Seuntjies DiceBot -Multi-Site, multi-strategy betting bot for dice. With Charts!

[seuntjie]

I have created a forum for DiceBot discussions at https://forum.seuntjie.com. Feel free to register an account there and create a thread if you have questions or suggestions, or need help with something.

[1714796626]

1714796626

[1714796626]

1714796626

[1714796626]

1714796626

[1714796626]

1714796626

[seuntjie]

hi does anyone know why i can get it to run all it does is give me a log file with errors see below
########################################################################################

FATAL CRASH

System.Data.SQLite.SQLiteException (0x80004005): unable to open database file
   at System.Data.SQLite.SQLite3.Open(String strFilename, SQLiteConnectionFlags connectionFlags, SQLiteOpenFlagsEnum openFlags, Int32 maxPoolSize, Boolean usePool)
   at System.Data.SQLite.SQLiteConnection.Open()
   at DiceBot.sqlite_helper.GetConnection()
   at DiceBot.sqlite_helper.CheckDBS()
   at DiceBot.cDiceBot..ctor(String[] args)
   at DiceBot.Program.Main(String[] args)
########################################################################################
########################################################################################

running more than one instance of the bot can cause this.
Make sure you extracted the bot with all of its files and it has access to read and write to the folder it is in. (see bot.seuntjie.com/gettingStarted.aspx)
Do not open the dciebot.db file in another program before opening the bot or while it is running

[seuntjie]

Hi Seuntjie

I am having a very hard time trying to log into Yolodice. I put my username, private key and 2fa code but the bot always displays the following error "Failed to log in to your account on YoloDice. Check the status bar for more information if available". I have tried everything, changed my API key, disabling 2fa, running an older version of dicebot, etc, but I still can't login. Is the bot experiencing problems with this site?

Thanks

EDIT: Let me also clarify that I have read the FAQ, specifically the question"I am unable to log in to site x (Failed to log in or create new account) even though I'm sure my username is correct. Please Help!" but none of those cases apply for me.

Are you sure you're using your private key and not your public key?
Is the API key you're using enabled on yolodice?
Do you have a firewall or proxy that blocks outgoing tcp connections on port 4444?
What does it say at the bottom of the bot/in the status bar?
What does the dicebotlog.txt file contain directly after trying to log in?

It seems like sometimes certain peoples' DNS would resolve the wrong address for api.yolodice.com, and then the bot would be unable to connect. I don't know what causes this and I have yet to confirm that it is actually the issue. Try changing your DNS server and see if that helps.

[seuntjie]

Hi Seuntjie. The problem persist.

Are you sure you're using your private key and not your public key? 100% sure
Is the API key you're using enabled on yolodice? Yes
Do you have a firewall or proxy that blocks outgoing tcp connections on port 4444? I opened that port as per your instructions, both in Windows Firewall and in my router. I even disabled Windows Firewall.
What does it say at the bottom of the bot/in the status bar? Status/Current action: Disconnected
What does the dicebotlog.txt file contain directly after trying to log in?

System.Net.Sockets.SocketException (0x80004005): Se produjo un error durante el intento de conexión ya que la parte conectada no respondió adecuadamente tras un periodo de tiempo, o bien se produjo un error en la conexión establecida ya que el host conectado no ha podido responder 52.208.177.198:4444
   at System.Net.Sockets.TcpClient.Connect(String hostname, Int32 port)
   at DiceBot.YoloDice.Login(String Username, String Password, String twofa)

I was using google DNS, reverted back to my ISP's DNS but it didn't work. I am able to login to other sites without problems (Primedice).

Thanks for your help.


EDIT: The problem seems to be the port 4444. I performed a test on portquiz.net and it seems most ports work well, like 4443 or 4445, but not 4444. Something in my network is blocking it, despite I created a rule on Windows firewall. Is there any way to change this port, or it is strictly required by Yolodice?

Unfortunately, 4444 is the only port specified by Yolodice for the API.

[B_UN1T]

After Version 3.3.5 i miss this feature on statspage


http://prntscr.com/ivgas7

[seuntjie]

After Version 3.3.5 i miss this feature on statspage


http://prntscr.com/ivgas7

It's not accurate, in many cases, impossible to calculate and not worth looking at.

