sile16
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
June 24, 2014, 04:48:40 AM |
|
should be able to run NXT on there as it takes much less resources....
|
|
|
|
matthewh3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 24, 2014, 02:51:31 AM |
|
I think it'd be worthwhile making the satellite ground station also being HF tranceiver nodes using Q15X25 modulation - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q15X25 - or similar.
|
|
|
|
benjamindees
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 01, 2014, 08:52:29 AM |
|
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-07/31/nasa-validates-impossible-space-driveThe device uses a magnetron producing microwaves directed inside a specially shaped, fully enclosed tapering high Q resonant cavity whose area is greater at one end, upon which radiation pressure would act differently due to a relativistic effect caused by the action of group velocity in different frames of reference. The inventor claims that the device generates a thrust even though no detectable energy leaves the device. If proven to work as claimed, the EmDrive could allow the design of spacecraft engines that would be electrically powered and would require no reaction mass. Might want to hold off on the final design for a couple of years.
|
Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics
|
|
|
jgarzik (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1100
|
|
August 01, 2014, 11:42:51 AM |
|
Just held an 8-hour Preliminary Design Review (PDR) with Deep Space Industries, covering all major subsystems, ground station details, power/link/etc. budgets.
Lots going on behind the scenes, as this contract with Deep Space Industries proceeds.
|
Jeff Garzik, Bloq CEO, former bitcoin core dev team; opinions are my own. Visit bloq.com / metronome.io Donations / tip jar: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj
|
|
|
Jungian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 930
Merit: 1010
|
|
August 01, 2014, 07:21:57 PM |
|
Just held an 8-hour Preliminary Design Review (PDR) with Deep Space Industries, covering all major subsystems, ground station details, power/link/etc. budgets.
Lots going on behind the scenes, as this contract with Deep Space Industries proceeds.
Very cool! Thanks for keeping us updated
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
August 01, 2014, 11:58:27 PM |
|
Just held an 8-hour Preliminary Design Review (PDR) with Deep Space Industries, covering all major subsystems, ground station details, power/link/etc. budgets.
Lots going on behind the scenes, as this contract with Deep Space Industries proceeds.
Great work Jeff.
|
|
|
|
halorose
|
|
August 03, 2014, 04:52:49 AM |
|
Cool!really cool . awesome
|
|
|
|
MasterOwel
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Life is my dream, what is yours?
|
|
August 08, 2014, 08:23:10 PM |
|
This is a really crazy... awesome... intriguing idea. Every thing interesting and everything that bitcoin is. Kudos for the project, great idea.
|
|
|
|
syedkarim
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
August 13, 2014, 04:00:17 PM |
|
I just wanted to give a quick update regarding our own data broadcasting project. We are currently operational and are broadcasting across North America, Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa. Although small satellites do have their use case for telecommunications, from the perspective of getting a broadcast up and running and delivering a fast stream, you just can't beat geostationary satellites. Here's a quick overview of the system: http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-g-outernet-explained-20140808-htmlstory.htmlhttps://www.outernet.is/pages/how-toRight now we are broadcasting Wikipedia and Project Gutenberg eBooks. Bitcoin blockchain information is in the pipeline; it's just a matter of increasing the bandwidth on the satellite. Does anyone have any suggestions on what kind of data rate would be useful for this kind of broadcast ticker?
|
|
|
|
jgarzik (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1100
|
|
September 27, 2014, 02:15:15 PM |
|
Currently stuck in ITAR queue, waiting for US State Dept. to clear things which non-US people already known about and have access to...
