Bulitt
Member
Offline
Activity: 108
Merit: 11
|
|
April 08, 2018, 01:37:58 PM |
|
Why are some people mining cryptonight v7 with rx 4XX/5XX series cards? Not sure if i'm missing something but isn't ETH still the more profitable coin to mine? Just because the fork happened it does guarantee that it will be more profitable.
My RX 580 only gets 19.2MH/sec on ETH as Its on a stock bios (I use it for gaming) With a slight Wattman overclock on the VRAM it gets 700H/sec with Claymore.
|
|
|
|
smoolae
|
|
April 08, 2018, 01:55:39 PM |
|
5X R9 290 rig 4.1kH/s (ca 850h/s per card). Could probably squeeze out a bit more but don't see any reasonable reason to do so.
|
|
|
|
Vann
|
|
April 08, 2018, 01:56:54 PM |
|
Why are some people mining cryptonight v7 with rx 4XX/5XX series cards? Not sure if i'm missing something but isn't ETH still the more profitable coin to mine? Just because the fork happened it does guarantee that it will be more profitable.
After the fork and the difficulty adjusted, profitability on XMR went up ~4x. At the current price and difficulty 800 H/s is ~$1.25/day in profit after power. https://crypt0.zone/calculator/details/XMR?hr=800&pwr=110&ec=0.12&fee=3&cur=USD&average=3h&exchange=0
|
|
|
|
skablast
Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 19
|
|
April 08, 2018, 01:59:44 PM |
|
Why are some people mining cryptonight v7 with rx 4XX/5XX series cards? Not sure if i'm missing something but isn't ETH still the more profitable coin to mine? Just because the fork happened it does guarantee that it will be more profitable.
that's easy to answer: go to whattomine and make comparison for gpu it say: ethereum is better by far. in reality if you take Monero for example: the difficulty is 33180320682, compared to 129999999 whatto mine used yesterday and 1599999999 it was before the fork happened. so go to monero on WTM, under coin, insert the REAL difficult and make the calculation again and you will see by yourself. that's true for ALL the coin that forked. Monero hashrate was 1.300 Mhs and its now 276. Go figure how many BOTnet and Asic was mining...
|
|
|
|
Vann
|
|
April 08, 2018, 02:04:22 PM |
|
For some reason WTM removed XMR from the front page to compare with other coins. This is the calculator I'm using. https://crypt0.zone/calculator
|
|
|
|
Metroid
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 353
Xtreme Monster
|
|
April 08, 2018, 02:13:09 PM |
|
They re-added earlier today.
|
BTC Address: 1DH4ok85VdFAe47fSVXNVctxkFhUv4ujbR
|
|
|
treanski
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 106
ONe Social Network.
|
|
April 08, 2018, 02:25:14 PM |
|
Why are some people mining cryptonight v7 with rx 4XX/5XX series cards? Not sure if i'm missing something but isn't ETH still the more profitable coin to mine? Just because the fork happened it does guarantee that it will be more profitable.
beeeeeeeep wrong answer
|
|
|
|
Haruderty
|
|
April 08, 2018, 02:37:42 PM |
|
5X R9 290 rig 4.1kH/s (ca 850h/s per card). Could probably squeeze out a bit more but don't see any reasonable reason to do so.
What is the core/memory clock? Is that special BIOS? What miner software?
|
|
|
|
|
gotminer
Member
Offline
Activity: 644
Merit: 24
|
|
April 08, 2018, 03:27:48 PM |
|
XMR-Stak 2.3.0
6 Vega 56's - 11,300 - 11,500 h/s
|
Ok, I want you to walk back in there and very calmly, very politely tell the risk assessors to fuck off! -Mark Baum
|
|
|
Lunga Chung
Member
Offline
Activity: 277
Merit: 23
|
|
April 08, 2018, 03:58:16 PM |
|
5560 H/s with 6x RX570 4gb Pulse
XMR-STAK 2.4.2
settings in amd.txt, 2 thread, intensity 896 for each card
example:
// gpu: Ellesmere memory:3712 // compute units: 32 { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 896, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 1, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : true }, // gpu: Ellesmere memory:3712 // compute units: 32 { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 896, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 1, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : true
|
|
|
|
murgorx
Member
Offline
Activity: 443
Merit: 13
|
|
April 08, 2018, 04:12:02 PM |
|
Damn one of my cards is dying out on this new algo, otherwise, the rest of my rx580 are hashing 880h/s with 1140/2200 900 voltage.
