Bitcoin Forum
December 13, 2024, 09:41:27 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: The default response should be 2.1 quadrillion units...  (Read 991 times)
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
October 27, 2013, 02:41:51 PM
Last edit: October 27, 2013, 02:52:38 PM by cypherdoc
 #1

... of BTC ever to be made.

During public interviews.
Seccour
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1619
Merit: 1004


Bitcoiner, Crypto-anarchist and Cypherpunk.


View Profile
October 27, 2013, 02:46:58 PM
 #2

... of BTC ever to be made.

During public interviews.

Lie isn't a good idea.

exogan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 32
Merit: 0



View Profile
October 27, 2013, 02:51:21 PM
 #3

Why would you do that?
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
October 27, 2013, 02:54:55 PM
 #4

It's not a lie.

I'm defining Satoshi units. It's a more palatable number for the uninitiated.
TKeenan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 874
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 27, 2013, 03:06:34 PM
 #5

Why would you do that?
Because journalists go into a full scale panic when they are confronted with the notion that the world will only have 21 million currency units.  The way many of these journalism professionals got into journalism class in college is that first they flunked math class.  
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
October 27, 2013, 03:13:05 PM
 #6

given the inflated money supply we have experienced over the last 5 yrs, i'm sad to say that "a million" is considered chump change nowadays.

if you have a "quadrillion" now that's saying something.
dree12
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1079



View Profile
October 27, 2013, 04:04:38 PM
 #7

The precision will have to be moved someday, since 2.1 quadrillion is not that much when you consider the world population. So a more accurate response would be "unlimited units"? I think not.
zoinky
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 811
Merit: 1000


Web Developer


View Profile
October 27, 2013, 04:46:17 PM
 #8

Theres 21 million bitcoin, 2.1 quadrillion satoshis.  Thats the way to word it, in the future I don't think people will be saying Satoshi instead of Bitcoin when referring to 1.0 units of Bitcoin, so probably not the best idea to cause confusion now.
Pente
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 529
Merit: 527



View Profile WWW
October 27, 2013, 08:55:15 PM
 #9

I already do that, tell people that there are 2.1 quadrillion satoshi, about 300,000 per person worldwide.
gollum
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


In Hashrate We Trust!


View Profile
October 27, 2013, 10:13:07 PM
 #10

Satoshi made two mistakes IMHO:
1) The limit should have been 21 billions instead of 21 millions, with less decimals instead. This has a huge psychological effect since it means each humans have the potential to own 3 coins.
2) The inflation should have been set to 2% (same as gold) once the number reaches its limit of 21 million (or billion) coins. Inflation is needed since some coins will be hoarded for a very long time, and some coins will be lost due to data loss. A small inflation is also healthier than deflation for an economy since it encourages usage of the money instead of just hoarding. Even gold has inflation (the supply grows with 2% each year).
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!