Is product important for a project?

[lushlife]

Of course, if the product is useless then it is natural that it will be
cheap, on the contrary, if the product is useful then the price will
skyrocket.

[1714746252]

1714746252

[1714746252]

1714746252

[1714746252]

1714746252

[1714746252]

1714746252

[1714746252]

1714746252

[1714746252]

1714746252

[Afteryou56]

Of course, the product is a testament to the reality of the project. There needs to be some proof that the developers are competent enough to create a working product and are not here to just make some quick buck.

[Nivia1st]

product is very important. without a product, the project is only scam. and the product becomes a benchmark for seeing a good project or not. and a successful project is a project whose platform or product can be used by everyone.

[Cactushrt]

It's important but most ICO dont have a working product they will try to collect funds for the product butsome successfull ICO can't deliver product on time.

[bunmilove]

Yes Product is very important for a project because with this they will be able to get good number of investors around the world.

[cryptodammy]

Why some project fail to do well after their listing is because they have no real product and also no valid mission and vission .... I think a project need all this to strive

[Vargum]

Guys, how do you think, is a ready-made product important for ICO project?

In my opinion, it is, because it can show investors that the team is ready to bring huge results and has future plans.

As an example - KickCity, event platform where each user is rewarded for event promotion. You can try it today. More information you can find here  https://medium.com/@kickcity_io/kickcity-public-beta-5aa66fafc5c7

The availability of the finished product plays an important role in the success of the ICO. This is important for investors and can also be useful for people in certain areas of life.

[bagikoin]

the product will give you an idea of how the project featuring the running and its potential. of course, it will be an important consideration for investors to enter in it or not. If the product is good of course will be a lot of support and can be in accordance with expectations. But if the product already looks bad so don't expect investors could be interested in it.

[jepoyr1]

Yes product is more important than others because product is the one who represent the project. If the product is not good there is no one will try to invest in project.

[Nicolas Bebek]

I myself as a bounty hunter, I judge that the product it is very important for the bounty hunter. Because of the existence of this product then we know that the project is good or not. So it was more convincing to investors.

[liashouy]

Important, products are the most important investment to attract people. If there is no product, why should I trust your project?

[ka4ok1331]

As for me, the product is extremely important. If there is no product but just words, I try to stay away of such projects. But Sometimes I make exceptions. It depends also on the team and whitepaper

[goddess116]

It is very important that if a coin has a landing project, it is more popular by investors. Because if one project has product, at least the team of the project have made their effort.

[cizatext]

Well it depends on the developers if there have an existing product I think it will serve as a road map to guide and educate the investors about what the product can do, most especially if it an utility product, with an existing product it will be easy to be test run and worked on in other to fine it lapses a d corrections will be made.

[Psynthax]

As for me, the product is extremely important. If there is no product but just words, I try to stay away of such projects. But Sometimes I make exceptions. It depends also on the team and whitepaper

But the project that do ICO usually have an unfinished project, the main point of why they are raising funds is to develop their promised project into reality and therefore it requires money and support from the community.
We can't judge that a project is bad because it dont have project but I can't argue that a project with product is more trustworthy.

[lobo13hf]

my personal opinion is that a good ISO must have an initial version of the working product. Without a product, these are the air locks of the project organizers, nothing more. In 80% of cases, they do not even know how to implement their idea in technical terms and collect money simply for an idea.

As for me its not even necessary that an ICO has initially a working product because what matters most is the legitimacy of an ICO and its kind of product that people used an applied for their daily living that can make life at ease, because there are product that highly technical and futuristic but people hard to adapt because of the current situation and not massively applicable.

That team is forgetting to create such a product that user friendly and easy to be used by everyone. AFAIK you can try to see that product of buddy project and a lot of people have been used it and there was no a lot of problems have discovered by the team. Only thinking about the product without consider about how it can be adopted by the users and it's a big fail.

[Sandeep24]

Of course yes, if product is good then project will automatically popular in the public. I think 99% people are investing in the project on the basis of product. It means product can be play good role for success of any company or project in ICO market.

[ximabe]

Truly, item is of most extreme significance with regards to putting into any crypto venture. One of the first and main consideration I consider before putting or taking an interest in any undertaking, is the item.. A venture with a decent item, will offer in the wake of being recorded on trade and most undertakings like this, tend to rise and offer with great benefit.

[sebastianweyer655@gmail.c]

Ofcourse, a lot of the ICOs stating they have working products seem to be failed products though, I'd rather have a project with good looking product not released yet than a failure.

[Goldendragon67]

I'm trying to bypass projects that don't have their own product or an already established community that will 100% support it.