Bitcoin Forum
November 05, 2024, 05:26:59 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they believe that the creator of this topic displays some red flags which make them high-risk. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Nxt source code  (Read 5770 times)
Come-from-Beyond (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010

Newbie


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 08:01:53 PM
 #1

I wrote this a couple of times but noone seems to paid attention.

BCNext offered to reveal any part of the code for review. He doesn't want to publish the complete code till the 3rd of January to protect Nxt against copycats.

So, if there are Java programmers who would like to view (and possibly improve) the source code, please, post ur requests here.
bybitcoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 29, 2013, 08:09:52 PM
 #2

I wrote this a couple of times but noone seems to paid attention.

BCNext offered to reveal any part of the code for review. He doesn't want to publish the complete code till the 3rd of January to protect Nxt against copycats.

So, if there are Java programmers who would like to view (and possibly improve) the source code, please, post ur requests here.
Good clever move!
Perhaps you can post it on the announcement board too, for getting wider attention.
arafel71
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 51
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 08:17:26 PM
 #3

Hi come-from-beyond

That's interesting,
can you ''package'' and share an Eclipse workspace with somes java source ? we don't need all source from now because we need to protect nxt coin but some java source  can help us for understanding algorithm.

A Java J2EE project director.
Come-from-Beyond (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010

Newbie


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 08:20:07 PM
 #4

Hi come-from-beyond

That's interesting,
can you ''package'' and share an Eclipse workspace with somes java source ? we don't need all source from now because we need to protect nxt coin but some java source  can help us for understanding algorithm.

A Java J2EE project director.

I can't do it. Post here what part (mining algo, crypto, peer connection, etc.) u need and I'll post it here after I get it from BCNext.
arafel71
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 51
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 08:27:42 PM
 #5

I see many question on forum about mining process, maybe you can post some part of this code if BCnext allow it.

 I let other java developper ask other part (crypto, etc...) ,

many thanks for help us see ''threw  the fog'' .
Jean-Luc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
November 29, 2013, 10:34:59 PM
 #6

Post here what part (mining algo, crypto, peer connection, etc.) u need and I'll post it here after I get it from BCNext.

The part that seems to need most work at the moment is the networking and the loading of the block chain, which is still not stable, isn't it? It is also probably not Nxt specific, so disclosing it is not likely to help someone clone Nxt. I could try to help debugging it.

lead Nxt developer, gpg key id: 0x811D6940E1E4240C
Nxt blockchain platform | Ardor blockchain platform | Ignis ICO
kwest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 10:54:35 PM
 #7

I really like this move. A little community help never hurt.
bob131313
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 03:16:25 AM
 #8

I would like to review the peer connection code.
Thanks
Come-from-Beyond (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010

Newbie


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 07:33:29 AM
 #9

I see many question on forum about mining process, maybe you can post some part of this code if BCnext allow it.


Part of main() method:

Code:
			(new Thread() {

@Override
public void run() {

HashMap<Account, Block> lastBlocks = new HashMap<>();
HashMap<Account, BigInteger> hits = new HashMap<>();
while (state == 0) {

try {

if (bootstrappingState >= 0) {

HashMap<Account, User> unlockedAccounts = new HashMap<>();
for (User user : users.values()) {

if (user.secretPhrase != null) {

Account account = accounts.get(Account.getId(Crypto.getPublicKey(user.secretPhrase)));
if (account != null && account.getEffectiveBalance() > 0) {

unlockedAccounts.put(account, user);

}

}

}

for (Map.Entry<Account, User> unlockedAccountEntry : unlockedAccounts.entrySet()) {

Account account = unlockedAccountEntry.getKey();
User user = unlockedAccountEntry.getValue();
Block lastBlock = Block.getLastBlock();
if (lastBlocks.get(account) != lastBlock) {

byte[] generationSignature = Crypto.sign(lastBlock.generationSignature, user.secretPhrase);
byte[] generationSignatureHash = MessageDigest.getInstance("SHA-256").digest(generationSignature);
BigInteger hit = new BigInteger(1, new byte[] {generationSignatureHash[7], generationSignatureHash[6], generationSignatureHash[5], generationSignatureHash[4], generationSignatureHash[3], generationSignatureHash[2], generationSignatureHash[1], generationSignatureHash[0]});

lastBlocks.put(account, lastBlock);
hits.put(account, hit);

