ICO rating sites

[lushlifing]

Good day, about ico rating/listing sites, are they legit? do they evaluate truthfully? do they really have have experts? or they rate an ICO depending on their payment to them? 

[batang_bitcoin]

Good day, about ico rating/listing sites, are they legit?

They are legit websites that are advertising those ICOs.

do they evaluate truthfully?

Not all of them, some are just listing ICOs because they are paid.

do they really have have experts?

Experts on analysis about those ICOs? Have you read an ICO rating with bad review?

they rate an ICO depending on their payment to them? 

This is the reality.

[asriloni]

Good day, about ico rating/listing sites, are they legit? do they evaluate truthfully? do they really have have experts? or they rate an ICO depending on their payment to them? 

Majority of them are not legit in my opinion because a lot of them getting paid to give a good rating to the scam ico. I just know some of them which used the community vote to listed a good ico but it's no more than 5 sites.
The rest just getting paid to write a good review to the ico and that's horrible site to misleading the readers.

[chris200x9]

Good day, about ico rating/listing sites, are they legit? do they evaluate truthfully?

Some may be legit but most of the time these sites provide a paid reviews so it is our responsibility to cross-check the information what they provided is correct or not.

If all of them provide a correct information then most of the scam ICO's shouldn't have generated money from the public.

do they really have have experts? or they rate an ICO depending on their payment to them? 

Surely they are better than normal investors but everyone in this world needs money so many of them are paid reviews.

[AlexaSonda]

Your question about rating sites is a concern everyone feels, do we have to trust it and can be a recommendation for choosing an investment?

I honestly do not like it, because the average rating they give to an ico is not an indicator of whether the project is worth it or not and it is not a guarantee that ico is good or not a scam.

You can choose ico from the rating site that has the best rating, but you have to do re-research and also discuss to get the best investment option.

[BitcoinCazh]

before im invest or join in the bounty, im always seeing the bounty with rating like in the : ico bench and track ico, i think thats ico rating is legit because rating they get from user, so thats ico is clearly when good its will good rating and when bad is will show bad

[normensky012]

Good day, about ico rating/listing sites, are they legit? do they evaluate truthfully? do they really have have experts? or they rate an ICO depending on their payment to them?  

They all look like paid reviews to me. Even with all these ICO gatekeepers and questionable score review, you can't guarantee that it is truthfully reviewed. Although they somehow have criteria upon reviewing and scoring it. But still, I just look at these ICO listing websites to look for the ICO website link easily. I don't care about the score and sponsorshit. I only care about is if the project has significant importance, useful protocol, has potential growth and if the team is capable of doing these projects. I call it due diligence.

[labake]

As a matter of fact, I don’t believe in any ICO rating site base on my opinion which is these sites are also strictly on business. Really, they may be truthful on some matters but if they get paid for the ones whose are not up to full ratings and they would over hype them base on the money they received. Eyes must be opened by investors and make their own research.

[DarkBullet]

Not all of those reviews from these ICO rating sites are legit. We all know how money talks, those are created just for paid advertisement. Besides, who wants to advertise an ICO for free? Most of these websites mislead the investors by providing inaccurate information. As you notice, there are some airdrops that showed as scam but given a good review from ICO rating sites right? It is still better if we just do our own research instead of relying to these deceiving information.

[Papcio77]

Well dont depend if you want investment in qny ico ratings site.  Some project rated as 3.7 all most half of maximum rate meaning high risk to join. Some project rated as 4.8 meqning good to join. But unfortunately the one who rated as low is become successful ICO price of 0.06 and hit exchange all hit 1$. And the one rated high become scam

In conclusion do a self research before join

[l10no]

in my opinion not all of ico rating/listing sites is legit and and evaluate truthfully, sometimes some of those sites are paid to make good ratings. because now there are many  ICO scams.
so we have to be more careful in choosing ICO and search refernces first before to invest.

[dmitro853]

Good day, about ico rating/listing sites, are they legit? do they evaluate truthfully? do they really have have experts? or they rate an ICO depending on their payment to them? 

If we look at such sites, it becomes clear to us that they are paid and they advertise, because there are certain sites where just the entire ICO collection is presented, both good and bad. But there are also those who really analyze the ICO and give their subjective assessment, if the project is bad, they do not even put it on their site.

[adam1230]

Most of ICO rating sites are giving incentive rates. They got paidfrom bounty pool and most of them are not accurate.
I never follow them. Our forum is more good to find good ico's. I follow forum announcement and discussion topics.

[Brothersav]

Good day, about ico rating/listing sites, are they legit? do they evaluate truthfully? do they really have have experts? or they rate an ICO depending on their payment to them? 

There are some legitamet ones, icobench.com is for example. There are people who are professionals and rate each ICO. They have different weightings per how high they are on the food pyramid. Take a look at Darico.io's ICO on ICObench. (https://icobench.com/ico/darico) > Under ratings you will see most people are 6% rating, as per their qualification and experience in the cryptofield.

[Coltpython]

Its not advisable to believe everything you read about ICOs through ICO rating websites. A lot of them are biased and get paid to spew out positive information about a project. Its better to do your own research before going ahead with investing

[chrismartin]

Those websites are all legit mate but they listed that ico to advertise to their website because they have been paid by the team at that said ico. They have been rated good because of those people who think are legit. I think you should make your own research compare to going that site for an ico list because not all of them have the power to be successful

[rucapri0]

Just know that most ICO is scam. But it is possible for some to earn on short-term increase in the price of tokens

[klement.i]

I see no reason to trust any information on the Internet. Since most resources live at the expense of their customers, whose content they advertise

[laros212]

I think it's only seen from visitors as well as members in their media..to be more convincing maybe we see whose partners are in their project. maybe it's more support in choosing a good ico project

[GoldenLad]

Good day, about ico rating/listing sites, are they legit? do they evaluate truthfully? do they really have have experts? or they rate an ICO depending on their payment to them?  

I doubt if they evaluate their listed ICO truly cause most of them are being paid to do it, so it's not as if they have invested in the ICO or done a thoroughly research before rating. Though, some of them might be good, but do not depend solely on it. I will advise you to make your own research and find things yourself cause to decide if you will invest in it or not. Cause not everything the rating states about the ICO might be true.