[ANN]🚀 OPTHERIUM🚀 Synergy of Blockchain solutions

[berlinboy]

Wouldn't say significantly. It's a good thing to have an overhaul from time to time, but it's not like a huge change in the fundamentals.

It's clear that the team will not get many practical advice. But still listening to someone else's opinion is useful. You can hear something important.

The opinion surrounding was always important for business. And constructive criticism always helps to develop projects well

Opinion brings its result, the main thing is to use it right and take note.

That's why the teams visit the conference. There they not only conduct a presentation, but listen to the feedback of participants. If the project does not like the people, then the idea is unfinished. If the project is like, then there are partners.

[1715497890]

1715497890

[1715497890]

1715497890

[1715497890]

1715497890

[1715497890]

1715497890

[Charisma359]

Sometimes if you do that there are two possibilities of loss or gain, of course in this state is needed mental and proper analysis to make everything become profitable.

If the investor does not learn to analyze projects and will buy tokens all in a row, then he can stay with nothing. He will not get any profit.

[oficman]

All investors who buy during the ICO have the same risk. I think, bonuses are nothing more than a marketing move. After listing on the exchange, the risk is significantly reduced.

In theory, these bonuses should at least slightly ease the risk of investors. When all teams of projects work well, there will be no need for these bonuses. Investors will buy tokens without them.

Probably yes. I remember only one fraudulent project, which abruptly ended its work until the end of the ICO on schedule. They do not need to stop their activities until the flow of new money is over. Therefore, bonuses are unlikely to reduce the risk for all investors. Of course, it can be precisely stated that the first will have more profit.

But for the first investors, there are always a lot of users pulling up when they see that the first lot of tokens is being bought up. That's why it's important to display the statistics of selling tokens online.

[alexcraft1590]

Sometimes it is, because investors can enter there, which cover a significant part of the required amount or all of it.

As a rule, only large investors visit closed conferences. For them, preferential terms for the purchase of tokens are offered.

It's right. Sometimes large investors hold closed conferences, which attract a very large part of the funds. Of course, such investors receive some bonuses.

First investors get good bonuses because they risk the most. Many investors are waiting for the project to collect something and then only want to invest themselves

Or they wait for the moment when the project's token will be added to the stock exchange. Many of this type of investment is considered the most secure. But these investors earn little.

I think that they also earn good money if they buy a coin in time after entering the exchange. But of course the risks of such investors are much lower

Sometimes if you do that there are two possibilities of loss or gain, of course in this state is needed mental and proper analysis to make everything become profitable.

When investing in a project at any stage of its development, even before listing or after, there are still risks. But the fact that you need to invest money is good to think it all out

[SUNbitok]

Wouldn't say significantly. It's a good thing to have an overhaul from time to time, but it's not like a huge change in the fundamentals.

It's clear that the team will not get many practical advice. But still listening to someone else's opinion is useful. You can hear something important.

The opinion surrounding was always important for business. And constructive criticism always helps to develop projects well

Opinion brings its result, the main thing is to use it right and take note.

That's why the teams visit the conference. There they not only conduct a presentation, but listen to the feedback of participants. If the project does not like the people, then the idea is unfinished. If the project is like, then there are partners.

Yes, listening to opinions and wishes is the right strategy. This is necessary in order to make the project better and understand the mistakes made.

[STORMIX]

Wouldn't say significantly. It's a good thing to have an overhaul from time to time, but it's not like a huge change in the fundamentals.

It's clear that the team will not get many practical advice. But still listening to someone else's opinion is useful. You can hear something important.

The opinion surrounding was always important for business. And constructive criticism always helps to develop projects well

It should be borne in mind that business creates opinions. Also, they need criticism at the initial stage of development, from objective people, that is, professionals in the right case. They hardly need the opinion of random people.

I do not agree with you. In the end, the project is done for the users and if the majority points to some inexpensive, then any normal project will go to the meeting for its users

[big-svobodniy]

Wouldn't say significantly. It's a good thing to have an overhaul from time to time, but it's not like a huge change in the fundamentals.
It's clear that the team will not get many practical advice. But still listening to someone else's opinion is useful. You can hear something important.
The opinion surrounding was always important for business. And constructive criticism always helps to develop projects well

It should be borne in mind that business creates opinions. Also, they need criticism at the initial stage of development, from objective people, that is, professionals in the right case. They hardly need the opinion of random people.

I do not agree with you. In the end, the project is done for the users and if the majority points to some inexpensive, then any normal project will go to the meeting for its users

Developers need to know what users think about the project and it's also useful for investors to know the opinions of others.

[upline]

Wouldn't say significantly. It's a good thing to have an overhaul from time to time, but it's not like a huge change in the fundamentals.
It's clear that the team will not get many practical advice. But still listening to someone else's opinion is useful. You can hear something important.
The opinion surrounding was always important for business. And constructive criticism always helps to develop projects well

It should be borne in mind that business creates opinions. Also, they need criticism at the initial stage of development, from objective people, that is, professionals in the right case. They hardly need the opinion of random people.

I do not agree with you. In the end, the project is done for the users and if the majority points to some inexpensive, then any normal project will go to the meeting for its users

Developers need to know what users think about the project and it's also useful for investors to know the opinions of others.

I believe that it is very useful for developers to know the opinion of a product from other users in order to be able to correct shortcomings in time, if any.