[kowmar]

I want to say my opinion. Since I use the bot, I have often faced problems. Problem-when you hover to any number in the bot, if you scroll the mouse wheel - the data changes, EVEN WHEN THE BOAT WORKS! It's very simple for 0.1 second to change the onloss from 1.1 to 99. I ask you to make sure that the work of Dicebot stops betting, if at the time of its work ANY% or bet change occurred. So that we know that something has changed and can create problems. sorry for my bad english

[seuntjie]

I want to say my opinion. Since I use the bot, I have often faced problems. Problem-when you hover to any number in the bot, if you scroll the mouse wheel - the data changes, EVEN WHEN THE BOAT WORKS! It's very simple for 0.1 second to change the onloss from 1.1 to 99. I ask you to make sure that the work of Dicebot stops betting, if at the time of its work ANY% or bet change occurred. So that we know that something has changed and can create problems. sorry for my bad english

The bot was like that initially, but many people like to change settings while the bot is running and requested I change it. I would like to have an option to allow/deny the user to change the options while it's running, but wit hthe way v3 of the is designed, It's very difficult to implement. My suggestion would be to be careful where you focus your mouse while the bot is running (It's a dick thing to say, I know)

[kowmar]

I want to say my opinion. Since I use the bot, I have often faced problems. Problem-when you hover to any number in the bot, if you scroll the mouse wheel - the data changes, EVEN WHEN THE BOAT WORKS! It's very simple for 0.1 second to change the onloss from 1.1 to 99. I ask you to make sure that the work of Dicebot stops betting, if at the time of its work ANY% or bet change occurred. So that we know that something has changed and can create problems. sorry for my bad english

The bot was like that initially, but many people like to change settings while the bot is running and requested I change it. I would like to have an option to allow/deny the user to change the options while it's running, but wit hthe way v3 of the is designed, It's very difficult to implement. My suggestion would be to be careful where you focus your mouse while the bot is running (It's a dick thing to say, I know)

Thanks for the reply. I think it would be a good decision to restore this function. At least make a check mark that can be turned on or off, which will or will not give change data during the game.

[HCP]

Thanks for the reply. I think it would be a good decision to restore this function. At least make a check mark that can be turned on or off, which will or will not give change data during the game.

As Seuntjie already said:

... I would like to have an option to allow/deny the user to change the options while it's running, but wit hthe way v3 of the is designed, It's very difficult to implement...

My suggestion would be to be careful where you focus your mouse while the bot is running (It's a dick thing to say, I know)

Personally, I think that's a fair comment. I see it as similar to operating a chainsaw... the operator needs to take adequate precautions or "Bad Things"™ will happen

[selffish]

anybody know the worst loosing streak? Is there more then 32?`thx for help

[B4RF]

anybody know the worst loosing streak? Is there more then 32?`thx for help

There were some competitions like this one for winning streaks which is almost the same if you are going for 2x bets.
The mentioned competition has been won with a streak of 21 and has only been run for a week.

So much longer loosing streaks should be common and that being said any loosing streak can happen so you wont be save after x losses.

[seuntjie]

anybody know the worst loosing streak? Is there more then 32?`thx for help

Longest losing streak that I know of at x2 was 32 or 33. There was a winning streak at x2 of 34 I think. But know that when you're dealing with random numbers, there is no maximum losing streak. You CAN lose all of your bets you ever place at x2. Don't bargain on a losing streak of 34 ending in a win.

[B_UN1T]

After Version 3.3.5 i miss this feature on statspage


http://prntscr.com/ivgas7

It's not accurate, in many cases, impossible to calculate and not worth looking at.

I wish you can bring this number back even its not accuarte you get a small feeling for it

anybody know the worst loosing streak? Is there more then 32?`thx for help

Longest losing streak that I know of at x2 was 32 or 33. There was a winning streak at x2 of 34 I think. But know that when you're dealing with random numbers, there is no maximum losing streak. You CAN lose all of your bets you ever place at x2. Don't bargain on a losing streak of 34 ending in a win.

Maybe you take a look on a old thread from me here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1417931.msg14362394#msg14362394

[houseworx]

anybody know the worst loosing streak? Is there more then 32?`thx for help

maximum what you can get in row on 49.50%(2x payout with 1% HE) is something around +/- 35

but heard only about same 32-33!

