cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
 |
October 27, 2013, 02:41:51 PM
Last edit: October 27, 2013, 02:52:38 PM by cypherdoc |
|
... of BTC ever to be made.
During public interviews.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
Seccour
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1619
Merit: 1004
Bitcoiner, Crypto-anarchist and Cypherpunk.
|
|
October 27, 2013, 02:46:58 PM |
|
... of BTC ever to be made.
During public interviews.
Lie isn't a good idea. |
|
|
|
exogan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
October 27, 2013, 02:51:21 PM |
|
Why would you do that?
|
|
|
|
|
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
October 27, 2013, 02:54:55 PM |
|
It's not a lie.
I'm defining Satoshi units. It's a more palatable number for the uninitiated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TKeenan
|
|
October 27, 2013, 03:06:34 PM |
|
Why would you do that? Because journalists go into a full scale panic when they are confronted with the notion that the world will only have 21 million currency units. The way many of these journalism professionals got into journalism class in college is that first they flunked math class. |
|
|
|
|
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
October 27, 2013, 03:13:05 PM |
|
given the inflated money supply we have experienced over the last 5 yrs, i'm sad to say that "a million" is considered chump change nowadays.
if you have a "quadrillion" now that's saying something.
|
|
|
|
|
dree12
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1077
|
|
October 27, 2013, 04:04:38 PM |
|
The precision will have to be moved someday, since 2.1 quadrillion is not that much when you consider the world population. So a more accurate response would be "unlimited units"? I think not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
zoinky
|
|
October 27, 2013, 04:46:17 PM |
|
Theres 21 million bitcoin, 2.1 quadrillion satoshis. Thats the way to word it, in the future I don't think people will be saying Satoshi instead of Bitcoin when referring to 1.0 units of Bitcoin, so probably not the best idea to cause confusion now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pente
|
|
October 27, 2013, 08:55:15 PM |
|
I already do that, tell people that there are 2.1 quadrillion satoshi, about 300,000 per person worldwide.
|
|
|
|
|
gollum
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
In Hashrate We Trust!
|
|
October 27, 2013, 10:13:07 PM |
|
Satoshi made two mistakes IMHO:
1) The limit should have been 21 billions instead of 21 millions, with less decimals instead. This has a huge psychological effect since it means each humans have the potential to own 3 coins.
2) The inflation should have been set to 2% (same as gold) once the number reaches its limit of 21 million (or billion) coins. Inflation is needed since some coins will be hoarded for a very long time, and some coins will be lost due to data loss. A small inflation is also healthier than deflation for an economy since it encourages usage of the money instead of just hoarding. Even gold has inflation (the supply grows with 2% each year).
|
|
|
|
|
|