JSONObject response = new JSONObject();
response.put("response", "setBlockGenerationDeadline");
response.put("deadline", hit.divide(BigInteger.valueOf(Block.getBaseTarget()).multiply(BigInteger.valueOf(account.getEffectiveBalance()))).longValue() - (getEpochTime(System.currentTimeMillis()) - lastBlock.timestamp));

user.send(response);

}

int elapsedTime = getEpochTime(System.currentTimeMillis()) - lastBlock.timestamp;
if (elapsedTime > 0) {

BigInteger target = BigInteger.valueOf(Block.getBaseTarget()).multiply(BigInteger.valueOf(account.getEffectiveBalance())).multiply(BigInteger.valueOf(elapsedTime));
if (hits.get(account).compareTo(target) < 0) {

account.generateBlock(user.secretPhrase);

}

}

}

}

Thread.sleep(1000);

} catch (Exception e) {

log("9: " + e.toString());

}

}

}

}).start();


Part of Account class:

Code:
		int getEffectiveBalance() {

if (height == 0) {

return (int)(balance / 100);

}

if (Block.getLastBlock().height - height < 1440) {

return 0;

}

int amount = 0;
for (long transactionId : Block.getLastBlock().transactions) {

Transaction transaction = transactions.get(transactionId);
if (transaction.recipient == id) {

amount += transaction.amount;

}

}

return (int)(balance / 100) - amount;

}


Part of Account class:

Code:
		void generateBlock(String secretPhrase) throws Exception {

HashMap<Long, Transaction> newTransactions;
synchronized (transactions) {

Transaction[] sortedTransactions = unconfirmedTransactions.values().toArray(new Transaction[0]);
while (sortedTransactions.length > 0) {

int i;
for (i = 0; i < sortedTransactions.length; i++) {

Transaction transaction = sortedTransactions[i];
if (transaction.referencedTransaction != 0 && transactions.get(transaction.referencedTransaction) == null) {

sortedTransactions[i] = sortedTransactions[sortedTransactions.length - 1];
Transaction[] tmp = new Transaction[sortedTransactions.length - 1];
System.arraycopy(sortedTransactions, 0, tmp, 0, tmp.length);
sortedTransactions = tmp;

break;

}

}
if (i == sortedTransactions.length) {

break;

}

}
Arrays.sort(sortedTransactions);

newTransactions = new HashMap<>();
for (int i = 0; i < 255 && i < sortedTransactions.length; i++) {

long id = sortedTransactions[i].getId();
newTransactions.put(id, sortedTransactions[i]);

}

}

Block block = new Block(1, getEpochTime(System.currentTimeMillis()), lastBlock, newTransactions.size(), 0, 0, 0, null, Crypto.getPublicKey(secretPhrase), null, new byte[64]);
block.transactions = new long[block.numberOfTransactions];
int i = 0;
for (Map.Entry<Long, Transaction> transactionEntry : newTransactions.entrySet()) {

Transaction transaction = transactionEntry.getValue();
if (transaction.type == Transaction.TYPE_PAYMENT && transaction.subtype == Transaction.SUBTYPE_PAYMENT_ORDINARY_PAYMENT) {

block.totalAmount += transaction.amount;

}
block.totalFee += transaction.fee;
block.payloadLength += transaction.getBytes().length;
block.transactions[i++] = transactionEntry.getKey();

}

Arrays.sort(block.transactions);
MessageDigest digest = MessageDigest.getInstance("SHA-256");
for (i = 0; i < block.numberOfTransactions; i++) {

digest.update(newTransactions.get(block.transactions[i]).getBytes());

}
block.payloadHash = digest.digest();

block.generationSignature = Crypto.sign(Block.getLastBlock().generationSignature, secretPhrase);

byte[] data = block.getBytes();
byte[] data2 = new byte[data.length - 64];
System.arraycopy(data, 0, data2, 0, data2.length);
block.blockSignature = Crypto.sign(data2, secretPhrase);

ByteBuffer outputBuffer = Peer.getOutputBuffer(224 + block.payloadLength, Peer.PACKET_TYPE_NEW_BLOCK_REQUEST);

outputBuffer.put(block.getBytes());
for (i = 0; i < block.numberOfTransactions; i++) {

