Omikifuse
Legendary
 Online
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1009
|
 |
November 10, 2013, 09:20:46 AM |
|
R9 280x is way cooler... lets just wait for the new chip....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally
controlled
networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem
to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
mzahor
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
November 10, 2013, 02:54:54 PM |
|
I have R9 280X and also 7970 OC and 7970 GHZ [ all from Gigabyte ]
R9 280X "OC" 729kH/s
7970OC/GHZ 764kH/s
|
|
|
|
|
winner999
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
November 10, 2013, 03:21:11 PM |
|
I presume all with same sittings?
|
|
|
|
|
mzahor
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
November 10, 2013, 03:25:00 PM |
|
No,
R9 280X 1038 / 1500
7970 1085 / 1500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gumbork
|
|
November 11, 2013, 02:29:48 AM |
|
I have R9 280X and also 7970 OC and 7970 GHZ [ all from Gigabyte ]
R9 280X "OC" 729kH/s
7970OC/GHZ 764kH/s
Nice hash you have there... But I hate gigabyte cause its voltage locked... |
|
|
|
|
stefffe
|
|
November 11, 2013, 07:44:41 AM |
|
I have R9 280X and also 7970 OC and 7970 GHZ [ all from Gigabyte ]
R9 280X "OC" 729kH/s
7970OC/GHZ 764kH/s
I have Gigabyte R9 280x "oc" and I cant get anything higher than 610... Would you mind sending your settings to me? |
|
|
|
junshong
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 192
Merit: 100
Hi!
|
|
November 11, 2013, 12:17:28 PM |
|
Don't buy either R9 280x or HD 7970. ASIC for scrypt is coming.... you would have big problem then...
Doubt it would be soon. Requires so much memory, pretty hard to make even one. Even if they make one, it would be expensive |
|
|
|
|
Thenen
|
|
November 11, 2013, 03:41:02 PM |
|
Don't buy either R9 280x or HD 7970. ASIC for scrypt is coming.... you would have big problem then...
Doubt it would be soon. Requires so much memory, pretty hard to make even one. Even if they make one, it would be expensive Erm, the price would be expensive at first but it usually drop pretty fast in few months time.. |
|
|
|
|
|
rampalija
|
|
November 11, 2013, 11:34:06 PM |
|
7950 BUT only if it has dual fans, dont use MSI single fan
|
|
|
|
AvalonMiner
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
November 11, 2013, 11:51:39 PM |
|
Since they are both similar if you will also be using for for gaming I would buy the R9 280X since it supports DirectX 11.2 and also make sure to get one with a nice cooler such a gigabyte or msi card.
|
|
|
|
|
|
rampalija
|
|
November 12, 2013, 08:14:51 AM |
|
Since they are both similar if you will also be using for for gaming I would buy the R9 280X since it supports DirectX 11.2 and also make sure to get one with a nice cooler such a gigabyte or msi card.
7970, is cheaper and same shit you get from them |
|
|
|
|
wunkbone
|
|
November 12, 2013, 12:43:31 PM |
|
Since they are both similar if you will also be using for for gaming I would buy the R9 280X since it supports DirectX 11.2 and also make sure to get one with a nice cooler such a gigabyte or msi card.
7970, is cheaper and same shit you get from them But R9 280x new chip is coming.. who knows it might be much better |
|
|
|
|
rampalija
|
|
November 12, 2013, 11:09:54 PM |
|
Since they are both similar if you will also be using for for gaming I would buy the R9 280X since it supports DirectX 11.2 and also make sure to get one with a nice cooler such a gigabyte or msi card.
7970, is cheaper and same shit you get from them But R9 280x new chip is coming.. who knows it might be much better coming, but now 7970 are better |
|
|
|
|
Sythyn
|
|
November 13, 2013, 01:30:02 AM |
|
Since they are both similar if you will also be using for for gaming I would buy the R9 280X since it supports DirectX 11.2 and also make sure to get one with a nice cooler such a gigabyte or msi card.
7970, is cheaper and same shit you get from them But R9 280x new chip is coming.. who knows it might be much better coming, but now 7970 are better This is a long term mining so better wait few weeks for a better one  |
|
|
|
|
|
johncarpe64
|
|
November 13, 2013, 02:23:45 AM |
|
I am waiting for the new chip also...
|
|
|
|
|
|
johncarpe64
|
|
November 13, 2013, 12:48:56 PM |
|
Anybody have any news about the new chip that everyone is talking about?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beans
|
|
November 13, 2013, 12:53:14 PM |
|
I have a Gigabyte 280x and the max I can get is 640/Kh.
With --shaders 2048 --thread-concurrency 8192 -g 2 -w 256 -I 13
1100 clock
1500 memory
I only get 596/Kh
|
|
|
|
|
SquallLeonhart
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1101
|
|
November 13, 2013, 02:04:01 PM |
|
I have a Gigabyte 280x and the max I can get is 640/Kh.
With --shaders 2048 --thread-concurrency 8192 -g 2 -w 256 -I 13
1100 clock
1500 memory
I only get 596/Kh
Try lowering your overclock and changing your thread concurrency.. 640/Kh is not optimum yet... |
|
|
|
|
|
rampalija
|
|
November 13, 2013, 10:26:06 PM |
|
I have a Gigabyte 280x and the max I can get is 640/Kh.
With --shaders 2048 --thread-concurrency 8192 -g 2 -w 256 -I 13
1100 clock
1500 memory
I only get 596/Kh
shaders are not so important, try change you difficulti to 16384 |
|
|
|
|
Beans
|
|
November 14, 2013, 12:56:29 AM |
|
I have a Gigabyte 280x and the max I can get is 640/Kh.
With --shaders 2048 --thread-concurrency 8192 -g 2 -w 256 -I 13
1100 clock
1500 memory
I only get 596/Kh
Try lowering your overclock and changing your thread concurrency.. 640/Kh is not optimum yet... I only reached 640/Kh with --thread-concurrency 16384 -I 20 |
|
|
|
|
|
