SatoshiGrid.com - FIND THE SECRET SPOT AND WIN BTC! FREE CHANCE TO WIN 0.1 BTC

[sagrid]

UPDATED 12/23/2013


===============
First BIG JACKPOT WINNER. THE POT WAS DISCOVERED AT POSITION: 4506 LAST December, 21th.

Congratulations to the winner of the 3BTC, hope I can find him/her in the forum

The payment transaction:

https://blockchain.info/tx/f6fdd459b48d845632bf412354a3f7a3705228e1d970a57de15123bf013b7ed9



===============

Want a free coupon, reply to this thread and I'll send you a coupon to your inbox.

Don't want to wait, you can win a coupon by sharing on Facebook using this link http://www.satoshigrid.com/promosatoshi/


Want to give a shoot for the POT, currently 1 BTC? Use the following link:
SatoshiGrid.com

Rules of the game
Simply unlock a square and WIN THE POT. Whoever find it first takes it all.

Proof of fair of the current game: 8a40f85f3c5ea0899d153f3c50ed962310d97516







[AFFILIATES]
Referral people and earn 10% - For each player you referral your will be payed 10% of his bets.

Easy to apply, easy to win btc, high conversions (1 bet for each 40 visitors), ideal for forum signature. No registration needed.

To apply:

Enter to http://www.satoshigrid.com


And click in the link on the bottom of the page, follow the steps and you will get your affiliate link.

You can use it in your forum signature, and for each player who plays you will get 10% of its bet.


=====================================================================================

UPDATE: 06/23/2014

We are about to change the game modality to create a lot of more prizes into the game so this promotion won't last. When the new game is uploaded the promotional 0.1 BTC won't be available.


To apply: http://satoshigrid.com/promosatoshi

[addi]

pretty cool, however, provably fair is really required for this

[sagrid]

Yes, it has been implemented in our development server. We're uploading soon. I hope today.

[amiryaqot]

sounds great..

[lucaspm98]

 Once it's provably fair I'll be trying it out. Looks like fun!

[moderate]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=331347.0

[aksplace]

Once it's provably fair I'll be trying it out. Looks like fun!

What's the point? The owner will still know the winning box provably fair or not so if the individual is going to cheat he will make sure to buy the box in question that holds the winnings when he so chooses to do so. I think the only way this could be provably fair would be for a 3rd party to hold the secret.

[moderate]

Once it's provably fair I'll be trying it out. Looks like fun!

What's the point? The owner will still know the winning box provably fair or not so if the individual is going to cheat he will make sure to buy the box in question that holds the winnings when he so chooses to do so. I think the only way this could be provably fair would be for a 3rd party to hold the secret.

Darling, what you are looking for is not called provably fair. Please recheck what you know, or what you think you know, about that.

[aksplace]

Once it's provably fair I'll be trying it out. Looks like fun!

What's the point? The owner will still know the winning box provably fair or not so if the individual is going to cheat he will make sure to buy the box in question that holds the winnings when he so chooses to do so. I think the only way this could be provably fair would be for a 3rd party to hold the secret.

Darling, what you are looking for is not called provably fair. Please recheck what you know, or what you think you know, about that.

PROVEN EVENT #1:
If a site generates a random 256 bit number and provides me the hash I know they can't change it after the fact.  If they change their secret number it won't produce the same hash.

PROVEN EVENT #2
If I generate my own 256 bit number and provide it to the site (after EVENT #1) and the site XOR the two values to use as the "combined secret" then I can prove that the site couldn't have rigged the random number in their favor (as they don't know until after selecting their random number what mine will be).

PROVEN EVENT #3
If the game is based on the combined secret in #2 I can prove it was done fairly.  After the game the site will reveal their secret number (which I can verify hashes to the hash provided in event #1).  I can also verify that the "game secret" is the XOR of the house's secret number and my secret number.  Assuming the house also provides details steps on how that number produces the output I can verify they have shown me the proper output (sequence of cards, winning number, win/loss, etc).

When those three events occur and in the proper order, and are verified by the user it is not possible for the house to cheat.  Try to think of a scenario where the house could cheat and not be detected.  It is mathematically proven that if I lost then it was due to "fair chance".

[Boelens]

Just deposited but not receiving it, how many confirmations does a deposit need?

[moderate]

Once it's provably fair I'll be trying it out. Looks like fun!

What's the point? The owner will still know the winning box provably fair or not so if the individual is going to cheat he will make sure to buy the box in question that holds the winnings when he so chooses to do so. I think the only way this could be provably fair would be for a 3rd party to hold the secret.

