Ok thanks. How will it be managed if the blockchain get over 100GB. I think this is possible if the projekt runs in near future also more.
I think it could a good idea to change the scribt a little bit. Use not one blockchain, use a lots of them which are in cooperation. The blockchains in my futurtopic have a diffent conecting to the network. That will make it possible to differentiate important file and not so important files.
For example.
10 differnece blockchain
100.000 User
500 GB uploaded
One big blockchain includet all files and will be host at some sever that everyone can see the data without downloading blockchain. (also intersting to reach a lot of people, because not everyone will download a blockchain.)
Then the other blockchains subdivide the files after her importance. There are two ways to decide what is importace. First the uploader decide and have to make a bigger pay. If he can´t pay the community will maybe sponcored if it was really important or useful. The otherwise is the community asself decide what is important and what not and how important it is.
The most important files are in blockchain 9 the little less files are in 8 and so on.
The blockchain from 9 all ninth have to download it. The blockchain with a little less important files only every eights...and so on.
On this way we can save a lots of resources, i think. And the secound point is there are class-divided payment option. Pay more if you think it´s important. Pay less if it´s not so important, you think. Pay less or nothing if it´s important but the community supports your file.
Thats are just some idea comming in my brain during i read your projekt. Don´t want to keep them as mine :-)
Ps: Sorry for that bad english. ...i´m not really speak this language.
grezz noSlave
I got your point. You're talking about decentralized system with less redundancy than is presented by current Datacoin version. But it can create much more difficulties for maintenance: many users will have different versions of blockchain. It will add a lot of confusing: voting system, etc etc.
And the system will be vulnerable to someone who'll spam with incorrect voting like governments. Just imagine if any government wants to vote for some information to take it to the lowest priority blockchain. After successful voting this information will be much more vulnerable than in case when it is stored on computer of every Datacoin user.