[AltcoinsBattle]

If you affirm ideologically, then you are right. I think that in the real world the creators of any product work on the basis of profitability. To make a profit, they need to maintain interest in their product. Only for this the opinion of the majority is examined.

[Aleksandra 81]

If you affirm ideologically, then you are right. I think that in the real world the creators of any product work on the basis of profitability. To make a profit, they need to maintain interest in their product. Only for this the opinion of the majority is examined.

Indeed, how can a team maintain the interest of users to its project and not be interested in their opinion?

[Enchantment99]

Wouldn't say significantly. It's a good thing to have an overhaul from time to time, but it's not like a huge change in the fundamentals.

It's clear that the team will not get many practical advice. But still listening to someone else's opinion is useful. You can hear something important.

The opinion surrounding was always important for business. And constructive criticism always helps to develop projects well

It should be borne in mind that business creates opinions. Also, they need criticism at the initial stage of development, from objective people, that is, professionals in the right case. They hardly need the opinion of random people.

For this reason, teams are trying to conduct their first project presentations at crypto-exchange conferences.

[ClickAuto]

What if I told you that with Optherium's Dynamic Biometrics™ you could buy goods and services without cash, card, or a phone?

What if I told you that with Optherium's Dynamic Biometrics™ you do not need a passport or driver's license to confirm your identity?

With Optherium's Dynamic Biometrics™, you need only to scan your face, fingerprint, or utilize voice recognition for all transactions and identification purposes

The innovative product of the company will allow the calculation for services and goods to be brought to a new consumer level. And that's fine.

[Todaytech]

-----

With Optherium you will go to a store and the cashier will simply scan your face. With your voice confirmation the transaction is executed. Done!

With Optherium you will go to the airport and security will simply scan your face. With your voice confirmation your identity is verified and you are on your way!

-----
Learn more at https://optherium.io/

Yes, but that the cashier was able to scan the face of the buyer, it is necessary that he had innovative equipment.

[Leading person]

If you affirm ideologically, then you are right. I think that in the real world the creators of any product work on the basis of profitability. To make a profit, they need to maintain interest in their product. Only for this the opinion of the majority is examined.

Indeed, how can a team maintain the interest of users to its project and not be interested in their opinion?

Sometimes the team listens to the users' opinion in order to focus on the development of their product and get a successful result.

[Gromstop]

-----

With Optherium you will go to a store and the cashier will simply scan your face. With your voice confirmation the transaction is executed. Done!

With Optherium you will go to the airport and security will simply scan your face. With your voice confirmation your identity is verified and you are on your way!

-----
Learn more at https://optherium.io/

Yes, but that the cashier was able to scan the face of the buyer, it is necessary that he had innovative equipment.

This is an interesting prospect that has a wide range of possibilities - from trips to shopping.

[veranika55]

How IoT and AI are driving the manufacturing industry forward

Ari Zoldan, chairman of Quantum Media & CMO of Optherium Labs, shared his insights on how IoT and AI are driving the manufacturing industry forward in IBM’s industry publication INDUSTRIOUS. Here is an excerpt from the larger article, linked below:

Manufacturing is entering a new stage of development widely known as Industry 4.0. A synthesis of manufacturing processes and emerging technologies, Industry 4.0 promises greater efficiency and higher productive capacity, all for less operational expenses.

[veranika55]

Industry 4.0 is still in its early stages, but now is the time for manufacturing businesses to get on board. According to Advanced Manufacturing, 27 percent of companies in the industry have already “experienced substantial transformation,” while 36 percent of organizations were in the process of implementing new technologies.

“Technology is fundamentally remaking every industry, worldwide,” said Serge Beck, CEO of global fintech company Optherium Labs. “These disruptions are helping to push the world forward.”

[veranika55]

IoT and AI are critical parts of Industry 4.0, but they aren’t the only technologies changing the way the industry operates. Mixed reality, for instance, is allowing workers to view digital overlays based on the data captured and contextualized by IoT and AI systems.

Blockchain can employ a system of smart contracts to track and record supply chains that are crucial to the manufacturer’s end-product. While early adopters will reap the competitive advantages of Industry 4.0, make no mistake: adoption is not optional.
 Failure to recognize the inevitability of this transition is a death sentence for any manufacturer.

[veranika55]

“Enterprises have a choice to make in this period of disruption and transition: embrace it or resist it,” Beck said. “Those who embrace technological development and implement new technologies in smart ways will be the winners of tomorrow. Those who resist the inevitable march of technology are bound to fall behind.”

Link to original post: Page 28. https://ibm.co/2l1fzs9

Get in touch with us!
Feel free to leave us an email: media@optherium.io
Join us in telegram: https://t.me/optherium_club

[strongtree2505]

Wouldn't say significantly. It's a good thing to have an overhaul from time to time, but it's not like a huge change in the fundamentals.
It's clear that the team will not get many practical advice. But still listening to someone else's opinion is useful. You can hear something important.
The opinion surrounding was always important for business. And constructive criticism always helps to develop projects well

It should be borne in mind that business creates opinions. Also, they need criticism at the initial stage of development, from objective people, that is, professionals in the right case. They hardly need the opinion of random people.

I do not agree with you. In the end, the project is done for the users and if the majority points to some inexpensive, then any normal project will go to the meeting for its users

Developers need to know what users think about the project and it's also useful for investors to know the opinions of others.

I believe that it is very useful for developers to know the opinion of a product from other users in order to be able to correct shortcomings in time, if any.

It is natural! If the developers are not interested in the opinions of their users, it is unlikely there will be success