Transaction transaction = newTransactions.get(block.transactions[i]);
outputBuffer.put(transaction.getBytes());

}

Peer.sendToAllPeers(outputBuffer);

}


Part of Transaction class (used by Arrays.sort()):

Code:
		public int compareTo(Transaction o) {

if (height < o.height) {

return -1;

} else if (height > o.height) {

return 1;

} else {

if (fee * 32768L / getBytes().length > o.fee * 32768L / o.getBytes().length) {

return -1;

} else if (fee * 32768L / getBytes().length < o.fee * 32768L / o.getBytes().length) {

return 1;

} else {

if (timestamp < o.timestamp) {

return -1;

} else if (timestamp > o.timestamp) {

return 1;

} else {

if (index < o.index) {

return -1;

} else if (index > o.index) {

return 1;

} else {

return 0;

}

}

}

}

}
Come-from-Beyond (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010

Newbie


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 07:41:59 AM
 #10

The part that seems to need most work at the moment is the networking and the loading of the block chain, which is still not stable, isn't it? It is also probably not Nxt specific, so disclosing it is not likely to help someone clone Nxt. I could try to help debugging it.

Networking is being fixed now, it will be published later.


Loading the blockchain


Part of main() method:

Code:
					if (bootstrappingState >= 0) {

peer = Peer.getAnyConnectedPeer();
if (peer != null) {

setBootstrappingState(0);

ByteBuffer outputBuffer = Peer.getOutputBuffer(0, Peer.PACKET_TYPE_CUMULATIVE_DIFFICULTY_REQUEST);

peer.send(outputBuffer);

}

}


Part of Peer class:

Code:
			case PACKET_TYPE_CUMULATIVE_DIFFICULTY_REQUEST:
{

byte[] cumulativeDifficulty = Block.getLastBlock().cumulativeDifficulty.toByteArray();

ByteBuffer outputBuffer = getOutputBuffer(2 + cumulativeDifficulty.length, PACKET_TYPE_CUMULATIVE_DIFFICULTY_RESPONSE);

outputBuffer.putShort((short)cumulativeDifficulty.length);
outputBuffer.put(cumulativeDifficulty);

send(outputBuffer);

}
break;

case PACKET_TYPE_CUMULATIVE_DIFFICULTY_RESPONSE:
{

if (bootstrappingState == 0) {

int cumulativeDifficultyLength = inputBuffer.getShort();
byte[] cumulativeDifficulty = new byte[cumulativeDifficultyLength];
inputBuffer.get(cumulativeDifficulty);

betterCumulativeDifficulty = new BigInteger(cumulativeDifficulty);
synchronized (blocks) {

if (betterCumulativeDifficulty.compareTo(Block.getLastBlock().cumulativeDifficulty) > 0) {

setBootstrappingState(-1);
bootstrappingPeer = this;

ByteBuffer outputBuffer = Peer.getOutputBuffer(0, PACKET_TYPE_MILESTONE_BLOCKS_REQUEST);

send(outputBuffer);

} else {

setBootstrappingState(1);

}

}

}

}
break;

case PACKET_TYPE_MILESTONE_BLOCKS_REQUEST:
{

try {

LinkedList<Long> milestoneBlocks = new LinkedList<>();

Block block = Block.getLastBlock();
int jumpLength = block.height / 4093 + 1;
while (block.height > 0) {

milestoneBlocks.add(block.getId());
for (int i = 0; i < jumpLength && block.height > 0; i++) {

block = blocks.get(block.previousBlock);

}

}

ByteBuffer outputBuffer = Peer.getOutputBuffer(2 + milestoneBlocks.size() * 8, PACKET_TYPE_MILESTONE_BLOCKS_RESPONSE);

outputBuffer.putShort((short)milestoneBlocks.size());
for (int i = 0; i < milestoneBlocks.size(); i++) {

outputBuffer.putLong(milestoneBlocks.get(i));

}

send(outputBuffer);

} catch (Exception e) {

log("12: " + e.toString());

