Cheating thru using dual of account in signature campaign

[ACVinegar]

- Must wear our signature code and avatar
- Do not post all 20 posts within a day or 2. You are supposed to spread out the posting across the whole week.
- No red trust score.
- No multiple accounts/farming accounts.
- If you leave half way, you will not get paid for that week.
- This signature campaign will last for 8 weeks.
Week 1 Mar 14 to Mar 20
Week 2 Mar 21 to Mar 27
Week 3 Mar 28 to Apr 3
Week 4 Apr 4 to Apr 10
Week 5 Apr 11 to Apr 17
Week 6 Apr 18 to Apr 24
Week 7 Apr 25 to May 1
Week 8 May 2 to May 8


You have to wear our signature code and avatar before applying.
- Fill this Google form : https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf3bnZnhXq2CBp-0ZeWV0-erltlwK9HbDMvwDW3o5L_UUm9bw/viewform

Rates, paid in tokens:
Legendary : $800/week
Hero : $600/week
Senior : $400/week
Full member : $200/week
 Member : $100/week
Jr. Member : $50/week

Limited to 10 participants/rank.

Check your weekly allocation here.
Fishcoin Signature Spreadsheet : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UZyiLnBHD605Fo1voSGS5qaacb1fxFjRO_2hJLGHC_s/edit?usp=sharing

That are the rules made by hua_hui but even him, he cannot followed their own rules. As per investigation Signature campaign manager hua_hui was join as participant of their own signature campaign named "[BOUNTY] 🐟🐟Fishcoin🐟🐟|Twitter Bounty|Attractive Signature Up to $800/week"

During investigation I was found two (2) cases of dual accounts are joining in the signature campaign, as proof I will attached the copy of spreadsheet including the link below:





Link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UZyiLnBHD605Fo1voSGS5qaacb1fxFjRO_2hJLGHC_s/edit#gid=1403601995

These are the support information for the regarding dual accounts applied in "[BOUNTY] 🐟🐟Fishcoin🐟🐟|Twitter Bounty|Attractive Signature Up to $800/week"


BlockFolksHQ - 0x5829AFDc06EA5de1364B3c43367562BA67ed83ad this account is alt account of hua_hui

Proof:

subodhmore123aqs - 0x0FFa2B4178d928AA9311d5a049cb1c6E256e1589 this account is alt account of misterbigg

Proof:

Their wallet address are the same in the photo I attached, be aware with them because they are a signature campaign cheater.

[1713398923]

1713398923

[1713398923]

1713398923

[1713398923]

1713398923

[KeithBeeCham]

Your evidences still don't enough to point out they're alt accounts cause there are a lot of stupid guys in this forum are trying to destroy other higher rank account by this way. Do you think a Legendary user in this forum would have a mistake like this? same ETH address in the same campaign? I don't think so. If these accounts give merit for each other, I can ensure that they are alts but for now, it's still not clearly.

[ACVinegar]

Your evidences still don't enough to point out they're alt accounts cause there are a lot of stupid guys in this forum are trying to destroy other higher rank account by this way. Do you think a Legendary user in this forum would have a mistake like this? same ETH address in the same campaign? I don't think so. If these accounts give merit for each other, I can ensure that they are alts but for now, it's still not clearly.

Why you cannot try to visit this link:

hua_hui

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aOKDlEvIFd8nvJ-1tvJDAHBU-2FDuKfk-MP53bY7iEQ/edit#gid=251980404

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2199275.msg23369370#msg23369370

misterbigg

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/187rOvYdoYKHHthcmzvrKcN2UQ5d9E2FU6sOO07ZC5GY/edit#gid=700361341

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2057194.msg22179816#msg22179816

I cannot destroy the reputation of those Legendary users because on the first time I saw it, I was shocked that's why I reviewed it clearly. Why do they need to sharing/exchanging their merits? that is not my basis boy. That proof is enough because no stupid users shared their wallet address to others.

