EDIT: OMG HUGE Merit Farming (3rd list updated)

[goku1525]

These judgement to other people will only give them heartache.

Then I consider that a feedback well-given.

Thank you for the consideration. I was thinking if these people being tagged has the right to give there merits whenever and to whoever they want to give it. I am in a neutral side here, but I also want a fair and just decision coming from you with your conscience to whether or not you can hurt the feelings of those affected in this report.

You deserve to have a merit with me because I do appreciate people like you whose being concerned with those people who's been tagged. It really breaks my heart to see my account having a red tag just because I was

Engaged in an obvious merit trade with thend1949. Don't trust this guy.

according to The Pharmacist. As what I have known, there is no limitation in sending and receiving merit. Receiving a high a merit is not abusing thing for me, except if they keep on sending high merit in that particular account, then that's the time you can say that you're abusing the merit. I respect what The Pharmacist did, but I am hoping for a consideration coz I really don't want to see a red tag in my account. I'm really trying my best just to have a quality post and having a red tag makes me feel so down.


To you bwonwen2015, you should stop being sycophantic with the DT MEMBERS. Stop doing this just to gain popularity and good reputation. You should be the one who deserve to have a red tag coz you're just one of those shitty poster here in this forum. You feel so proud on what you have done. Yet, you don't have time to look the way you post. I guess DT MEMBERS should take a look at his profile and see how this guy post. If you want to help in this forum, better look for another way.

[coinlocket$]

@ThePharmachist, missing some accounts

posted long time ago

DETECTIVE TIME
TASK

I don't know, maybe I'm wrong, but for the post to earn 50 merit (from one person) would require that post to seriously be up to that standard and I don't think posts like these deserve it.

Chachacoin17, both posts but different topics. Merited by: -thend1949(50)  on February 07, 2018, -marcuslong(50) on February 08, 2018

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2671353.msg29817854#msg29817854
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2902381.msg29852678#msg29852678


on the side note, Chachacoin17 goit merited for 50 merit 3 times on the same day. His merit history.

TARGET= Chachacoin17

This is his ethscan for sal tokens
He probably using more accounts to farm signatures, how can I tell this? look timestamp when he sent tokens to fake address, to send again on main address

https://etherscan.io/address/0xc1346eb12de99ab7b027df5fc49d500f33852091#tokentxns


Quite cleaver but not enought he passes tokens to another address, before passing again on this main before selling on ehterdelta

But the Sal spreadsheet is here  
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16RzF474h6F-8XpHf89aENRgDgb5--tIwl5GkUkbPwig/edit#gid=1369555539

RELATED ACCOUNT 1
https://etherscan.io/address/0x5c4e9401aa93a0b73a041ddee687a3129205bf2e#tokentxns FROM
https://etherscan.io/address/0x0c41cb2ec80cb990a1155e29b56db467f545e3a1#tokentxns
12/13/2017 18:58:57   @rushel22   rushel22   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1097488   Full Member   135   0x0c41cB2eC80CB990A1155e29b56db467F545E3a1   60   60   0   60   120   93,150   717.9190751
https://puu.sh/zxcIq/9b6761aebc.png

RELATED ACCOUNT 2
https://etherscan.io/address/0xec00af698fa5ff389ba94c40bffcbdff9a1bd8f8#tokentxns FROM
https://etherscan.io/address/0x142bc2bd99f972d35504c85d6bf9e45d2d5255a5#tokentxns
12/12/2017 19:44:11    @cryptojac17   cryptojac17   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1040042   Full Member   265   0x142Bc2BD99F972d35504C85D6bF9e45D2d5255a5   60   60   60   60   180   93,150   1076.878613
https://puu.sh/zxcJD/e92469455e.png

RELATED ACCOUNT 3
https://etherscan.io/address/0x12ca9bc11037fd053ccff0380ca5ad824715758e#tokentxns FROM
https://etherscan.io/address/0xfee66d2e1622717db6499cb1350dc98b5d578fe8#tokentxns
12/13/2017 0:08:17   @btcjocan   btcjocan   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=967100   Senior Member   460   0xFEe66D2e1622717Db6499CB1350DC98B5D578fe8   80   80   80   80   240   93,150   1435.83815
https://puu.sh/zxcKG/ade058701f.png

RELATED ACCOUNT 4
https://etherscan.io/address/0xe263e440324014791c3fb4e05e716117a893dfd3#tokentxns FROM
https://etherscan.io/address/0x10d96cad952891f2f838b30bfcf91981e1cb80f5#tokentxns
12/12/2017 7:23:42    @thend1949   thend1949   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=773000   Hero/Legendary   871   0x10d96Cad952891F2f838B30Bfcf91981E1cb80f5   100   100   100   100   300   93,150   1794.797688

Here we go. 50 merit links address/accounts

editing in progress let me see if i can find others alts

Same thing for specrtre-u tokens
Spreadsheet here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aOKDlEvIFd8nvJ-1tvJDAHBU-2FDuKfk-MP53bY7iEQ/edit#gid=251980404