}

}
break;

case PACKET_TYPE_MILESTONE_BLOCKS_RESPONSE:
{

if (bootstrappingState < 0) {

Block commonBlock = blocks.get(genesisBlock);

int numberOfBlocks = inputBuffer.getShort();
while (numberOfBlocks-- > 0) {

long blockId = inputBuffer.getLong();
Block block = blocks.get(blockId);
if (block != null) {

commonBlock = block;

break;

}

}

try {

ByteBuffer outputBuffer = Peer.getOutputBuffer(8, PACKET_TYPE_NEXT_BLOCK_IDS_REQUEST);

lastCommonBlock = commonBlock.getId();
outputBuffer.putLong(lastCommonBlock);

send(outputBuffer);

} catch (Exception e) {

log("13: " + e.toString());

}

}

}
break;

case PACKET_TYPE_NEXT_BLOCK_IDS_REQUEST:
{

try {

LinkedList<Long> nextBlocks = new LinkedList<>();

Block block = blocks.get(inputBuffer.getLong());

while (block != null && nextBlocks.size() < 4093) {

block = blocks.get(block.nextBlock);
if (block != null) {

nextBlocks.add(block.getId());

}

}

ByteBuffer outputBuffer = Peer.getOutputBuffer(2 + nextBlocks.size() * 8, PACKET_TYPE_NEXT_BLOCK_IDS_RESPONSE);

outputBuffer.putShort((short)nextBlocks.size());
for (int i = 0; i < nextBlocks.size(); i++) {

outputBuffer.putLong(nextBlocks.get(i));

}

send(outputBuffer);

} catch (Exception e) {

log("14: " + e.toString());

}

}
break;

case PACKET_TYPE_NEXT_BLOCK_IDS_RESPONSE:
{

if (bootstrappingState < 0) {

int numberOfBlocks = inputBuffer.getShort();
if (numberOfBlocks == 0) {

setBootstrappingState(1);

break;

}

long blockId;
while (numberOfBlocks-- > 0) {

blockId = inputBuffer.getLong();
if (blocks.get(blockId) == null) {

break;

}

lastCommonBlock = blockId;

}

if (numberOfBlocks < 0) {

ByteBuffer outputBuffer = Peer.getOutputBuffer(8, PACKET_TYPE_NEXT_BLOCK_IDS_REQUEST);

outputBuffer.putLong(lastCommonBlock);

send(outputBuffer);

} else {

if (Block.getLastBlock().height - blocks.get(lastCommonBlock).height > 720) {

setBootstrappingState(1);

} else {

while (lastBlock != lastCommonBlock && Block.popLastBlock()) { }

if (lastBlock == lastCommonBlock) {

ByteBuffer outputBuffer = Peer.getOutputBuffer(8, PACKET_TYPE_NEXT_BLOCKS_REQUEST);

outputBuffer.putLong(lastBlock);

send(outputBuffer);

} else {

setBootstrappingState(1);

}

}

}

}

}
break;

case PACKET_TYPE_NEXT_BLOCKS_REQUEST:
{

LinkedList<Block> nextBlocks = new LinkedList<>();
int totalLength = 0;

Block block = blocks.get(inputBuffer.getLong());

while (block != null) {

block = blocks.get(block.nextBlock);
if (block != null) {

int length = 224 + block.payloadLength;
if (totalLength + length > 32768 - (8 + 2)) {

break;

}

nextBlocks.add(block);
totalLength += length;

}

}

ByteBuffer outputBuffer = Peer.getOutputBuffer(2 + totalLength, PACKET_TYPE_NEXT_BLOCKS_RESPONSE);

outputBuffer.putShort((short)nextBlocks.size());
for (int i = 0; i < nextBlocks.size(); i++) {

block = nextBlocks.get(i);
outputBuffer.put(block.getBytes());
for (int j = 0; j < block.numberOfTransactions; j++) {

outputBuffer.put(transactions.get(block.transactions[j]).getBytes());

}

}

send(outputBuffer);

}
break;

case PACKET_TYPE_NEXT_BLOCKS_RESPONSE:
{

if (bootstrappingState < 0) {

int numberOfBlocks = inputBuffer.getShort();
if (numberOfBlocks == 0) {

setBootstrappingState(1);

break;

}

while (numberOfBlocks-- > 0) {

if (!Block.pushBlock(inputBuffer)) {

break;

