|
|
|
mboehler
Member
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
|
|
April 25, 2014, 07:08:16 PM |
|
Removing my ask until it is clear what type of contracts I have.
|
|
|
|
grnbrg
|
|
April 25, 2014, 11:10:25 PM |
|
Transaction: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Message from seller: ====== 63bondstobetransferredfrom13FeTCqHL62WxStSzDGWfHTpaeTduT6Dorto1Begwa4p3o8kghcAsKohVRxY2YgQoe4wSinexchangefor0.1965BTC.0.1965BTCwillbeescrowedto1EYVW34ceTXZ7Z1uhtZUu3R8fd3xtWi5jhand0.189BTCwillbepaidto13FeTCqHL62WxStSzDGWfHTpaeTduT6Dor ======
Good signature from seller: G3viyt1kFXmN46+b3Zns3KkgogFhmQDRo+wmUYKnMi7ZpSEA5Kvid+8vYw3ZyfxqXFVzfeRLeI5Htj6xOYTBDlE=
Message from buyer: ====== 63 bonds to be transferred from 13FeTCqHL62WxStSzDGWfHTpaeTduT6Dor to 1Begwa4p3o8kghcAsKohVRxY2YgQoe4wS in exchange for 0.1965 BTC. 0.1965 BTC will be escrowed to 1EYVW3ZUu3R8fd3xtWi5jh4ceTXZ7Z1uht and 0.189 BTC will be paid to 13FeTCqHL62WxStSzDGWfHTpaeTduT6Dor ======
Good signature from buyer: HLGF4kUzRU5ihSxqNyHrhbjBz6qMzR0/HSHW6F77ogHeG2VidDtTfHyB8h8wcqQNmOnudjtesdXqvQ9EK1XhcMc=
Account 13FeTCqHL62WxStSzDGWfHTpaeTduT6Dor has gone from 63 to 0 bonds. Account 1Begwa4p3o8kghcAsKohVRxY2YgQoe4wSr has gone from 1671 to 1734 bonds.
0.189 BTC paid to 13FeTCqHL62WxStSzDGWfHTpaeTduT6Dor via transaction 4fc07d04efb6a388cf46cfcdac4a5708a6c107b886817dc3901311f00b720af3 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://www.grnbrg.org/grnbrg_pubkey.asc
iEYEARECAAYFAlNa6oYACgkQQVjU3hFFtmcOZgCfX+STQGozOvM53ir60QQ+bwZi dQYAnj7uXeOWtr661qcPa/mbGJ8XwGMl =wXNB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
grnbrg.
|
|
|
|
grnbrg
|
|
April 25, 2014, 11:11:27 PM |
|
Sorry for not paying as much attention here as I should have... I missed the emailed notification and didn't realize there had been posts.
grnbrg.
|
|
|
|
grnbrg
|
|
April 27, 2014, 01:55:53 AM |
|
And a repost of the how-to, to make things run as smoothly as possible.... (I'm leaving the transaction fee at 0.015 BTC for now. - Seller has a public Bitcoin addrss <Seller-Address>, Buyer has a public address (which may be new, if the buyer does not currently hold any LRM bonds) <Buyer-Address>.
- Buyer and Seller have agreed on the number of bonds, and a price for the transfer.
- Fee for the transaction is 0.015BTC.
- Both Buyer and Seller need to sign and send the below message to me, via PM, email, IRC, carrier pigeon, or some other method. I don't care how it gets to me, I just need the message.
- The message should be a single line of text. Multiple lines tend to be easier to mess up.
- Message should be:
<Number> bonds to be transferred from <Seller-Address> to <Buyer-Address> in exchange for <Price> BTC. <Price> BTC will be escrowed to 1EYVW3ZUu3R8fd3xtWi5jh4ceTXZ7Z1uht and <Price - 0.015> will be paid to <Sellers-Address>- BTC can be sent to escrow at 1EYVW3ZUu3R8fd3xtWi5jh4ceTXZ7Z1uht (my address) at any time in the process. If the transaction fails, I will return 100%.
- Once I have verified the signatures from both messages and received the payment, I will transfer the payment (less the fee) to the seller.
- Once the seller is paid, I will communicate the trade to Lab_Rat, the buyer and seller, and post it publicly here. This final trade notification will be signed with my GPG key.
Note that the above message is just a suggestion, which assumes payment of the fee by the seller. As long as it is unambiguous, and states the obligations of all involved, it really doesn't matter. There is also no requirement to escrow through me, as long as the payment method is clear in the signed messages. And it's best to not include the userid or contact info of either party in the message. It's not needed, and some people will object to being so identified. grnbrg
|
|
|
|
|
grnbrg
|
|
April 27, 2014, 07:56:05 PM |
|
Transaction: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Message: ====== 100 bonds to be transferred from 1688B3b9e2A5Snhujst4QKjGrSLUGn9XP8 to 1EGYGJzeomNqazvokcyPVDt2EYLALZXpG5 in exchange for 1 BTC. 1.0075 BTC will be escrowed to 1EYVW3ZUu3R8fd3xtWi5jh4ceTXZ7Z1uht and 0.09925 will be paid to 1688B3b9e2A5Snhujst4QKjGrSLUGn9XP8 ======
Good signature from seller: HJOOSA63Y3D79lAdlN1e740/2IK+LZnP3EFh7DTL8/At9MsZcUXlslZHmiBsTRpOuPLUU+bP9PaTL7wAmxHq1Xo=
Good signature from buyer: G0YnpSrC2drh46CBYv4MWJ0ho3Z8LIzqZz/gqd4X/UlBtUWs3k+tWo0BeXJ8PzP4OHQ5DtPCVwI/6xXSgzpad8U=
Account 1688B3b9e2A5Snhujst4QKjGrSLUGn9XP8 has gone from 387 to 287 bonds. Account 1EGYGJzeomNqazvokcyPVDt2EYLALZXpG5 has gone from 519 to 619 bonds.
grnbrg: I've corrected the obvious typo in the transaction message, and sent 0.9925, not 0.09925 to the seller. Since it doesn't negatively impact either party, I didn't require a new message and signatures.