[Blue Tyrant]

Do you think a Legendary user in this forum would have a mistake like this?

You're severely overestimating the average legendary. Legendary means you have been here for long not that you are a knowledgeable or whatever. I've seen newbies who know more and are smarter than your average purchased legendary signature campaign account.

. If these accounts give merit for each other, I can ensure that they are alts but for now, it's still not clearly.

That's not the only way alts are determined, there are many many ways to find alts, merits can be a hint but never definitive, friends meriting each other (despite how shady that is overall) is common, doesn't make them alts

Your evidences still don't enough to point out they're alt accounts cause there are a lot of stupid guys in this forum are trying to destroy other higher rank account by this way

Unless I misread the details, the accused alt of the campaign manager enter his own campaign? Did he not recognise his own address? It means either he sucks at his job as a campaign manager (he should be checking for duplicate addresses anyway), or he was alright with it since like he'll get paid for someone else posting thus he's not worthy of being hired either.

[KeithBeeCham]

Your evidences still don't enough to point out they're alt accounts cause there are a lot of stupid guys in this forum are trying to destroy other higher rank account by this way. Do you think a Legendary user in this forum would have a mistake like this? same ETH address in the same campaign? I don't think so. If these accounts give merit for each other, I can ensure that they are alts but for now, it's still not clearly.

Why you cannot try to visit this link:

hua_hui

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aOKDlEvIFd8nvJ-1tvJDAHBU-2FDuKfk-MP53bY7iEQ/edit#gid=251980404

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2199275.msg23369370#msg23369370

misterbigg

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/187rOvYdoYKHHthcmzvrKcN2UQ5d9E2FU6sOO07ZC5GY/edit#gid=700361341

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2057194.msg22179816#msg22179816

I cannot destroy the reputation of those Legendary users because on the first time I saw it, I was shocked that's why I reviewed it clearly. Why do they need to sharing/exchanging their merits? that is not my basis boy. That proof is enough because no stupid users shared their wallet address to others.

What you mean when you told me to check these links? What wrong if anyone share their ETH address? If you said that no stupid users shared their address to others, I think this forum is full of stupid guys cause it's just a normal thing when you share your wallet address to other people.

[KeithBeeCham]

Do you think a Legendary user in this forum would have a mistake like this?

You're severely overestimating the average legendary. Legendary means you have been here for long not that you are a knowledgeable or whatever. I've seen newbies who know more and are smarter than your average purchased legendary signature campaign account.

. If these accounts give merit for each other, I can ensure that they are alts but for now, it's still not clearly.

That's not the only way alts are determined, there are many many ways to find alts, merits can be a hint but never definitive, friends meriting each other (despite how shady that is overall) is common, doesn't make them alts

Your evidences still don't enough to point out they're alt accounts cause there are a lot of stupid guys in this forum are trying to destroy other higher rank account by this way

Unless I misread the details, the accused alt of the campaign manager enter his own campaign? Did he not recognise his own address? It means either he sucks at his job as a campaign manager (he should be checking for duplicate addresses anyway), or he was alright with it since like he'll get paid for someone else posting thus he's not worthy of being hired either.

Can you remember exactly your ETH address and recognise it when any other used your address to apply for any campaign? I can't, it's too difficult to me. It's a string of a lot of characters and I think very little member in here can do that. But I'm not sure if they're alt or not, let wait DT member take a look about this case.

[Blue Tyrant]

Can you remember exactly your ETH address and recognise it when any other used your address to apply for any campaign? I can't, it's too difficult to me. It's a string of a lot of characters and I think very little member in here can do that. But I'm not sure if they're alt or not, let wait DT member take a look about this case.

