I'm not into separatism and primitivism. My point is to have a nation where we can enjoy laws that is just and fair that is truly for the people. Not under the laws of the tyrant nations. Of course we can still export and import to other nations.
Yes, but this would be free trade, and if we had this, the world would be a lot better than it currently is. There are always strings attached, and ultimately it boils down to the biggest nation having the better deals and the louder voice, as their military can always wipe out your military so it's in your interest to cut them a really nice deal on whatever it is you're exporting, and take the higher price "because we're pals" when importing--and if you don't like that, tough bananas.
And if nothing else, they can just claim ownership over your plot of land. What are you gonna do, fight back?
So, no, you will not enjoy both freedom and free trade among authoritarian nations; you will have to sacrifice your freedoms in return of not being pelted with bombs if you decide not to comply with the bigger nation. Because of these conditions, you will need an organized society capable of being controlled to ensure these demands are met "to keep the peace", thereby requiring a leader and whatnot, all the same luxuries of every other authoritarian society. The project to create a nation of freedom deteriorates into a resort for the rich and elite, as those with money squeeze their way into politics and write their doings legal (since they otherwise would be under extreme scrutiny), and as the lower class complains, perhaps even protests, they can really do nothing but, at the very end, begin a revolution and overthrow the current rulers to be replaced with another with the same intent, but he has a nice smile and just happens to have a lot of money and promises to help the poor, you know, all the lies politicians come up with to stay in power. The cycle repeats indefinitely, until the people of the largest nations decide to stop funding the war machine and take control over their own lives, where the free-nation project becomes a moot point anyway, perhaps even a danger to the now free societies who must defend against the remaining states, including this one, with a leader completely out of touch with his people and a large enough military (at the cost of everything else, running a debt greater than his people can pay off in a generation) to ensure nobody can overthrow him easily, and ready to attack any vulnerable nation, seeing the stateless societies as "fair game".
Anyway, this is how I see it panning out. If you can think of a way to make this operate without the influence of other nations, you might have something.
