[Safety ADGEX ICO] ICO of public Australian company. Safety ICO ✔

[th4o]

It is difficult to explain why in different countries there are different rules for business.
Environmental projects must be supported at the state level. The first place should be ecology and not profit. For an example. In European countries, waste is put into different boxes (glass, paper, food waste and etc.). And they are successfully processed. In Russia, all fall into one garbage container, and most of the waste is not processed and rot on the landfills.
Ecology gets a lot of damage, landfill owners get huge profits. Polygon owners will be up to the last to hinder recycling, because they will lose profits.

Garbage is a serious problem. Without state support it can not be solved.

It's not even about support, but for example in the concept of taxation. If garbage is more expensive to burn than recycle, then obviously the enterprises will be engaged in its processing.

As the developers of the project declare, they already have the support of the government. I think that if it is required this will be fixed at the legislative level.

[1715375808]

1715375808

[1715375808]

1715375808

[1715375808]

1715375808

[1715375808]

1715375808

[Bearing Bear]

It is difficult to explain why in different countries there are different rules for business.
Environmental projects must be supported at the state level. The first place should be ecology and not profit. For an example. In European countries, waste is put into different boxes (glass, paper, food waste and etc.). And they are successfully processed. In Russia, all fall into one garbage container, and most of the waste is not processed and rot on the landfills.
Ecology gets a lot of damage, landfill owners get huge profits. Polygon owners will be up to the last to hinder recycling, because they will lose profits.

Garbage is a serious problem. Without state support it can not be solved.

It's not even about support, but for example in the concept of taxation. If garbage is more expensive to burn than recycle, then obviously the enterprises will be engaged in its processing.

As the developers of the project declare, they already have the support of the government. I think that if it is required this will be fixed at the legislative level.

Why did you start to connect Adgex and recycling wastes? Did they announced it?

[tilecuwi]

The project is oriented to real business, therefore all calculations can be made in dollars, not paying particular attention to exchange rates.

You mean Australian dollars? By the way, what taxes are in Australia for such companies?

I do not know 100%, but I can assume that taxes for companies dealing with ecology and related topics are minimal.

[dan1elsjack]

The project is oriented to real business, therefore all calculations can be made in dollars, not paying particular attention to exchange rates.

You mean Australian dollars? By the way, what taxes are in Australia for such companies?

I do not know 100%, but I can assume that taxes for companies dealing with ecology and related topics are minimal.

That's twice more great, lower taxes and environmental care strategy makes Adgex interesting even more.

[kapa6ac]

Not bad idea. To carry out an ICO you need money. You need to find an investor who will invest in the project.  It will be necessary to find out why the inventors do not conduct ICO

Their team needs people who will be engaged. It is a good way to find developers to create a new project.

I also like this idea. I think it could contribute to the development of scientific research.

So you think Adgex will get the hardcap before the ICO will end?

[RobertStan]

The project is oriented to real business, therefore all calculations can be made in dollars, not paying particular attention to exchange rates.

Communication with real business is one of the strengths of this project.

Adgex is strong from all sides, technologies, good team, and also beeing a public company makes project exclusive.

[PinoyD]

Not bad idea. To carry out an ICO you need money. You need to find an investor who will invest in the project.  It will be necessary to find out why the inventors do not conduct ICO

Their team needs people who will be engaged. It is a good way to find developers to create a new project.

I also like this idea. I think it could contribute to the development of scientific research.

Scientific researches can be very profitable in short term, if inventions are revolutional

[iDrago]

It is difficult to explain why in different countries there are different rules for business.
Environmental projects must be supported at the state level. The first place should be ecology and not profit. For an example. In European countries, waste is put into different boxes (glass, paper, food waste and etc.). And they are successfully processed. In Russia, all fall into one garbage container, and most of the waste is not processed and rot on the landfills.
Ecology gets a lot of damage, landfill owners get huge profits. Polygon owners will be up to the last to hinder recycling, because they will lose profits.

Garbage is a serious problem. Without state support it can not be solved.

It's not even about support, but for example in the concept of taxation. If garbage is more expensive to burn than recycle, then obviously the enterprises will be engaged in its processing.

Does Adgex is going to participate for wasting recycling technologies?

I think I don't understand your question. Ask different way please

Do you have plans to cooperate with recycling wastes industry?

[Storyline23]

How are u different from other icos?

[LightFork]

The fact that your company ADGEX has been operating on the market for more than 6 years, is an official company and you have a license to work from the Australian government, these are very good and reliable factors in favor of your project. Tell me in which sectors of the economy your company works and what does it do?

The project has many advantages.
As can be seen from the white paper, the project is oriented to work in various areas related to environmental protection.

[Holopopstyir]

Reasonable move, taking into account the fact that now in major cities, conducting a lot of blockchain events.

I think blockchain tourism is very interesting. Although for serious investors there is no anything in it. They travel a lot.

I do not argue with this, but unfortunately for the time being I do not belong to this type of investors.

[but3rin]

How are u different from other icos?

In fact, Adgex has no competitors at all, because they have unique products and technologies.

[BaalMcKloud]

The project is oriented to real business, therefore all calculations can be made in dollars, not paying particular attention to exchange rates.

Communication with real business is one of the strengths of this project.

I agree with you, there is less profitability, but higher reliability and you can be confident in your investments.

[Bearing Bear]

The project is oriented to real business, therefore all calculations can be made in dollars, not paying particular attention to exchange rates.

Communication with real business is one of the strengths of this project.

I agree with you, there is less profitability, but higher reliability and you can be confident in your investments.

This project seems to be as profitable as real for growth.

[NewDeal]

How are u different from other icos?

In fact, a lot of fundamental differences. In many aspects, the project is unique. You should study white paper first.

[dan1elsjack]

What other projects have Adgex now? Maybe some new researches?

[Pay4youractivity]

It's not even about support, but for example in the concept of taxation. If garbage is more expensive to burn than recycle, then obviously the enterprises will be engaged in its processing.

As the developers of the project declare, they already have the support of the government. I think that if it is required this will be fixed at the legislative level.

It's a good news. To have support at a high level is always very profitable. Plus it provides a certain reliability.

[Whitethoughts]

So you think Adgex will get the hardcap before the ICO will end?

You inattentively read information about the project. The team plans to conduct the ICO until the hard cap is collected.

[Safety ADGEX ICO]

It is difficult to explain why in different countries there are different rules for business.
Environmental projects must be supported at the state level. The first place should be ecology and not profit. For an example. In European countries, waste is put into different boxes (glass, paper, food waste and etc.). And they are successfully processed. In Russia, all fall into one garbage container, and most of the waste is not processed and rot on the landfills.
Ecology gets a lot of damage, landfill owners get huge profits. Polygon owners will be up to the last to hinder recycling, because they will lose profits.

Garbage is a serious problem. Without state support it can not be solved.

It's not even about support, but for example in the concept of taxation. If garbage is more expensive to burn than recycle, then obviously the enterprises will be engaged in its processing.

Does Adgex is going to participate for wasting recycling technologies?

I think I don't understand your question. Ask different way please

Do you have plans to cooperate with recycling wastes industry?

We build our own recycling wastes industry. Much better and much profitable than we have now.

[Safety ADGEX ICO]

What other projects have Adgex now? Maybe some new researches?

Our attention is draw on ICO and our headline projects: greenBlaze, energyBrick and VITIM