I can generally remember the start and end of it since I regularly check it when entering my address (I'm paranoid of giving the wrong address or getting affected by malware that changes your address to an address owned by the creator of said malware, it was an issue before I'm unsure if it still is a thing). Anyway even if I someone doesn't remember their address, I mentioned what the issue is. You clearly didn't read my reply so I'll quote it for you

It means either he sucks at his job as a campaign manager (he should be checking for duplicate addresses anyway)

Read:the part in bold; if people are entering your campaign with the SAME address then you should be disqualifying them. So is the campaign manager not even checking for duplicates? Is it that easy to alt in his campaign that you don't even need to use a different address, just use the same address and he won't care?

I still don't understand why you're so vehemently defending him 


PS: Keep single replies please, don't make multiple replies in a row with no one else commenting in between

[KeithBeeCham]

I still don't understand why you're so vehemently defending him  

I don't defend for him or anyone in this forum . I just need more evidence, these evidences still not enough for me to believe that they're alts and I think it's also not enough for all other DT member to tag these guys . That's all.

[ACVinegar]

What you mean when you told me to check these links? What wrong if anyone share their ETH address? If you said that no stupid users shared their address to others, I think this forum is full of stupid guys cause it's just a normal thing when you share your wallet address to other people.

Using of same address between original users and their alt accounts are allowed, but I think you cannot get my point in this findings. I post this lapses because both original accounts and alternative accounts are joining in one signature campaign which is prohibited. That is included to the rules and regulation made by the mods.

I still don't understand why you're so vehemently defending him 

I don't defend for him or anyone in this forum . I just need more evidence, these evidences still not enough for me to believe that they're alts and I think it's also not enough for all other DT member to tag these guys . That's all.

Evidence I shown in this posts are concrete and solid but if that is not enough for you I don't need to explain more. I do my part and only mods and DT can decide if they can accept the findings I shown.

Your evidences still don't enough to point out they're alt accounts cause there are a lot of stupid guys in this forum are trying to destroy other higher rank account by this way. Do you think a Legendary user in this forum would have a mistake like this?

My intention that's why I create this thread is not to destroy the reputation of higher rank like Legendary, all I want is to have fair and equal policy to everyone. It not means that they are in the higher rank they cannot followed the rules and regulations, instead they need to become good example to newly participants and to everyone.

[marlboroza]

Post is pretty messy. OP please read this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.0
So, hua-hai posted this address 0x5829AFDc06EA5de1364B3c43367562BA67ed83ad and the same address is in bounty spreadsheed used by user BlockFolks

And hua-hai used this address for his bounty 0x9B7B46e87708ab66ab917129FC109b5F9EA313f0 and the same address was used by user  lorylore here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2295801.msg24800083#msg24800083

#JOIN
Bitcointalk username: lorylore
Forum rank: Legendary
Posts count: 2745
ETH address: 0x9B7B46e87708ab66ab917129FC109b5F9EA313f0

But you will probably find better connection here:
https://etherscan.io/txs?a=0x9b7b46e87708ab66ab917129fc109b5f9ea313f0&p=4

and here:
https://etherscan.io/tokentxns?a=0x9b7b46e87708ab66ab917129fc109b5f9ea313f0&p=2
Didn't search further.
But this is probably just another coincidence in the sea of forums coincidences 

[hilariousetc]

I'd already made the connection between Lorrylore and hua_hui:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=239151 lorrylore
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=553644 namelessname
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=332981     hua_hui

hua_hui is also running the PolicyPal campaign but his alt lorylore is also on it as is his own account:



Which is against his own campaign terms:

Rules:

- No multiple accounts/farming accounts.

This is why there should be more scrutiny on random accounts becoming campaign managers because there far too much incompetence and shadiness going on with them. His campaigns should probably be looked into because I'm sure he's probably paying a load more of his alt accounts.

[ACVinegar]

I'd already made the connection between Lorrylore and hua_hui:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=239151 lorrylore
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=553644 namelessname
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=332981     hua_hui

hua_hui is also running the PolicyPal campaign but his alt lorylore is also on it as is his own account:



Which is against his own campaign terms:

Rules:

- No multiple accounts/farming accounts.