[HCP]

maximum what you can get expect in row on 49.50%(2x payout with 1% HE) is something around +/- 35

There... fixed that for you.

Theoretically, the maximum number of losses in a row that you can get is infinite. Given each "roll" is independent from any prior rolls... your chance is still 49.5% every roll. I'm sure there will be someone that will one day break all known "records" and get some ridiculous run of like 50 losses.

[houseworx]

maximum what you can get expect in row on 49.50%(2x payout with 1% HE) is something around +/- 35

There... fixed that for you.

Theoretically, the maximum number of losses in a row that you can get is infinite. Given each "roll" is independent from any prior rolls... your chance is still 49.5% every roll. I'm sure there will be someone that will one day break all known "records" and get some ridiculous run of like 50 losses.

RNG have "memory" thats why you have near 100% correct "luck" numbers after X bets on X fixed winning chance %. each play percentage has own maximum possibility deviations from the norm.

thats why you can't get 100 reds in row on 49.50%, but can get 1500 reds in row on 1%


how long time dice game is in industry? 4-5 years? (i dont know) ask yourself why there is no fixed proof about someone who was get 35+ streak on that 2x payout(with 1% HE and trusted site) after that kind of time? because no one had it.

i can write every forum, and tell that i was get 60reds in row, and from this moment all will trust that is a "Record"? I even can make screenshot in photoshop, and? its stupid to trust every thing what you can read somewhere

[BreachOfEuphoria]

Hi seuntjie !

Thank you making this bot. I have allready thanked you twice but i guess it never hurts.
I will donate to you if i make any money.

I have had this bug where bets made does not show the last zero(es).
Maybe it's not a bug and the zeroes are left out because they are irrelevant ?
I'm making this post because my brain needs to take a 160 satoshi bet more serious than a 16 satoshi bet. Exponential growth is no joke and if running wild it will bust my bankroll  

I've tried different versions and it does it in all versions.
It does not show the 0 if the bet ends in 0. It DOES show all other zeroes.

I made a screenshot to show you what i'm talking about:

https://ibb.co/c3Avpn

[HCP]

I have had this bug where bets made does not show the last zero(es).
Maybe it's not a bug and the zeroes are left out because they are irrelevant ?
I'm making this post because my brain needs to take a 160 satoshi bet more serious than a 16 satoshi bet. Exponential growth is no joke and if running wild it will bust my bankroll 

It's not a bug... it's like you said, the bot doesn't show the "irrelevant" zeros.

There isn't a way to change this behaviour without modifying the code to display to a specific number of decimal places... but the trick there is that not ALL currencies use 8 decimal places like BTC... and not all betting sites actually allow you to bet that small anyway.

[veleten]

maximum what you can get expect in row on 49.50%(2x payout with 1% HE) is something around +/- 35

There... fixed that for you.

Theoretically, the maximum number of losses in a row that you can get is infinite. Given each "roll" is independent from any prior rolls... your chance is still 49.5% every roll. I'm sure there will be someone that will one day break all known "records" and get some ridiculous run of like 50 losses.

RNG have "memory" thats why you have near 100% correct "luck" numbers after X bets on X fixed winning chance %. each play percentage has own maximum possibility deviations from the norm.

thats why you can't get 100 reds in row on 49.50%, but can get 1500 reds in row on 1%


how long time dice game is in industry? 4-5 years? (i dont know) ask yourself why there is no fixed proof about someone who was get 35+ streak on that 2x payout(with 1% HE and trusted site) after that kind of time? because no one had it.

i can write every forum, and tell that i was get 60reds in row, and from this moment all will trust that is a "Record"? I even can make screenshot in photoshop, and? its stupid to trust every thing what you can read somewhere

RNG have memory how?
every roll is independent,at least if the provably fair implmentation is correct and the game is not rigged
theoretically if a million monkeys type on million pc's for infinite time,you can get 100 reds in a row,no problem,the only thing is when
also you can get much more than 1500 reds on 1%,I use the rule of 13x thumbs to simplify
its 13x your multiplier,starting from 2x to determine the minimum amount of reds you should be able to cover with your bank for a relatively safe martingale
p.s. I had 27 reds on 2x,but you won't trust me of course