}

}

ByteBuffer outputBuffer = Peer.getOutputBuffer(8, PACKET_TYPE_NEXT_BLOCKS_REQUEST);

outputBuffer.putLong(lastBlock);

send(outputBuffer);

}

}
break;
Come-from-Beyond (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010

Newbie


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 07:44:51 AM
 #11

I would like to review the peer connection code.
Thanks

Yesterday I found a problem related to peer connection implementation - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345619.msg3771678#msg3771678

BCNext is working on fixing the issue. Updated code will be published later.
arafel71
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 51
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 07:49:16 AM
 #12

I see many question on forum about mining process, maybe you can post some part of this code if BCnext allow it.


thanks
inkadnb
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 01, 2013, 10:15:09 AM
 #13

Where is the block and transaction verification done?

This is the part I'm most interested in.

For example, I could, in theory have a few NXT coins, and simply by changing my clock ahead a several days, could I not in theory generate a new block?

As per,
Code:
int elapsedTime = getEpochTime(System.currentTimeMillis()) - lastBlock.timestamp;
if (elapsedTime > 0) {
    
    BigInteger target = BigInteger.valueOf(Block.getBaseTarget()).multiply(BigInteger.valueOf(account.getEffectiveBalance())).multiply(BigInteger.valueOf(elapsedTime));
    if (hits.get(account).compareTo(target) < 0) {
        
        account.generateBlock(user.secretPhrase);
        
    }
    
}

you need at least one coin, but the entire value of the base target and balance is multiplied by the difference between the current time (in milliseconds) and the lastBlock. How is this enforced on other clients? How do they know that the time I'm generating is in fact valid?

I realize there's time synchronization/rejection going on, but I'd like some clarification. Is the time verification done separately from transaction and block verification?

Come-from-Beyond (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010

Newbie


View Profile
December 01, 2013, 10:28:32 AM
 #14

Where is the block and transaction verification done?

Asked for that code.


For example, I could, in theory have a few NXT coins, and simply by changing my clock ahead a several days, could I not in theory generate a new block?

All blocks with timestamps in the future r ignored.
inkadnb
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 01, 2013, 10:53:04 AM
 #15

Where is the block and transaction verification done?

Asked for that code.


For example, I could, in theory have a few NXT coins, and simply by changing my clock ahead a several days, could I not in theory generate a new block?

All blocks with timestamps in the future r ignored.

Right, I was implying that you set the time ahead enough so that generateBlock() is called, however, once in this method, revert the time back so when
Code:
			
Block block = new Block(1, getEpochTime(System.currentTimeMillis()), lastBlock, newTransactions.size(), 0, 0, 0, null, Crypto.getPublicKey(secretPhrase), null, new byte[64]);
is called, the system time is correct. This falsely creates a "valid" block.

This would be trivial to do in any modern debugger.

Come-from-Beyond (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010

Newbie


View Profile
December 01, 2013, 10:58:17 AM
 #16

Right, I was implying that you set the time ahead enough so that generateBlock() is called, however, once in this method, revert the time back so when
Code:
			
Block block = new Block(1, getEpochTime(System.currentTimeMillis()), lastBlock, newTransactions.size(), 0, 0, 0, null, Crypto.getPublicKey(secretPhrase), null, new byte[64]);
is called, the system time is correct. This falsely creates a "valid" block.

This would be trivial to do in any modern debugger.

Such a block won't pass validation.
SlyWax
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 248
Merit: 251



View Profile
December 02, 2013, 01:46:10 AM
 #17

There is not a single comment in the code,
this is very bad for the future ...
extortion
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 141
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 02, 2013, 04:11:26 AM
 #18

non existent cryptocurrencies, because hey, why not?

Extortion. We are Anonymous. We are legion. We do not forgive. We Do Not Forget. Expect Us.
Come-from-Beyond (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010

Newbie


View Profile
December 02, 2013, 07:54:02 AM
 #19

There is not a single comment in the code,
this is very bad for the future ...

Hardcore programmers don't bother with commenting.  Grin
klee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 02, 2013, 08:44:41 AM
 #20

There is not a single comment in the code,
this is very bad for the future ...

Hardcore programmers don't bother with commenting.  Grin
LOL  Grin
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!