|
dillpicklechips
|
 |
March 16, 2018, 10:47:53 AM |
|
1. The process of sending merit seems a bit annoying. You've to go through another web-page and select number of merit to be sent and then send it. IMO, it'd be better if it could be sent just by clicking "+Merit" button right within the thread.
2. It'd be much better if you guys allow only one merit by the merit-sender per post. This will reduce fake-merit-exchange or fake-merit-giving. There're people sending tens of their merits to a single post which clearly seems like something fishy.
Yeah, there should be a way to give merit without leaving the page. Maybe clicking it multiple times moves the merit up by one each time. I disagree about only allowing one merit per post though as a person writing a very detailed and constructive guide probably deserves more merit than just someone who makes a short but informative post. Besides, it's probably easy to spot abuses when people are giving a shit load of merit out for posts that probably don't really deserve it. This. @hilariousetc's modified suggestion of the OP should be heard and read. Hey OP, edit your post and add this there so in case theymos would go here in the Meta and would read the topic then he can see this right away.
I'm not really annoyed that much with another window popping up when giving merits but this would be convenient if implemented. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you see garbage posts (off-topic, trolling, spam, no point, etc.), use the "report to moderator" links. All reports are investigated, though you will rarely be contacted about your reports.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
Jet Cash
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2702
Merit: 2456
https://JetCash.com
|
|
March 16, 2018, 10:49:08 AM |
|
Merits are not renewable at a level. If you exhaust your merits on one post, you cannot reward again if you are still on the same level.
Also with exception of Jr member, no single person has enough merit points to effect a rank up. So giving more merits score to one post is harmful.
I think the forum worked on this merit system very well taken into consideration most of these fears.
That isn't true. Leaving aside the merit sources, sMerits are generated as a result of members being awarded merits. I haven't changed levels, but I must have given away getting on for 200 sMerits. |
Offgrid campers allow you to enjoy life and preserve your health and wealth. Save old Cars - my project to save old cars from scrapage schemes, and to reduce the sale of new cars. My new Bitcoin transfer address is - bc1q9gtz8e40en6glgxwk4eujuau2fk5wxrprs6fys |
|
|
|
TheQuin
|
|
March 16, 2018, 12:21:43 PM |
|
We've got some excellent technical posters here. I'd like to see an expansion in the macro-economic discussions as well, but any such thread seems to be overrun with low level posting. We are going through some massive changes at the moment - the recent announcement by Google is just one example of this. I think I'm going to discout all of the discussions on the merit system, and try to encorage quality posting about the effects of Bitcoin and crypto in the world economy.
When it comes to the frog pond and economics boards the only way to have decent thread is to start it yourself and make it self-moderated. Even then it will get overrun with shitposts while you're asleep. |
|
|
|
MoonJeina
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 652
Merit: 250
Make winning bets on sports with Sportsbet.io!
|
|
March 16, 2018, 01:20:22 PM |
|
1. The process of sending merit seems a bit annoying. You've to go through another web-page and select number of merit to be sent and then send it. IMO, it'd be better if it could be sent just by clicking "+Merit" button right within the thread.
2. It'd be much better if you guys allow only one merit by the merit-sender per post. This will reduce fake-merit-exchange or fake-merit-giving. There're people sending tens of their merits to a single post which clearly seems like something fishy.
It is really true that the purpose for which merit system was introduced is not being fulfilled completely . It seems like the users always find some way or another to benefit themselves . Many of the users are giving merits to their other accounts and just trading it to upgrade their accounts and rank . I have seen many users giving 20-30 merits to one some accounts for just one post . Also the new window opened by merit is not a very good interface , so making it "only one " merit will be a better option . |
|
|
|
|
vlad230
|
|
March 16, 2018, 01:49:22 PM |
|
1. The process of sending merit seems a bit annoying. You've to go through another web-page and select number of merit to be sent and then send it. IMO, it'd be better if it could be sent just by clicking "+Merit" button right within the thread.
2. It'd be much better if you guys allow only one merit by the merit-sender per post. This will reduce fake-merit-exchange or fake-merit-giving. There're people sending tens of their merits to a single post which clearly seems like something fishy.
I agree with #1, we need an easier way to send merit. Preferably on the same page and without any third party scripts. I think that #2 is not really good since a post may deserve more merits than the other and the abusers would still be able to go around it by sending it to multiple posts. The current system seems to work for me, and it avoids making merit awards accidentally,
I agree that the max award should be reduced. I suggested a max of 2 per post per member.
