the only reason he apologized his cause he got caught. My guess is he is still doing it. We are supposed to reject these type of people on the forums, not encourage.

Excuse me, but that just means he knows how to deal with a free market. The time for your antiquated statist rules is over, praised be Bitcoin and Satoshi is its prophet.
r3wt
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


always the student, never the master.


View Profile
September 17, 2013, 09:04:29 PM
 #14

no people, i should deserve the untrustworthy tag. that way atleast people will know what i've done. mathew wright got the untrustworthy tag and he didn't even scam no one. now granted, no one liked that guy in the first place but still, there can't be a double standard am i right? if i'm not awarded untrustworthy tag for my actions it sends the message that scammers can just apologize and everyone will forgive them.

at the very least i should get negative trust until i have paid back igotspots and apologized to bdub.

My negative trust rating is reflective of a personal vendetta by someone on default trust.
The Goat Master
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 502



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 09:06:31 PM
 #15

no people, i should deserve the untrustworthy tag. that way atleast people will know what i've done. mathew wright got the untrustworthy tag and he didn't even scam no one. now granted, no one liked that guy in the first place but still, there can't be a double standard am i right? if i'm not awarded untrustworthy tag for my actions it sends the message that scammers can just apologize and everyone will forgive them.

at the very least i should get negative trust until i have paid back igotspots and apologized to bdub.
Matthew wright got the untrustworthy tag?  I thought he was a VIP and made that up.  What did he do?

            ██
         ▄▄▀  ▀▄
        ▄▀▀▄▄▄  ▀▄
      ▄██▄▄▄▄▄██▄▄▀▄
    ▄▀ █  ▄▄▀▀ █  █ ▀▄▄
  ▄▀  ██▀█ ▄▀▀▄ █ █  █▀▄
██   █ █▐▌█ ██ █ ██ █   ██
  ▀▄█  █ █ ▀▄▄▀▄▄███  ▄▀
   ▀▀▄ █▄▄█▄█▀▀   █ ▄▀
      ▀▄▀▀▄▄ ▀▀▀▀██▀
        ▀▄  ▀▀▄▄▄▀
          ▀▄  ▄▀▀
            ██
.
    ▄▄███████▄▄
  ▄███▀▀   ▀▀███▄
 ███▀         ▀▀
███
███
███
 ███▄         ▄▄
  ▀███▄▄   ▄▄███▀
    ▀▀███████▀▀
██████████▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███▄
          ▀██▌
          ▄██▌
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███▀
██████████▀
██▌    ▀███▄
██▌      ▀███▄
██▌        ▀███
█████████████



█████████████



█████████████
        ██
       ████
      ██▌▐██
     ██▌  ▐██
    ██▌    ▐██
   ██▌      ▐██
  ██▌        ▐██
 ██▌          ▐██
██▌    ███████████
██████████████▌
      ██▌
      ██▌
      ██▌
      ██▌
      ██▌
      ██▌
      ██▌
      ██▌
    ▄▄███████▄▄
  ▄███▀▀   ▀▀███▄
 ███▀         ▀███
███             ███
███             ███
███             ███
 ███▄         ▄███
  ▀███▄▄   ▄▄███▀
    ▀▀███████▀▀
██████████▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███▄
          ▀██▌
          ▄██▌
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███▀
██████████▀
██▌    ▀███▄
██▌      ▀███▄
██▌        ▀███



 ▄▄
████
 ▀▀
        ██
       ████
      ██▌▐██
     ██▌  ▐██
    ██▌    ▐██
   ██▌      ▐██
  ██▌        ▐██
 ██▌          ▐██
██▌    ███████████
██▌
██▌
██▌
██▌
██▌
██▌
██▌
██▌
██▌
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███

███
███

███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███

███
███

███
███
.▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀    WHITEPAPER    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀.
FACEBOOK       REDDIT       TELEGRAM
BITCOINTALK   TWITTER   INSTAGRAM
greyhawk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 17, 2013, 09:08:45 PM
 #16

no people, i should deserve the untrustworthy tag. that way atleast people will know what i've done. mathew wright got the untrustworthy tag and he didn't even scam no one. now granted, no one liked that guy in the first place but still, there can't be a double standard am i right? if i'm not awarded untrustworthy tag for my actions it sends the message that scammers can just apologize and everyone will forgive them.

at the very least i should get negative trust until i have paid back igotspots and apologized to bdub.
Matthew wright got the untrustworthy tag?  I thought he was a VIP and made that up.  What did he do?

Break a gentlemens agreement with several hundred gentlemen.
r3wt
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


always the student, never the master.


View Profile
September 17, 2013, 09:14:41 PM
 #17

seriously people, i did all of this

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=231217.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=263994.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=296144.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=128281

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=128281

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=231141.msg2430014#msg2430014

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=230852.msg2426813#msg2426813

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=220644.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=265209.0

i deserve it, you all know it.

My negative trust rating is reflective of a personal vendetta by someone on default trust.
clock27
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 10:08:16 PM
 #18

+420 interwebs for you for admitting it dude

Vod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2800
Merit: 2269


Licking my boob since 1970


View Profile WWW
September 17, 2013, 10:24:08 PM
 #19

I dont think tags are issued anymore.  People should just flag with negative trust.

I'm into creating universes, smiting people, writing holy books and listening to Prayer Messages (PMs).
BitcoinTalk Public Information Project (BPIP)  - BPIP Reports
"Masturbation makes you feel good but doesn't do anything for the person you're thinking of.  Just like prayer."
Welsh
Staff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1460



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 11:53:18 PM
 #20

It's good that you have actually admitted and haven't just created another account. It does take balls to do it. I hope this is the last of it. But, OP he was a scammer but he did very thing in his power to make everyone not lose out. Therefore actually didn't scam as he refunded everyone.


I remember having a discussion on r3wt as I didn't trust him at one point. I can't say I trust him now and would require escrow. But, he did actually an up.

Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!