Couple of things;
The biggest surprise for me was that he was living in the U.S. I had that sob pegged for Mexico or, at the least, some other non-US jurisdiction - I mean, it was no secret he was one of the most-wanted shoving-it-in-their-face crims of recent years, and conducting that kind of operation in mainland US surely only made it that much more likely for the federālie to pick up on his dirty trail sooner or later.
There's already been quite a release of fascinating details about the man-the-myth and the operation which led to his arrest; I'm thinking of the matter-of-fact revelations about him hiring an assassin to go kill some dude, the motivation he had for doing it and how they've got him pinned for the crime. Isn't the public release of this kind of thing considered to bias a future trial? In many countries this kind of release or leak of evidence would seriously jeopardize their admissibility in any court proceeding because association of guilt has already been inferred in public, and so making it hardly possible to conduct a fair and unbiased trial on these charges.
EDIT: you know, actually -
do me a favour and ignore me; I'm always eager to be pissed at other people who take a thread off-on-a-tangent, and this here ponderment of mine is just fucking that.