Darling, what you are looking for is not called provably fair. Please recheck what you know, or what you think you know, about that.

PROVEN EVENT #1:
If a site generates a random 256 bit number and provides me the hash I know they can't change it after the fact.  If they change their secret number it won't produce the same hash.

PROVEN EVENT #2
If I generate my own 256 bit number and provide it to the site (after EVENT #1) and the site XOR the two values to use as the "combined secret" then I can prove that the site couldn't have rigged the random number in their favor (as they don't know until after selecting their random number what mine will be).

PROVEN EVENT #3
If the game is based on the combined secret in #2 I can prove it was done fairly.  After the game the site will reveal their secret number (which I can verify hashes to the hash provided in event #1).  I can also verify that the "game secret" is the XOR of the house's secret number and my secret number.  Assuming the house also provides details steps on how that number produces the output I can verify they have shown me the proper output (sequence of cards, winning number, win/loss, etc).

When those three events occur and in the proper order, and are verified by the user it is not possible for the house to cheat.  Try to think of a scenario where the house could cheat and not be detected.  It is mathematically proven that if I lost then it was due to "fair chance".

It might sound as a surprise to you, but copy&paste doesn't show you know shit. I don't even understand why you're pasting that, no one asked for it.

[aksplace]

Once it's provably fair I'll be trying it out. Looks like fun!

What's the point? The owner will still know the winning box provably fair or not so if the individual is going to cheat he will make sure to buy the box in question that holds the winnings when he so chooses to do so. I think the only way this could be provably fair would be for a 3rd party to hold the secret.

Darling, what you are looking for is not called provably fair. Please recheck what you know, or what you think you know, about that.

PROVEN EVENT #1:
If a site generates a random 256 bit number and provides me the hash I know they can't change it after the fact.  If they change their secret number it won't produce the same hash.

PROVEN EVENT #2
If I generate my own 256 bit number and provide it to the site (after EVENT #1) and the site XOR the two values to use as the "combined secret" then I can prove that the site couldn't have rigged the random number in their favor (as they don't know until after selecting their random number what mine will be).

PROVEN EVENT #3
If the game is based on the combined secret in #2 I can prove it was done fairly.  After the game the site will reveal their secret number (which I can verify hashes to the hash provided in event #1).  I can also verify that the "game secret" is the XOR of the house's secret number and my secret number.  Assuming the house also provides details steps on how that number produces the output I can verify they have shown me the proper output (sequence of cards, winning number, win/loss, etc).

When those three events occur and in the proper order, and are verified by the user it is not possible for the house to cheat.  Try to think of a scenario where the house could cheat and not be detected.  It is mathematically proven that if I lost then it was due to "fair chance".

It might sound as a surprise to you, but copy&paste doesn't show you know shit. I don't even understand why you're pasting that, no one asked for it.

You asked me to recheck what I know regarding provably fair so I published it.  So, Darling.. Tell me how that is not relevant with what I originally published.

[sagrid]

Just deposited but not receiving it, how many confirmations does a deposit need?

0 Confirmations for start playing, 2 confirmations of your previous deposits for withdrawals.


are you still not seeing your balance?

[moderate]

Darling, what you are looking for is not called provably fair. Please recheck what you know, or what you think you know, about that.

You asked me to recheck what I know regarding provably fair so I published it.  So, Darling.. Tell me how that is not relevant with what I originally published.

It is irrelevant because the time you took to paste that text wasn't enough to understand the reason for the starting reply. The important part is figuring out that what you are calling as provably fair is not what provably fair is about.

[Eternity]

New thinking look really cool

[Eternity]

Can you give some free coins ?

[sagrid]

Proof of fair uploaded!! Thanks for the patience



Eternity, thank you for your comment!

[moderate]

Proof of fair uploaded!! Thanks for the patience

How many extra prizes are there ?

This sentence is wrong: "The bet rises as the probabilities of finding the secret block decreases."

[sagrid]

Thanks for the corrections, honestly english is not my mother language

[sagrid]

Proof of fair uploaded!! Thanks for the patience

How many extra prizes are there ?

This sentence is wrong: "The bet rises as the probabilities of finding the secret block decreases."

First of all there's the pot, now is 3 BTC for an only winner

Then you have:

(3) that will multiply your bet 10 times
(20) that will multiply your bet 5 times
(200) that will multiply your bet 2 times