It's sad they have done such a disservice to their readers. The article's mostly-good investing logic would have been just as applicable a year or two ago. I guess their was just too much intellectual laziness and other mental fog floating around the WSJ for anyone to bother to look at what bitcoin really is.
The readership is lucky, however, that the WSJ figured it out while the coins are still cheap.
agree here. i like the phrase " intellectual laziness ".