|
|
|
|
NiklasFalk
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 1
|
|
April 08, 2018, 04:15:06 PM |
|
xmr-stak-v2.4.1-cuda8 (SMOS) 9x 1060 3GB 4923H/s (about 547 each at 80w, 150 core 1500 memory) I'm probably optimizing it a bit wrong, but it's still more profitable than equihash at the same settings now (cards runs about 7 C colder than on equihash for some reason).
|
|
|
|
feelinfroggy777
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
April 08, 2018, 05:37:40 PM |
|
I am getting around 930H/s with my threadripper 1950x on CrytoNightV7 via xmr. I was getting over 1200H/s before the update. Anyone know what I can do to get my hash rate back up to 1200?
I have large pages enabled and I am setting my CPU affinity.
|
|
|
|
playfast
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 131
Merit: 3
|
|
April 08, 2018, 05:53:22 PM |
|
xmr-stak-v2.4.1-cuda8 (SMOS) 9x 1060 3GB 4923H/s (about 547 each at 80w, 150 core 1500 memory) I'm probably optimizing it a bit wrong, but it's still more profitable than equihash at the same settings now (cards runs about 7 C colder than on equihash for some reason).
Hashrates aside, equihash was more profitable for me last month, because zencash went up from $17 to $24 this week. Because of how the market can move you're mistaken to think cryptonight is always more profitable than equihash, even though equihash gets inferior hashrates on AMD compared to equivalent nVidia cards.
|
|
|
|
whoismoses
Member
Offline
Activity: 247
Merit: 59
|
|
April 08, 2018, 07:35:05 PM |
|
They re-added earlier today. Oh darn! I liked be alone (with you guys).
|
|
|
|
Elder III
|
|
April 08, 2018, 09:39:43 PM |
|
5560 H/s with 6x RX570 4gb Pulse
XMR-STAK 2.4.2
settings in amd.txt, 2 thread, intensity 896 for each card
example:
// gpu: Ellesmere memory:3712 // compute units: 32 { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 896, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 1, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : true }, // gpu: Ellesmere memory:3712 // compute units: 32 { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 896, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 1, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : true
That's a very nice hashrate for Rx 570s. Is that bios modded? What drivers and clock/power settings are you using?
|
|
|
|
GeePeeU
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 545
Merit: 251
ASK
|
|
April 08, 2018, 10:15:31 PM |
|
Just tested it out a little bit.
1060 6gb 420-480 h/s
Fx-6350 (5/6cores) 180 h/s
Going to be interesting to see the Monero drama.
|
|
|
|
gotminer
Member
Offline
Activity: 644
Merit: 24
|
|
April 08, 2018, 11:17:50 PM Last edit: April 09, 2018, 01:10:17 AM by gotminer |
|
Damn one of my cards is dying out on this new algo, otherwise, the rest of my rx580 are hashing 880h/s with 1140/2200 900 voltage.
I noticed this today ... Kinda strange, not sure what's up with it. Thread 4 and 5 are slightly lower, because that's the card with the dummy hdmi in it, but thread 12 is way lower than normal. Not sure why that is. Something else to note ... With the old version of XMR STAK, I never got much above 11,500 h/s and all cards were looking normal as far as individual hashrate.
|
Ok, I want you to walk back in there and very calmly, very politely tell the risk assessors to fuck off! -Mark Baum
|
|
|
murgorx
Member
Offline
Activity: 443
Merit: 13
|
|
April 09, 2018, 06:45:00 AM |
|
I noticed this today ... Kinda strange, not sure what's up with it. Thread 4 and 5 are slightly lower, because that's the card with the dummy hdmi in it, but thread 12 is way lower than normal. Not sure why that is. Something else to note ... With the old version of XMR STAK, I never got much above 11,500 h/s and all cards were looking normal as far as individual hashrate.
Sorry for deleting the picture, just do not want to make this page harder to load, that's why I've removed it. What tool are you using to monitor your cards? I dropped mining XMR and currently I am on ETN, might not be as profitable as ETH and XMR, but my power draw is 500W from the wall and I see some potential growth, which in the long run might pay off better imo Hope I'm not wrong!
|
|
|
|
|