|
Jeff Garzik, Bloq CEO, former bitcoin core dev team; opinions are my own. Visit bloq.com / metronome.io Donations / tip jar: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj
|
|
|
syedkarim
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
September 27, 2014, 03:52:17 PM |
|
What kind of data rates are you hoping to achieve with your cubesat? I think small satellites definitely have their place, but we are currently running a broadcast data service over all of North America, Europe, and MENA and have a minimum continuously bitrate of 56 kbps. We'll soon have access to a 50 Mbps channel and will be fully global. It's tough to get those kinds of numbers with small satellites, mostly due to power and heat issues. Of course, we need a lot more bandwidth because we are a general platform for broadcast data; bitcoin blockchain broadcasting will only be a small slice of the overall data carousel. youtube.com/watch?v=jNx3vDSuzkY
|
|
|
|
matthewh3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1003
|
|
September 29, 2014, 09:48:23 AM Last edit: October 20, 2014, 05:42:08 PM by matthewh3 |
|
Kryptoradio are broadcasting blockchain data in a 7.5kbps channel on the UHF band using the DVB-T1(or possibly)T2 codec in Finland. Using the Digital Radio Mondiale codec you could broadcast =>7.1kbps over a 5kHz channel on SW/MW/LW. Although renting SW transmitter broadcast time costs around $25k per month for 24/7/365 broadcasts. 5kHZ though is about a quarter of the bandwidth that current AM radio broadcast stations use on MW or LW. Another idea to look at terrestrial broadcasts although this time with full duplex is UHF IEEE 802.11ah meshnetworks. With a good external antenna you could get very good local range at 900Mhz so it could really work well for mesh-networking. The first IEEE 802.11ah chips are supposed to come out next year while the protocol should be finalised by 2016. Plus it's an unlicensed band so no one would need a ham license to set up a low power node.
|
|
|
|
jvol
|
|
September 29, 2014, 12:23:46 PM |
|
lets first settle bitcoin on earth...
|
|
|
|
xmasdobo
|
|
September 29, 2014, 01:55:30 PM |
|
In case the goverment goes nuts about Bitcoin and decides to shut down the entire internet, satilletes launched by fat Bitcoin whales could be what saves the day.
|
|
|
|
jgarzik (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1100
|
|
October 06, 2014, 06:56:48 PM |
|
An ad in USA Today's NASA special edition: http://imgur.com/RMdY7EM
|
Jeff Garzik, Bloq CEO, former bitcoin core dev team; opinions are my own. Visit bloq.com / metronome.io Donations / tip jar: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
October 06, 2014, 11:16:09 PM |
|
- Open Source Space - Space-as-a-Service (SaaS) - Wire the solar system for networking - Data centers on Luna and Mars luv it!
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
October 06, 2014, 11:23:20 PM |
|
Also some of these ideas are worth discussing as they have implications for significantly changing the computational resources required for a fully-validating bitcoin node ... and thus h/ware requirements for the BitSat cubes most likely. https://bitcoinfoundation.org/2014/10/a-scalability-roadmap/Particularly, whether the BitSat would carry the full blockchain or hashed UTXO with a confirmed depth only?
|
|
|
|
jgarzik (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1100
|
|
October 07, 2014, 01:40:13 AM |
|
Particularly, whether the BitSat would carry the full blockchain or hashed UTXO with a confirmed depth only?
As revealed at June's Bitcoin Beltway conference, the BitSat satellites will carry the full blockchain, and fully validate every block sent to it. This is in contrast with other systems that simply broadcast a datastream without validation, and therefore require much higher levels of trust than with BitSat.
|
Jeff Garzik, Bloq CEO, former bitcoin core dev team; opinions are my own. Visit bloq.com / metronome.io Donations / tip jar: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj
|
|
|
TheButterZone
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
|
|
October 07, 2014, 01:45:32 AM |
|
Particularly, whether the BitSat would carry the full blockchain or hashed UTXO with a confirmed depth only?
As revealed at June's Bitcoin Beltway conference, the BitSat satellites will carry the full blockchain, and fully validate every block sent to it. This is in contrast with other systems that simply broadcast a datastream without validation, and therefore require much higher levels of trust than with BitSat. Is it going to be bootstrapped as high as possible before launch, or will it have to download the entire blockchain while in orbit? LOL
|
Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
|
|
|
jgarzik (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1100
|
|
October 08, 2014, 12:05:30 AM |
|
Is it going to be bootstrapped as high as possible before launch, or will it have to download the entire blockchain while in orbit? LOL
heh, definitely loading the chain prior to launch. That's part of the pre-flight tests in fact.
|
Jeff Garzik, Bloq CEO, former bitcoin core dev team; opinions are my own. Visit bloq.com / metronome.io Donations / tip jar: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj
|
|
|
|