This is why there should be more scrutiny on random accounts becoming campaign managers because there far too much incompetence and shadiness going on with them. His campaigns should probably be looked into because I'm sure he's probably paying a load more of his alt accounts.

With you respect, I think they need to sanction them to scared those people who trying to cheat. Aside on that hua_hui was literary abuse their rank and position as campaign manager, not only once or twice. If they tolerate them, they continue make it again and again, or in worst many fraudsters were follow their steps.

[KeithBeeCham]

Your evidences still don't enough to point out they're alt accounts cause there are a lot of stupid guys in this forum are trying to destroy other higher rank account by this way. Do you think a Legendary user in this forum would have a mistake like this?

My intention that's why I create this thread is not to destroy the reputation of higher rank like Legendary, all I want is to have fair and equal policy to everyone. It not means that they are in the higher rank they cannot followed the rules and regulations, instead they need to become good example to newly participants and to everyone.

Of course, I didn't mean you create this topic to destroy these accounts, I'm also trying to find out cheater in this forum. I mean other lower rank accounts are trying to apply in the same bounty campaign with the same ETH address with other higher rank accounts did it. Don't worry, If hilarious confirmed that they're alts, I think no need to discuss about this case anymore ). Cause these alts account will be tagged soon.

[Maricel2017]

I'd already made the connection between Lorrylore and hua_hui:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=239151 lorrylore
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=553644 namelessname
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=332981     hua_hui

hua_hui is also running the PolicyPal campaign but his alt lorylore is also on it as is his own account:



Which is against his own campaign terms:

Rules:

- No multiple accounts/farming accounts.

This is why there should be more scrutiny on random accounts becoming campaign managers because there far too much incompetence and shadiness going on with them. His campaigns should probably be looked into because I'm sure he's probably paying a load more of his alt accounts.

Why these accounts still no red tagged it is because of their ranked? If these account is low rank i think it was easy to tagged as bounty cheater right! It is obvious that this user violates the rules of this forum but still he can continue his shady work because the account is still clean.

[BTCeminjas]

Woah, that is clear evidence against him and his alt account joining in one signature campaign and the sad thing he is abused his profession being a manager how could it be.

Then I saw also he did not have a negative trust, it looks like unfair to others here, that's not a good example especially for other members that newcomers here. I keep my eyes open on this if what will be the reactions other DT members. Let's wait.

[KeithBeeCham]

Why these accounts still no red tagged it is because of their ranked? If these account is low rank i think it was easy to tagged as bounty cheater right! It is obvious that this user violates the rules of this forum but still he can continue his shady work because the account is still clean.

High rank isn't the problem, if you go around this forum you can see there are so many Legendary accounts tagged. Maybe DT member or Mod are waiting for something or trying to catch a big fish ). Maybe there are still more account related to these accounts and they're working to find them out.

[ACVinegar]

Original account Aderiho Bitjones with wallet address of 17jivibLT1RnzHxZY9AeAVBUPccZTfwAEV was joined in "CellBlocks SIG and Avatar Campaign" together with their alt accounts coinbitrade with wallet address of 176TBB3BKDfxLcE55GUaFpNUKAhuSSnQyw

As reference it was reported for many times but still, they were allowed to join in signature campaign and they cannot get any sanction or negative trust. Proof that this is reported were shown on those link below:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2896910.msg32429312#msg32429312

[cunicula]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=332981

Lol..this guy deserves negative trust.

[hilariousetc]

These users should probably be looked into further. It's probably only the tip of the Iceberg to be honest and I'm sure there more shenanigans going on with hua_hui's campaigns, not to mention they are very badly run full of spammers and bots etc. The account is linked to a few more below and one that has seemingly not paid loans:

Because you can't give a few word answer even tho it would be appropriate to do so. Should everyone Write a three page essay just for one topic reply, get ya heads out of your asses. I see spammers all the time and I don't care, I just don't pay that much attention to them, deal with it...

OOps you just burned your account.  Go pay back your loans scumbag.