NVM
got the second links/alt trade merit
https://etherscan.io/address/0x9ba1ca71d5ab9b8360ce5b6b631cb21940361960#tokentxns FROM
https://etherscan.io/address/0x13aa508b5f1717c67dfb949f27102c00fb115873#tokentxns
03/10/17 23:59:08   chickenado   Hero Member   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1779    https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2199275.msg22532005#msg22532005   541      0x13aA508b5F1717C67dfB949F27102c00FB115873   5340   11866,66667

let's find last one
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=226950 marcuslong(50)
https://etherscan.io/address/0x1decCA6331875F664689F628bA34B30e784365ba#tokentxns
Last account is not address related, seems stop working on bounty for 4 mounts but now is active on signature


let's now find merit trading for alts

Merit summary for btcjocan

Merit: 250
Sent in the last 120 days

    February 06, 2018, 07:00:15 PM: 20 to Twinscoin2017 for Re: Too late for Bitcoin?
Merit summary for chickenado

Merit: 500
Sent in the last 120 days

    February 09, 2018, 07:23:07 PM: 50 to Chachacoin17 for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
    January 31, 2018, 02:01:09 PM: 30 to Twinscoin2017 for Re: What would happen to BTC if internet was turned off?

very strange let's check https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1093001 Twinscoin2017
Sent in the last 120 days

    February 15, 2018, 05:35:29 AM: 40 to chikading2016 for Re: How can we help bitcoin grow?
    February 13, 2018, 10:04:20 PM: 20 to soenaderecho10 for Re: Does Bitcoin have a future?
    February 05, 2018, 05:45:52 AM: 50 to Ronaldcoin2017 for Re: why do people agree to pay taxes?

Received in the last 120 days

    February 06, 2018, 07:00:15 PM: 20 from btcjocan for Re: Too late for Bitcoin?
    February 05, 2018, 05:37:31 AM: 20 from MiF for Re: time to buy bitcoin
    February 03, 2018, 03:00:10 AM: 20 from Clavulanic for Re: Holding will be a risk or not??
    January 31, 2018, 02:01:09 PM: 30 from chickenado for Re: What would happen to BTC if internet was turned off?
    January 31, 2018, 01:40:23 PM: 50 from KenChanYu for Re: what is the bitcoin for you? and how did he change your life?
    January 31, 2018, 01:30:50 PM: 50 from Gaff for Re: why bitcoin is profitable ?
    January 31, 2018, 01:22:21 PM: 22 from djgtr for Re: what is the bitcoin for you? and how did he change your life?

HUGE AMOUNTS

LET'S CHECK ADDRESS
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2761995.msg30310627#msg30310627
http://archive.is/B8sid
HARD to find ETH Address: 0x3fcfF5a67224114df34c62F1b712D103C391111b NO transictions but I REPORT the merit cause is strange
BITCOIN 3445LFUeiTXiKiaCh8BrH6sQLRXQ9yAnf8 https://blockchain.info/address/3445LFUeiTXiKiaCh8BrH6sQLRXQ9yAnf8
DEAD WAY, or almost too much time to control every address for every transactions
Reported for merit absing https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2896910.msg31227162#msg31227162

almost 2 hours spent for this report, imho a lot of accunts involved pls keep investigate it's bed time here

[bwonwen2015]

These judgement to other people will only give them heartache.

Then I consider that a feedback well-given.

Thank you for the consideration. I was thinking if these people being tagged has the right to give there merits whenever and to whoever they want to give it. I am in a neutral side here, but I also want a fair and just decision coming from you with your conscience to whether or not you can hurt the feelings of those affected in this report.

You deserve to have a merit with me because I do appreciate people like you whose being concerned with those people who's been tagged. It really breaks my heart to see my account having a red tag just because I was

Engaged in an obvious merit trade with thend1949. Don't trust this guy.

according to The Pharmacist. As what I have known, there is no limitation in sending and receiving merit. Receiving a high a merit is not abusing thing for me, except if they keep on sending high merit in that particular account, then that's the time you can say that you're abusing the merit. I respect what The Pharmacist did, but I am hoping for a consideration coz I really don't want to see a red tag in my account. I'm really trying my best just to have a quality post and having a red tag makes me feel so down.


To you bwonwen2015, you should stop being sycophantic with the DT MEMBERS. Stop doing this just to gain popularity and good reputation. You should be the one who deserve to have a red tag coz you're just one of those shitty poster here in this forum. You feel so proud on what you have done. Yet, you don't have time to look the way you post. I guess DT MEMBERS should take a look at his profile and see how this guy post. If you want to help in this forum, better look for another way.

Come on man take it easy why BUTTHURT?

you broke the forum rule that's why you gained red flag from Pharmacist that's it.

No hard feelings.