0.9925 BTC paid to 1688B3b9e2A5Snhujst4QKjGrSLUGn9XP8 via transaction f7b86bd06e5209ee75ddb31b638948deb76959d19802193c19dc27e0b80799bf -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://www.grnbrg.org/grnbrg_pubkey.asc
iEYEARECAAYFAlNdYH8ACgkQQVjU3hFFtmfP1QCgpWc+sCjZU3en+8LiKf+NcNDa 8ZcAn2p97JTNZBqGeyM8UdjBHV3xrziu =xZxG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
grnbrg.
|
|
|
|
elitenoob
|
|
April 27, 2014, 08:39:01 PM |
|
@grnbrg You got some sort of insider info or why this sudden purchase
|
|
|
|
grnbrg
|
|
April 27, 2014, 09:01:26 PM |
|
@grnbrg You got some sort of insider info or why this sudden purchase No secret insider info. I think the contract price is lower than it should be, and that (barring any legal suits, which I think will cause more harm than do good) they are probably as low as they will go. Worth gambling another coin over, I think. grnbrg.
|
|
|
|
|
Flashman
|
|
April 28, 2014, 01:30:27 AM |
|
No secret insider info. I think the contract price is lower than it should be, and that (barring any legal suits, which I think will cause more harm than do good) they are probably as low as they will go. Worth gambling another coin over, I think.
grnbrg.
Nah, I think he's got to guarantee about 700Mh to be worth that.
|
TL;DR See Spot run. Run Spot run. .... .... Freelance interweb comedian, for teh lulz >>> 1MqAAR4XkJWfDt367hVTv5SstPZ54Fwse6
Bitcoin Custodian: Keeping BTC away from weak heads since Feb '13, adopter of homeless bitcoins.
|
|
|
|
|
ICantThinkOfaName
|
|
April 28, 2014, 02:41:33 PM |
|
Isn't a bit of a conflict of interest if grnbrg can undercut our bids (slightly) by using his own time instead charging the fee? I'm not up in arms about it or anything, just an observation.
|
|
|
|
Ashitank
|
|
April 28, 2014, 05:36:58 PM |
|
grnbrg check PM.
|
|
|
|
grnbrg
|
|
April 28, 2014, 06:40:18 PM |
|
Transaction: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Message from seller (Note the trailing linebreak): ====== 112 bonds to be transferred from 1HruDn7vuahnCsD4axQ6XEFi2mgFXExLNC to 17JJ3QzgPpaVZqTtsQngAGY8qzuKf3knyb in exchange for 0.448 BTC. 0.448 BTC will be paid to 1HruDn7vuahnCsD4axQ6XEFi2mgFXExLNC.
======
Good signature from seller: IMcEIvY5IbC4AQbac/GuEXoglKv6M6ZCqtqfEPolNQ4Ia5pdntgwwPnhH/bwyoJTrJSH8VuI9HjYglaMuEBSSQo=
Message from buyer: ====== 112 bonds to be transferred from 1HruDn7vuahnCsD4axQ6XEFi2mgFXExLNC to 17JJ3QzgPpaVZqTtsQngAGY8qzuKf3knyb in exchange for 0.448 BTC. 0.448 BTC will be paid to 1HruDn7vuahnCsD4axQ6XEFi2mgFXExLNC. ======
Good signature from buyer: HMEzXuzM8giWEwRXaBPWKqIdod95dk74b1PN1V7iX3iN2JeZQNFoFRgC0E5vu8dTHlsCBiaPi21Ut9FqelCEva8=
Account 1HruDn7vuahnCsD4axQ6XEFi2mgFXExLNC has gone from 336 to 224 bonds. Account 17JJ3QzgPpaVZqTtsQngAGY8qzuKf3knyb has gone from 1650 to 1762 bonds.
0.448 BTC paid to 1HruDn7vuahnCsD4axQ6XEFi2mgFXExLNC via transaction d2086e44acad57f9880f5f3bad6601a2b71452f58d6c36ce607f94de9213ccb1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://www.grnbrg.org/grnbrg_pubkey.asc
iEYEARECAAYFAlNen9UACgkQQVjU3hFFtmd3xgCgr1tl3abc+ENaPtC1FVvXqeaL rOcAn1n0OakamQ8wQS6AUSnga46YaOuz =EHam -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
grnbrg.
|
|
|
|
|
grnbrg
|
|
April 28, 2014, 07:13:42 PM |
|
Just a reminder to all who are buying and selling contracts...
The original LRM bonds underwent a 1 -> 3 split in March. If you had previously bought 100 bonds, you now hold 300 contracts. Keep that in mind for your trades.
grnbrg.
|
|
|
|
|