neutrinox (OP)
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
1MCKW9AkWj3aopC1aPegcZEf2fYNrhUQVf
|
 |
November 23, 2013, 02:55:33 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"There should not be any signed int. If you've found a signed int
somewhere, please tell me (within the next 25 years please) and I'll
change it to unsigned int." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BitChick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
|
|
November 24, 2013, 04:54:55 AM |
|
Well, a "little" for some guys on Wall Street could be a huge amount to some of us!  |
1BitcHiCK1iRa6YVY6qDqC6M594RBYLNPo
|
|
|
neutrinox (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
1MCKW9AkWj3aopC1aPegcZEf2fYNrhUQVf
|
|
November 24, 2013, 12:46:12 PM |
|
@n8rwJeTt8TrrLKPa55eU
Wow, nice article! Thanks!
@Bitchick
Indeed!
|
|
|
|
|
LiteCoinGuy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1010
In Satoshi I Trust
|
|
November 24, 2013, 01:35:55 PM |
|
mind-stift. this is all i say ;-)
12 month ago it was silk road money 6 month ago it was maybe a nice experiment but stay away, its shady stuff now they say: YOU CAN INVEST a little  in the future... |
|
|
|
|
blacksails
|
|
November 24, 2013, 01:58:23 PM |
|
mind-stift. this is all i say ;-)
12 month ago it was silk road money 6 month ago it was maybe a nice experiment but stay away, its shady stuff now they say: YOU CAN INVEST a little in the future... …BUY BUY BUY!!!!!! To the moon!! |
|
|
|
|
kjlimo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2086
Merit: 1031
|
|
November 24, 2013, 06:03:37 PM |
|
Tldr: spoiler alert, the answer is YES! Hahah
Woot!
Perhaps I will buy one of those trips to space... hahah
|
|
|
|
Cubic Earth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1018
|
|
November 24, 2013, 06:18:09 PM
Last edit: November 24, 2013, 10:29:26 PM by Cubic Earth |
|
It's sad they have done such a disservice to their readers. The article's mostly-good investing logic would have been just as applicable a year or two ago. I guess there was just too much intellectual laziness and other mental fog floating around the WSJ for anyone to bother to look at what bitcoin really is.
The readership is lucky, however, that the WSJ figured it out while the coins are still cheap.
edited for bad grammar
|
|
|
|
|
LiteCoinGuy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1010
In Satoshi I Trust
|
|
November 24, 2013, 06:30:27 PM |
|
It's sad they have done such a disservice to their readers. The article's mostly-good investing logic would have been just as applicable a year or two ago. I guess their was just too much intellectual laziness and other mental fog floating around the WSJ for anyone to bother to look at what bitcoin really is.
The readership is lucky, however, that the WSJ figured it out while the coins are still cheap.
agree here. i like the phrase " intellectual laziness ". |
|
|
|
|
BTCLuke
|
|
November 24, 2013, 08:11:40 PM |
|
Man o man, that was the WSJ! 2014 will surely be the year that all the Wall Street traders join this forum and flood us all out of here.  |
Luke Parker
Bank Abolitionist
|
|
|
TraderTimm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1121
|
|
November 24, 2013, 08:15:45 PM |
|
The mainstream financial press won't be screaming "BUY BUY BUY" until their traps are set and ready to fleece the unwary. Once Bitcoin reaches the stage of "financial engineering", you'll see some rather scammy products oriented around Bitcoin valuation. The only benefit however, is that they can't arbitrarily dilute Bitcoin itself, only the paper they put on top of it.
I bet it is coming, and not just the Winklevoss effort or the existing Bitcoin investment funds.
|
fortitudinem multis - catenum regit omnia
|
|
|
|
