ICO rating sites

[batang_bitcoin]

This guy answered your questions simply but truthfully..remember in this community MONEY is what dictates everything,so you have already an idea about them being Paid to make good feedback in any ico,but mate is right thats the reality of being here.

Newly generated ICOs are doing everything they can just to market out their project/product. And we all know that newbies are looking for reviews from this, that, those ICOs that they viewed on the web. But I'm not removing the fact that there are reviewers/bloggers/rating sites that legit giving a helping hand to the newbies who just want to learn more about investing in crypto/ICOs. Sadly majority of the ICO rating/review sites are in favor of giving themselves and those listed ICOs benefits for each other.

[iAMawi123]

Some ICO rating sites are legitimate. But I think for me, we should not really rely on ICO review websites because they cannot fully guarantee the assurance of your comfortability and security in a project that they have reviewed. Also, some ICO ratings sites rate a lot of ICOs really high it is because the projects paid the ICO review sites.

[askmecrypto]

Good day, about ico rating/listing sites, are they legit? do they evaluate truthfully? do they really have have experts? or they rate an ICO depending on their payment to them? 

Personally, I dont depend on ICO Rating websites while evaluating an ICO. Most of them are paid raters and they rate an ICO as per the payment they receive from the project team.
I still keep a track on them as they give you info about active ICOs and future ICOs which later I do my research to decide weather to take part in it or not.

[alex-nn]

I consider icodrops to be the best ICO tracking site. In the issue of critical thinking, they are much better than their competitors. There are less projects here, but it's connected to a scrupulous approach by owners. Surely, they also make mistakes and it's bad to blindly believe in any opinion, but if I see a project is listed on icodrops, I always start to pay it much more attention.

100% Agree: icodrops have good team (i know some of them) which researches ICOs and publish only the best ones on their site

[castellodocet]

I only trust announcements and news posted in bitcointalk forum, because it's moderated well and there's no chance of fake reviews about ICOs

[cryptomarijuana]

These websites shouldnt be trusted because they are getting paid for every review that they are doing which i why we should rely to our own research as these people are fooling most of the investors maybe because they are part of these scam ICOs which is why they are giving out good reviews despite that the project doesnt have any good developments.

[Classica35]

Yes, many ICO listing sites are legit, but we find some listing scam ICOs. Which means some of them compromise their standards. Although, there are some that are still sincere about their evaluation. Even if an ICO listing site has done its evaluation of a project, it will be good you also try to do your own little findings.
This ICO listing sites list projects that pay them. So, it is based on payments.

[cryptocrocs]

Good day, about ico rating/listing sites, are they legit? do they evaluate truthfully? do they really have have experts? or they rate an ICO depending on their payment to them? 

Morelikely no,these review websites are unreliable because they are into money thing,fake reviews are given because they are getting paid for every good reviews that they give to these ICOs which might cause for these investors to get trapped with these scam ICOs,we shouldnt be trusting these websites,do our own research so that we wont regret joining.

[cryptonero]

Not going to be reliable websites are they are getting paid most of the time by these scammers,i never do rely to these sites because they are asking for some amounts for the reviews in every ICO,those scams are being hyped by these websites that is why i wont rely to these shit sites as they are fooling people most of the time.

[ruhvix]

As for me, i never trust ICO rating and another platform for review about new projects

[makuhpal]

Unreliable websites,which shouldnt be trusted because noob investors are getting rekted by these reviews,paid reviews from these so called experts which arent giving good reviews,they have been fooling the people most of the time! i would say they are part of these scams which is why they are hyping such scam projects.

[cryptoheroin]

These websites and people shouldnt be trusted when it comes with our investments because these are going to mislead us,most of the websites are getting paid by these scammers to put some good review to the ICO even if theres no reference to what they are claiming,they might be part of these scams that is why they are hyping scams most of the time.

[reypinioco]

In my owm humble opinion these websites are giving away good reviews to those scams and most of the people here are right because they might be part of such scams which is why they are hyping such ICOs,and those poor investors are going to be mislead by these paid reviews! shouldnt be trusting any review sites at they are all for the money.

[rellor]

http://icorating.com

ICOrating specializes in evaluating companies with a planned ICO. ICOrating’s analysis is thorough and objective, reviewing companies as potential investment objects.

[cr7]

Good day, about ico rating/listing sites, are they legit? do they evaluate truthfully? do they really have have experts? or they rate an ICO depending on their payment to them? 

Depands on ratings.
I think, that most of them just looking superficially on all ICOs. And accordind to this they put ratings to the projects.
But I believe that there are some ratings, that really have experts and their grades mean something.

[9000]

I like what ICObench is doing. The rating is created by the community and real experts, so you have someone opinion to trust in. Few weeks ago they made an update of their website and now you can also see some events that might influence on the coin market price. Also, what we have to understand, this is the most popular listing platform at this moment. As big it is, as many ICOs it is possible to see there

[nakamote]

These sites are getting paid most of the time,that is why i wont be relying my decisions with these websites are they are just getting paid for every shit review from these ICOs! website like that shouldnt be trusted as they are just for the money,you will still get good reviews when you paid them every well,even if the project has turned into scams.

[BlockEye]

These sites are getting paid most of the time,that is why i wont be relying my decisions with these websites are they are just getting paid for every shit review from these ICOs! website like that shouldnt be trusted as they are just for the money,you will still get good reviews when you paid them every well,even if the project has turned into scams.

We have our option to analyze it on our own, if tons of icorating gives excellent review on that project thats the time for us to make a research whether that project really deserves the recognition as it gets high rating, those sites have some classifications on why they give that rate, so we better set our own classifications whenever we studying ICO for us not to blame or regret any decision made on that ICO.

[Distraction]

I think the ico rating scores are very wrong.Do your own research. İt is not hard. can be increased .

[cryptodevs]

These websites shouldnt be trusted as it is being paid by those ICOs which is why most of the newbie investors are getting rekt,because of the misleading reviews from the so called experts which doesnt have anythin just to put a sentence "good project,stong team" which is bullshit those sites like ICObench are purely bullshit,you should have done your own research.