A max of two merits per post would still be a bit drastic. I would propose using 5 as a max. I remember a lot of websites used to have the "5 star" rating of something in place at some point (and I think many still have it). So, this way you could send 1 merit if the post is decent and 5 merits if the posts is excellent. |
|
|
|
|
Emilyearl
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 700
Merit: 105
APESWAP
|
|
March 16, 2018, 07:47:15 PM |
|
Your suggestions are cool especially the first one. It's somewhat tiring having to go through another website before merits can be given. If they can just do it to be like facebook or Ingram like which is one just a click it will be better. To me, I think there should be no limitationas to how many merits can be given per post. It should be open and people can give as they want based on how moved they were or how insightful the post merited
|
|
|
|
|
malikusama
Copper Member
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 294
|
|
March 17, 2018, 04:46:30 AM |
|
Indeed it is annoying, there should be a small tab instead of a whole new window to send merits. "Merit" are used to rate the post according to the efforts of user, this will be quite unfair if you want to keep a good, very good and excellent post on the same level. This will reduce fake-merit-exchange or fake-merit-giving.
It will not reduce fake-merit exchange, however it will decrease the impact of merit system on the forum. Merit system is useless if it will be treated as "Like" button. |
|
|
|
|
|
nevergone
|
|
March 17, 2018, 05:04:11 AM |
|
merit is not a good way to handle with the problems that shall be solved, it just simply will cause another question and do nothing help to reduce the scam posts, because there are many high rank members post scams to hunt bounties
|
|
|
|
|
jemarleon
Member
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 13
Silence
|
|
March 17, 2018, 05:06:49 AM |
|
1. The process of sending merit seems a bit annoying. You've to go through another web-page and select number of merit to be sent and then send it. IMO, it'd be better if it could be sent just by clicking "+Merit" button right within the thread.
This will increase the chance of double sending merits. I think its good idea if there is a confirmation first before sending. 2. It'd be much better if you guys allow only one merit by the merit-sender per post. This will reduce fake-merit-exchange or fake-merit-giving. There're people sending tens of their merits to a single post which clearly seems like something fishy.
For me it is not suspicious if they send 10 to a high quality content some sends 20 but if its reasonable I dont find it suspicious, and if they change the rules of merit system to this maybe we cant identify now who abuses the system. |
|
|
|
|
|
krishnaverma
|
|
March 17, 2018, 11:14:35 AM |
|
merit is not a good way to handle with the problems that shall be solved, it just simply will cause another question and do nothing help to reduce the scam posts, because there are many high rank members post scams to hunt bounties
Merit is of course helping the forum in a number of ways. New members are making a lot of constructive posts and in many cases they are leaving even senior members behind in terms of getting merits. Regarding senior ranks still making useless posts for bounties, this is true only for some members. However, we are seeing initiatives taken by campaign managers where they are giving more pay to members having some earned merits for all ranks. |
|
|
|
|
Mpamaegbu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1208
Once a man, twice a child!
|
|
March 17, 2018, 12:41:41 PM |
|
1. The process of sending merit seems a bit annoying. You've to go through another web-page and select number of merit to be sent and then send it.
I tend to see the good in letting the click go to another page where the sender's merit stock is displayed. If we want it to remain on same page, will it still display what sMerit the sender has before sending out? I agree that the max award should be reduced. I suggested a max of 2 per post per member.
Having a limitation of 2 merit per post no matter how good and mellifluous the constructiveness of the post is will take away the reward for in-depth response and analysis. It will contra-work with the aim of the Merit system which is to up constructive posting. We shouldn't be stingy about this thing. It's not like it is sending $$ to a live account. It is just an encouragement mechanism. |
|
|
|
Aikidoka
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 342
Sinbad Mixer: Mix Your BTC Quickly
|
|
March 17, 2018, 01:35:56 PM |
|
I do not know how it is annoying for you that another page opens up. I mean if you also want to post a thread or comment on another one, you will go through the same process. It is just one page that contains how many merit points you have. And as for the second suggestion, there are many interesting posts that cannot be rewarded with only one merit point. Sometimes, equality is unfair if you ask me.
|
|
|
|
|
BTCeminjas
Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 23
|
|
March 17, 2018, 01:56:53 PM |
|
I do not know how it is annoying for you that another page opens up. I mean if you also want to post a thread or comment on another one, you will go through the same process. It is just one page that contains how many merit points you have. And as for the second suggestion, there are many interesting posts that cannot be rewarded with only one merit point. Sometimes, equality is unfair if you ask me.
