LaitHonor
Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
|
|
April 13, 2018, 01:32:00 PM |
|
What ICO is not scam?
Dedicated to the next question in PM: "What is not a scam?". Are there any ICO projects in Russia or in the world worth investing in?
No, I do not. The entire crypt industry, with the exception of service projects, is a scam. Service projects are something that serves the industry itself. Exchanges, bots on stock exchanges, bots on forums, smm, exchangers, conducting cryptoconferences, cryptosmi, real mining. All this is like pickaxes and shovels for gold miners. It's exactly these things and are a quiet, systemic business with predictable growth.
A concrete example: bots for trading on the stock exchange, about which I wrote earlier. No stars. But there is a constant influx of users. The platform is growing, developing. And there is a clear understanding that in a year of development at such a rate, it will be possible to sell peacefully to someone large.
And everything that concerns ICO - it was your opportunity to earn exclusively speculative. Everyone in the head was sewing the firmware, that the best strategy is buy and hold. Like, buy any shit, preferably, more and more diverse. Somehow shit necessarily shoots. So it does not work. And earn here only those who managed to sell you shit for an invaluable little bit.
Do not worry. A sad fate befalls and traders. At what, not мaмкиныx, and quite to itself monsters. I see examples of how the crypt broke the image of strong, tough pros.
Kapitonych, who worked fiercely on the MICEX, had excellent figures, guessing the piamp siacoin. And he put everything. + 100500%. Not fixed. Result: a furious plum. Or United traders. The guys who once in the classical markets showed great results. Also drained. In the end, they also switched to service projects: media, events, exchanges, trainings, etc.
Why is that? Professional traders are used to classical markets. They already have a brazen brain: the habit of playing a complex game, according to the rules, with strong players. It's like the ancient Romans. Systematic, calm, intelligent.
But here they are faced with a 100% fierce, fraudulent market. The market is young, evil, hungry, unprincipled and laying down any rules. Clever Romans defeated the banal barbarians. Having a subscription to private trader chats where the pros are sitting, I can say that 9 out of 10 are in the red. The majority - in a very significant minus. Survived and came out with the X-boxes only a few serious scalpers. Wherever such monsters die, mere mortal chances are almost nonexistent.
There will be a crypt. But the ICO market will not recover. There will be single projects, large and fat. Like telegrams. Those for whom the ICO is simply a lightweight IPO model. We are attracting Fiat, instead of shares, tokens. It is quite reasonable. Another quarter and statistics will show that 99% of ICO's in 2017 did not fulfill their obligations. Most of them did not plan to fulfill them initially. The units wanted. But with such volatility, crypts keep the word almost not real. Therefore, even people with an initially bright idea, bring investors.
I could safely continue to catch the HYIP, describing a variety of scam projects. Absipative details of exactly who threw whom or plans whom. But there is no point in this. The work of all channels for exposing ICO, the essence, is useless. For scum everything, without an exception.
It's funny that useful guys who move blockade as a technology, in fact, a tool for fraud. Like the picks and shovels I wrote about above. They are cool, they are smart, no one understands what they are talking about. A group of these blessed are dragged through conferences. Aura of chosenness is created. And the essence of the conferences is simple: once again, shit the hamsters. The funny thing is that these clever guys deny the financial side of the crypt. Gentlemen. You are only needed to collect money from suckers. All. At this point, your function is exhausted.
In all this circus, I'm most interested in the device of the organizers' brain. And not like the guys from Sendcoin or Sudan Gold. These, then, just, as an example, resulted in absolute straightforwardness and stupidity of taking money away. No, they are not interesting. They are funny. But they cut down the money, so good fellows.
Great monsters are interesting. For example, the boldness with which Marinichev works. RMC. It's just fantastic, how confident the person spar and makes statements, a chance to implement which is almost absent. And even when all the terms have been profakapili, there is no product, there will be no promised X-files, it is still absolutely unruffled. I will not write details on the RMC. Who invested - in the subject. Who has not invested - can read about RMC profile forums such as bits.media.
I must say that due to this audacity and censorship in condemning the RMC, Dmitry stayed longer than anyone else. All the tokens of the other computers have gone into negative. rmc is holding. In the telegram channel rms, if you ask an uncomfortable question - just ban. No forums. There are no public groups. This is a very correct strategy. There is no information field, full vacuum - there is nobody to sow panic.
Or the pain of Chinese investors after SONM. They came, collected, dissolved. Filigree. Applause.
People who are capable of this, deserve respect. They live outside the established framework. They have and
|