Little advice: making alt accounts is easy but maintaining your alt accounts need a special skill set that you don't have.

And I have enough money to lead my life, i am not here to earn money from this forum.

[bwonwen2015]

3rd list

miramare recived 50 merits from ekoja

post : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3136887.msg32970648#msg32970648

ekoja sent 9 merits to xlcus

post : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2704656.msg29219604#msg29219604

Merits traded between all 3 accounts

miramare : recived merits from ekoja and xlcus

ekoja : sent merits to xlcus and miramare

xlcus : sent and recived merits from ekoja and miramare

miramare : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=195021

xlcus : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=9106

ekoja : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=237257

please check thoroughly

i think all 3 accounts are connected.

[Husires]

will be happy if you add this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3000328.msg30852506#msg30852506

[muzica0519]

March 14, 2018, 02:26:21 PM: 40 from frankkkkkkk for Re: [ANN] [空投] Nevra (XEV)- 平等、自由、信任
March 14, 2018, 02:23:30 PM: 21 from xx63245613 for Re: [ANN] [空投] Nevra (XEV)- 平等、自由、信任
March 14, 2018, 02:20:48 PM: 39 from zrunfeng for Re: [ANN] [空投] Nevra (XEV)- 平等、自由、信任
February 24, 2018, 02:24:59 AM: 10 from frankkkkkkk for Re: [ANN] [DAG + Smart Contracts] Constellation | Horizontally Scalable Hylochain

Is really a meritable post? I mean Ann thread merited with over 50? Why nobody report this? I don't mean no harm to this but this is too much to be merited.



https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=974724

What do you think?

[chikading2016]

You know what?, because of what you've done now,you have caused us troubles, you gave changed our life life from full to nothingness. This forum is an opportunity to the poor people like us who think that this thing help them to lift up our life status but you turn it away . You crushed our dreams .
 We dont know that giving merits is a crime or what kind of accusation you say. But whatever that is,u dont have the right to crush our dreams.  But its all up to you. If you think you are helping us out for red trusting us, well, you are wrong .You are just helping us to have problems. You made us think that this opportunity will gonna vanish.
But Im still  hoping  you will give us second chance. And let this heart breaking issue go.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

But its all up to you.

Problem settled, then.  

You know, your hopes and dreams are causing this forum to be unreadable.  That's the entire point of my negative ratings for merit abuse and cheating bounties.  If it was legal here anymore, I'd tag you all for being the garbage-spewing shitposting, ignorant, illiterate, sub-primates that you are.  But since you blatantly abused the merit system for your own benefit, that'll just have to do.  

I suspect I'm not going to do much negging for merit abuse anymore, since QS linked that quote from Theymos in the thread I started in meta asking for advice.  It's clear he wants the merit thing to run its course and wants DT members to assume good faith.  But for the negs I've already left?  Fuck you and the horse you rode in on.  You're the worst form of toxic waste this forum needs to dispose of, and if that includes crushing your little dreams of shitposting riches, so be it.

Go get your merits in the local boards where you don't have to pretend you're writing something useful, and stay away from the rest of the forum.  Christ, being in a sig campaign is not a birthright for anyone here.  It's a privilege, a bonus, a gift for doing something we enjoy doing.  Nobody here owes you a living, especially when you people have proven to be untrustworthy scumbags.  That is all.

[bwonwen2015]

@ThePharmachist,

why you removed red trust from merit abusers?

I am just asking the reason.

[hugeblack]

snip

Because

I think that tagging may be appropriate in particularly obvious cases, or particularly egregious cases involving hundreds of merit points and several posts. But generally you should start out by assuming good faith, and only change that opinion as the evidence really piles up. Tagging someone immediately after an instance of apparently-inexplicable meriting is too trigger-happy IMO. Even if it is a case of illegitimate merit, even hundreds of illegitimate merit points are not much of a problem IMO, so you have to ask whether it's worthwhile to possibly make a mistake by tagging someone who is merely suspicious.

I still believe he can tag Twinscoin2017 and Ronaldcoin2017 safty. (send merit to alt account)

User Twinscoin2017 use 3445LFUeiTXiKiaCh8BrH6sQLRXQ9yAnf8 archive
User Ronaldcoin2017 use 3445LFUeiTXiKiaCh8BrH6sQLRXQ9yAnf8 archive

[coinlocket$]

I still believe he can tag Twinscoin2017 and Ronaldcoin2017 safty. (send merit to alt account)

User Twinscoin2017 use 3445LFUeiTXiKiaCh8BrH6sQLRXQ9yAnf8 archive
User Ronaldcoin2017 use 3445LFUeiTXiKiaCh8BrH6sQLRXQ9yAnf8 archive

It's not only merit.
They are all linked accounts with txid proven, abusers on signature campaings, posted time ago.
What are the odds, people linked with ETH are also linked months later for merit abusing?

All ETH transaction can be found here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3018656.msg31225355#msg31225355

Also if they post with the same address...