Yes, I agree with you mate. Sometimes there is a post that deserving to have not only 1 smerit, but I think they have set a limitation on giving smerit a maximum of five smerits in a single post is probably fair for those having effort of the good quality post or reporting someone cheated in this forum. I have also noticed that equality is unfair on this forum or having biased. |
|
|
|
|
knightmairesaint
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 490
Merit: 262
privacy preserving smart contracts and beyond
|
|
March 17, 2018, 02:25:50 PM |
|
1. The process of sending merit seems a bit annoying. You've to go through another web-page and select number of merit to be sent and then send it. IMO, it'd be better if it could be sent just by clicking "+Merit" button right within the thread.
2. It'd be much better if you guys allow only one merit by the merit-sender per post. This will reduce fake-merit-exchange or fake-merit-giving. There're people sending tens of their merits to a single post which clearly seems like something fishy.
I agree to #1 But disagree to #2. What if a post is really good and you feel like you want to award more than one merit? I feel like posts should receive an equal amount of merits as how good that post is. We're opposite. In #1, I don't think it's necessary to change the system on how you send a merit because redirecting to another web page is not a hassle at all (maybe it does if you have a slow internet connection). In #2, Actually, giving couple of smerits is not bad because the more smerits you send only implicates that you more appreciate one's post. But what happening right now is many members of this forum use this as a gateway for the benefit of their own that's why I also agree in "1 merit per post" somehow. |
|
|
|
Jet Cash
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2702
Merit: 2456
https://JetCash.com
|
|
March 17, 2018, 02:50:55 PM |
|
Having a limitation of 2 merit per post no matter how good and mellifluous the constructiveness of the post is will take away the reward for in-depth response and analysis. It will contra-work with the aim of the Merit system which is to up constructive posting. We shouldn't be stingy about this thing. It's not like it is sending $$ to a live account. It is just an encouragement mechanism.
If it is that good, then it will receive merits from more than one source. Having a maximum for individual rewards slightly reduces the probability of abuses in my opinion. |
Offgrid campers allow you to enjoy life and preserve your health and wealth. Save old Cars - my project to save old cars from scrapage schemes, and to reduce the sale of new cars. My new Bitcoin transfer address is - bc1q9gtz8e40en6glgxwk4eujuau2fk5wxrprs6fys |
|
|
iqlimasyadiqa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
|
|
March 17, 2018, 03:33:10 PM |
|
1. The process of sending merit seems a bit annoying. You've to go through another web-page and select number of merit to be sent and then send it. IMO, it'd be better if it could be sent just by clicking "+Merit" button right within the thread.
2. It'd be much better if you guys allow only one merit by the merit-sender per post. This will reduce fake-merit-exchange or fake-merit-giving. There're people sending tens of their merits to a single post which clearly seems like something fishy.
For option number one I do not agree because if implemented in accordance with point 1 then it will be able to generate errors like wrong clicks, for me the current condition is to reduce errors because the system is like a confirmation that states that we will send merit or not. For the second point I quite agree because then we can reduce the risk of cheating that can happen, so the point merit sent only 1 and can not be more. It will make someone have the same opportunity to get merit because Smerit owned by someone is not easy to run out. Overall we are still in the development stage of the application of the current merit system, for me this is good enough and we have to wait some time ahead to see the results. In fact we can already see the reduced spammers and scammers, but we also have to look at the data and also see what will happen. The final analysis will determine how successful the implementation of this merit system is and if necessary it may be an update and also a new regulation in the very necessary to improve this system. I and we all support the enactment of this system and this is a way to get a much better change for the development of the Bitcointalk.org forum. |
|
|
|
|
coloseum
Member
Offline
Activity: 219
Merit: 10
|
|
March 17, 2018, 04:10:32 PM |
|
Merit is of course helping the forum in a number of ways. New members are making a lot of constructive posts and in many cases they are leaving even senior members behind in terms of getting merits. Regarding senior ranks still making useless posts for bounties, this is true only for some members. However, we are seeing initiatives taken by campaign managers where they are giving more pay to members having some earned merits for all ranks.
I don't deny the fact that merit system has contributed positive effects to the forum over 2 months after its launch. The system should keep continuing its operations this way. However, I have a doubt that newcomers who can contribute high quality posts come from alt accounts of Hero/ Ledgandary  |
|
|
|
|
|