Name:   Tyrantt
Posts:   832
Activity:   294
Position:   Sr. Member
Date Registered:   December 14, 2015, 02:02:18 AM
Last Active:   Today at 06:33:29 PM
Email:   hidden
Website:   
Current Status:   Offline Offline
Bitcoin address:   1HdK3k1LWG429jADbu9GXTszWmGGz9uVdX

Is this campaighn still available? I've filled out the form a few moments ago.
post count:233
btc address: 1HdK3k1LWG429jADbu9GXTszWmGGz9uVdX

Yes, definitely.
traktorista have been using this address 1HdK3k1LWG429jADbu9GXTszWmGGz9uVdX (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=840124.msg12730279#msg12730279) for signature campaign and what he said "brother" is actually himself. Liers!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=840124.msg12730279#msg12730279

Id like to enroll

Posts: 17
activity: 17

btc address: 1HdK3k1LWG429jADbu9GXTszWmGGz9uVdX

Signed up as Tyrantt, btc address 1HdK3k1LWG429jADbu9GXTszWmGGz9uVdX

Also, forum really seems nice, I think I might even hang out there.

I'd like to join.

Ill post here too:

starting post: 353

btc address: 1HdK3k1LWG429jADbu9GXTszWmGGz9uVdX

I am currently holding his account as collateral.
This is tx:https://blockchain.info/zh-cn/tx/dbf878723436d3da6fba61ab43b8fe3429694551f16118086cf3884f29e4dcdb

Btc amount: 0.09btc
address: 1HdK3k1LWG429jADbu9GXTszWmGGz9uVdX
interest: 40% (I can send you weekly, so that 8$ for 4-5 weeks) that would be 28$ for a total repay
Thank you very much.

Please repay to for each installment: 1xWop24MSPuYeWZ53Fo6YzJsHvMjr4EYM
They will be scheduled at next 4 weeks: 9 June, 16 June, 23 June, 30 June. At fifth week, if you pay full amount of each installment ( 8$ equivalent of Bitcoin amount) at previous four weeks, I will return the account to you!
Thanks!

Accounts connected: hua_huia, lihuajkl, mezmerizer9 H.W.Z
Proof: address  is part of wallet 16e00c509a of which there are three addresses

Code:

1MokVzFhvkb9jX8RScKdmPwnN63kfRoGCB
1MeUK9ofgyoeQNzqHiegH52FqcaKhBMnmV
19LjEqM5m14uzCBzPmWTNB7QPAan2ZcGaA

Addresses: address  1MeUK9ofgyoeQNzqHiegH52FqcaKhBMnmV is used here, here, address 19LjEqM5m14uzCBzPmWTNB7QPAan2ZcGaA is used here
Miscellaneous: hua_hui archive, check here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1247289.msg12970399#msg12970399.

The account mezmerizer9 was last used for the Bitstarz campaign with the address 19LjEqM5m14uzCBzPmWTNB7QPAan2ZcGaA

Bitcoin address:19LjEqM5m14uzCBzPmWTNB7QPAan2ZcGaA
Starting posts:710
Forum Rank at time of entry:Sr. Member

This is spend-linked to 1MeUK9ofgyoeQNzqHiegH52FqcaKhBMnmV ( link), which is again spend-linked to 1MokVzFhvkb9jX8RScKdmPwnN63kfRoGCB (link).

These addresses are under the control of lihuajkl and H.W.Z
They should provide explanations.

UID:178911
Bitcoin address: 1MeUK9ofgyoeQNzqHiegH52FqcaKhBMnmV
Starting Post Count(including this post):1496
Forum Rank at time of entry: Hero

Username: H.W.Z
Member rank: hero
Post count: 490
BTC address:1MokVzFhvkb9jX8RScKdmPwnN63kfRoGCB
Can I join?

[actmyname]

Not sure why the accounts haven't been tagged yet. I went ahead and negged hua_hui and all his other accounts. This is definitely not something that should be condoned, especially when one has a rule against it.

What a shitshow.