Token sale conditions, what to choose??

[haidangtp]

It doesnt matter how the tokens are sold,the most important thing to have is the support from the community even if the project has good token allocation it doesnt mean it will achieve success,not without the community's help so you need to have a good advertising team so it will have some exposure in the community.

but for me a is better than b.

I agree with you. A successful project is based on the support of investors. In order to do this, it is necessary to communicate information and advertise effectively.

[1715364815]

1715364815

[1715364815]

1715364815

[1715364815]

1715364815

[1715364815]

1715364815

[kryptqnick]

Kindly help  

Emagine that you (investor) and had already analyzed all project conditions (idea, product, team, etc.) and they satisfied you.
The project is a unique p2p cryptocurrency-fiat and swap exchange with MPV being published before ICO.

Then you face project's Token sale conditions ....... and ....my question what token allocation scheme you would like most (a) or (b)?

I think option 'b' is a lot better, since it saves some money as a reserve for product's growth in the future. Plus, the team gets less of the money officially. Perhaps I would reduce their share even more, for it is still rather big. Yet what is bad about the scheme is that only half is sold on public sale, whereas the majority of another half is in the hands of developers or their partners. This creates a situation where it would be too easy to manipulate the price and the coin will hardly be decentralized. You should take it into consideration and maybe just lower down the reserve and add some more to public sale.

[Kramblerty]

Kindly help  

Emagine that you (investor) and had already analyzed all project conditions (idea, product, team, etc.) and they satisfied you.
The project is a unique p2p cryptocurrency-fiat and swap exchange with MPV being published before ICO.

Then you face project's Token sale conditions ....... and ....my question what token allocation scheme you would like most (a) or (b)?

I think option 'b' is a lot better, since it saves some money as a reserve for product's growth in the future. Plus, the team gets less of the money officially. Perhaps I would reduce their share even more, for it is still rather big. Yet what is bad about the scheme is that only half is sold on public sale, whereas the majority of another half is in the hands of developers or their partners. This creates a situation where it would be too easy to manipulate the price and the coin will hardly be decentralized. You should take it into consideration and maybe just lower down the reserve and add some more to public sale.

You are right! here (below) the reconsidered token sale conditions:

[Kramblerty]

Reconsidering all your comments, we now think about such allocation scheme:

Reserve: 5 years hold with 6 month 10% cliffs. It will be applied to inspire confidence to the contributors and facilitate the future platform growth.
Prices: not too high price discounts from 5 to 20% and limitations for pre-sale amounts (max $ 5k).
Team: jsut 10% to the team with 2 years hold _ 6-month 25% cliffs

Kindly comment this new allocation.


Amount of Tokens = 20 000 000
Offered to public = 14 000 000
All unsold tokens will be burned.

pre-ICO price
- $0.40 (20% discount) duration is 2 weeks
Max. contribution amount from one account = $5 000 equvalent

ICO price  
- $0.425 (15% discount) 1 week
- $.045   (10% discount) 2 week    
- $.0475 (5% discount)   3 week  
- $.050   (0% discount)   4 week  
    


- 70% Public
- 16,7% Growth Reserve (5 years hold with 6-month 10% cliffs )
- 10% team (2 years hold with 6-month 25% cliffs)
- 3,3% bounties

[Vazil]

Reconsidering all your comments, we now think about such allocation scheme:

Reserve: 5 years hold with 6 month 10% cliffs. It will be applied to inspire confidence to the contributors and facilitate the future platform growth.
Prices: not too high price discounts from 5 to 20% and limitations for pre-sale amounts (max $ 5k).
Team: jsut 10% to the team with 2 years hold _ 6-month 25% cliffs

Kindly comment this new allocation.


Amount of Tokens = 20 000 000
Offered to public = 14 000 000
All unsold tokens will be burned.

pre-ICO price
- $0.40 (20% discount) duration is 2 weeks
Max. contribution amount to one account = $5 000 equvalent

ICO price   
- $0.425 (15% discount) 1 week
- $.045   (10% discount) 2 week     
- $.0475 (5% discount)   3 week 
- $.050   (0% discount)   4 week 
     


- 70% Public
- 16,7% Growth Reserve (5 years hold with 6-month 10% cliffs )
- 10% team (2 years hold with 6-month 25% cliffs)
- 3,3% bounties

now, this allocation looks better  than (a) and (b)

[Kramblerty]

We also feel that this last scheme is better; but want to hear more feedbacks prior to apply it 

[Jekbolt]

if you are planning to use some special service providers and pay them with your tokens immediately after ICO then you should add a small "angel" investor share..

[Kramblerty]

if you are planning to use some special service providers and pay them with your tokens immediately after ICO then you should add a small "angel" investor share..

Indeed, we do need to keep a very small share for that purposes. Thanks for pointing it out!

[Kramblerty]

if you are planning to use some special service providers and pay them with your tokens immediately after ICO then you should add a small "angel" investor share..

Is 2% for "angel" investors are normal (in current market conditions)? How do you think?

[Cryptohad]

I prefer choosing (a) and (b). and option (c) more will allow unsold tokens.

I prefer a crowdsale sale that has a way of more and more quickly attract investors!

[Kramblerty]

I prefer choosing (a) and (b). and option (c) more will allow unsold tokens.

I prefer a crowdsale sale that has a way of more and more quickly attract investors!

So (c) offers a good stake to public (70%) and still have some reserve for future growth. win-win -)

[Vazil]

I prefer choosing (a) and (b). and option (c) more will allow unsold tokens.

I prefer a crowdsale sale that has a way of more and more quickly attract investors!

So (c) offers a good stake to public (70%) and still have some reserve for future growth. win-win -)

70% offered to the public is a normal rate! no one will tell that this is too low level.

[Kramblerty]

70% is more than average share... among those projects, which decided to keep some part as a growth reserve

[Kramblerty]

70% is more than average share... among those projects, which decided to keep some part as a growth reserve

Maybe we will decrease it from 70% to 65% and increase reserve +5%..still thinking